Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Moving Towards Integrated Policy Formulation and Evaluation: The Green Economy Model Cover

Moving Towards Integrated Policy Formulation and Evaluation: The Green Economy Model

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 16 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015)
By: Andrea M. Bassi  
Open Access
|Feb 2016

References

  1. [1] UNEP. Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Fulmer J. What in the world is infrastructure? Infrastructure Investor 2009:(July/August):30–32.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Goodenough R., Page S. Evaluating the environmental impact of a major transport infrastructure project: the Channel Tunnel high-speed rail link. Applied Geography 1994:14(1):26–50. doi:10.1016/0143-6228(94)90004-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Makki T., Fakheran S., Moradi H., Iravani M., Senn J. Landscape-scale impacts of transportation infrastructure on spatial dynamics of two vulnerable ungulate species in Ghamishloo Wildlife Refuge, Iran. Ecological Indicators 2013:31:6–14. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Jones H., Moura F., Domingos T. Transport Infrastructure Project Evaluation Using Cost-Benefit Analysis. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014:111:400–409. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.073
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] Arce R., Gullòn N. The application of Strategic Environmental Assessment to sustainability assessment of infrastructure development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2000:20(3):393–402. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00050-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] WWF. Living Planet Report, 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: General Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, 2005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Helm D. Taking natural capital seriously. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2004:30(1):109–125. doi:10.1093/oxrep/gru005
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Noldan B., Janoušková S., Hák T. How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators 2012:17:4–13. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.033
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Ulgiati S., Zucaro A., & Franzese P. Shared wealth or nobody’s land? The worth of natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 2011:70(4):778–787. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.015
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Waddell P., Liming W., Xuan L. URBANSIM. In: Planning Support Systems for Cities and Regions. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Learmonth G., Smith D., Sherman W., White M., Plank J. A Practical Approach to the Complex Problem of Environmental Sustainability. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal 2011:16(1).
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Fishbone L. G., Giesen G., Goldstein G., Hymmen H. A., Stocks K. J., Vos H., Wilde D., Zöcher R., Balzer C., Abilock H. User’s Guide for MARKAL. IEA Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme, 1983.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Loulou R., Goldstein G., Noble K. Documentation for the MARKAL Family of Models. IEA Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme, 2004.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Tallis H., Ricketts T., et al. InVEST 2.2.2 User’s Guide: Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs. Stanford, The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Lofgren H., Diaz-Bonilla C. MAMS: An Economy-wide Model for Development Strategy Analysis. The World Bank. Washington DC, USA, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Sterman J. D. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 2000.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Bassi A. M. Using Simulation Models for Green Economy Policy Making: A Comparative Assessment. Review of Business and Economics Studies 2014:2(1):88–99.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Bassi A., Bečić E., Lombardi N. An Introduction to the Assessment of Sustainable Paths, Models and Metrics. Asian Social Science 2014:10(11):17–27. doi:10.5539/ass.v10n11p17
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Wallhagen M., Glaumann M. Design consequences of differences in building assessment tools: a case study. Building Research & Information 2011:39(1):16–33. doi:10.1080/09613218.2010.513210
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Randers J. Elements of the System Dynamics Method. Portland, OR: Productivity Press, 1980.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Richardson G., Pugh A. Introduction to System Dynamics with Dynamo. Portland, OR, USA: Productivity Press, 1981.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Forrester J. W., et al. Road Maps: A Guide to Learning System Dynamics, System Dynamics Group. Sloan School of Management, MIT, 2002.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] Roberts N., Andersen D., Deal R., Garet M., Shaffer W. Introduction to Computer Simulation. The System Dynamics Approach. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 1983.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] Probst G., Bassi A. M. Tackling Complexity, A Systemic Approach for Decision Makers. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK, 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] Ibarran M. E., Bassi A. M., Boyd R. Integrating SD and CGE models to assess green economy policies: Methods and Application to Mexico. In: Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Environmental Studies. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. [28] Van Paddenburg A., Bassi A., Butler E., Cosslett C., Dean A. Heart of Borneo: Investing in Nature for a Green Economy. WWF Heart of Borneo Global Initiative, Jakarta, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. [29] Bassi A., Lombardi N., Gallagher L. A. Green Economy Modelling of Ecosystem Services in the Dawna-Tenasserim Landscape (DTL) along the “Road to Dawei”. WWF Greater Mekong, 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. [30] Jones M. Accounting for the environment: Towards a theoretical perspective for environmental accounting and reporting. Accounting Forum 2010:34(2):123–138. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2010.03.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. [31] De Groot R., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 2010:7(3):260–272. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. [32] Boschken H. Scale, the Silo Effect and Intergovernmental Cooperation: Institutional Analysis of Global Cities and Ecological Sustainability. American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting. San Jose State University, 2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rtuect-2015-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 19
Published on: Feb 12, 2016
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Green Economy,
System Dynamics,
simulation,
model,
policy,
natural capital
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2016 Andrea M. Bassi, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 16 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015)Next article