Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sperm sexing technology - new directions in medicine Cover

Sperm sexing technology - new directions in medicine

Revista Romana de Medicina de Laborator
Volume 24 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
By: Laura Pindaru,  Iulia Maria Balaci and  Ioan Ştefan Groza  
Open Access
|Mar 2016

References

  1. 1. Garner DL, Seidel Jr GE. History of commercializing sexed semen for cattle. Theriogenology. 2008 Apr 15;69(7):886-95. Epub 2008 Mar 17. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.01.00610.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.01.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Vintilă I. Transferul de embrioni şi biotehnologii asociate. Ed. Orizonturi Universitare Timişoara. 2005;11.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Faber DC, Molina JA, Ohlrichs JA, Vander Zwaag DF, Ferré LB, Commercialization of animal biotechnology. Theriogenology. 02/2003, 59(1):125-38.10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01264-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Parrilla I, Vázquez JM, Oliver-Bonet M, Navarro J, Yelamos J, Roca J, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization in diluted and flow cytometrically sorted boar spermatozoa using specific DNA direct probes labelled by nick translation. Reproduction. 2003 Sep;126(3):317-25. DOI: 10.1530/rep.0.126031710.1530/rep.0.1260317
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Taton R, Armaldez Rbeaujeu., J, Beaujouan G, Bloch R, Bourgey L, et al. Ştiinţa antică şi medievală – de la origini la 1450. Vol.I, Ed. Şţiinţifică Bucureşti. 1970; 212-214; 205-14.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Windsor DP, Evans G, White IG. Sex predetermination by separation of X and Y chromosome-bearing sperm: A review. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1993;5(2):155-71. DOI: 10.1071/RD993015510.1071/RD9930155
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Seidel GE Jr. Sexing Mammalian Sperm – Where Do We Go from Here? J Reprod Dev. 2012;58(5):505-9. DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2012-07710.1262/jrd.2012-077
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Cuevas I, Llácer J, Ten J, Mendiola J, Bernabeu R. Current situation of sex selection. Situación actual de la selección de sexo. 2002;19(5):337.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Spinaci M, Perteghella, S Chlapanidas T, Galeati G, Daniele Vigo, Tamanini C et al. Storage of Sexed Boar Spermatozoa: Limits and Perspectives, Theriogenology. 2015 May 29. pii: S0093-691X(15)00282-4.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Xu ZZ. Application of liquid semen technology improves conception rate of sex-sorted semen in lactating dairy cows, Journal of Dairy Science. 2014 Nov 97;11: 7298–304. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-850710.3168/jds.2014-8507
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Johnson LA. Sex preselection in swine: Altered sex ratios in offspring following surgical insemination of flow sorted X- and Y-bearing sperm. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 1991;26:309-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.1991.tb01546.x10.1111/j.1439-0531.1991.tb01546.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Catt SL, O’brien JK, Maxwell WMC, Evans G. Assessment of ram and boar spermatozoa during cell-sorting by flow cytometry. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 1997 Oct 32:251-8.10.1111/j.1439-0531.1997.tb01290.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Basil A, Gabriela Mastromonaco, King AK. Recent Advances in Reproductive Biotechnologies in Sheep and Goat. Journal of Veterinary Science & Technology. 2010 Sept; 1:101.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. O’brien JK, Steinman KJ, Robeck TR. Application of sperm sorting and associated reproductive technology for wildlife management and conservation. Theriogenology. 2009 Jan 1;71(1):98-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.05210.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.052
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Seidel GE JR. - Sexing mammalian sperm: intertwining of commerce, technology, and biology. Anim Reprod Sci. 2003, 79 (3-4), p: 145-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00162-310.1016/S0378-4320(03)00162-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Albert De Vries. The Economics of Sexed Semen in Dairy Heifers and Cows. AN214, of the Animal Science Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. 2009.10.32473/edis-an214-2009
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Sharpe JC, Evans KM. Advances in flow cytometry for sperm sexing. Theriogenology. 2009 Jan 1;71(1):4-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.02110.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.021
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Gordon IR. Reproductive Technologies in Farm Animals. Ed. CABI Publishing, 2004, 75-79. DOI: 10.1079/9780851998626.000010.1079/9780851998626.0000
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Espinosa-Cervantes R., Córdova-Izquierdo A. Sexing sperm of domestic animals. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2013 Jan;45(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-012-0215-010.1007/s11250-012-0215-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Jafar SI, Flint APF. Sex selection in mammals: A review. Theriogenology. 1996;46:191-200. DOI: 10.1016/0093-691X(96)00177-X10.1016/0093-691X(96)00177-X
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Johnson LA, Rath D, Vázquez JM, Maxwell WMC, Dobrinsk JR. Preselection of sex of offspring in swine for production: current status of the process and its application. Theriogenology. 2005 Jan 15;63(2):615-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.03510.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.035
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Cenariu M, Groza I, Pall E, Bogdan L, Morar I, Ciupe S. et al. Sexing of Bovine Embryos Using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH). Romanian Biotechnological Letters. 2011;162:6056-61.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Lopes RFF, Forell F, Oliveira ATD, Rodrigues JL. Splitting and biopsy for bovine embryo sexing under field conditions. Theriogenology. 2001 Dec 1;56(9):1383-92. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00641-010.1016/S0093-691X(01)00641-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Cenariu M, Pall E, Groza IŞ. Ultrasonographic determination of fetal sex in cattle. Bulletin UASMV, Veterinary Medicine. 2012;69:1-2.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Larrabee PB, Johnson KL, Pestova E, Lucas M, Wilber K, Leshane ES, et al. Microarray analysis of cellfree fetal DNA in amniotic fluid: a prenatal molecular karyotype. Am J Hum Genet. 2004 Sep; 75(3): 485–91. DOI: 10.1086/42328810.1086/423288118202615252756
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Van Dilla MA, Gledhill BL, Lake S, Dean PN, Gray JW, Kachel V, et al. Measurement of mammalian sperm deoxyribonucleic acid by flow cytometry-problems and approaches. J Histochem Cytochem. 1977 Jul;25(7):763-73. DOI: 10.1177/25.7.7045510.1177/25.7.7045570455
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Garner DL, Gledhill BL, Pinkel D, Lake S, Stephenson D, Van Dilla M, et al. Quantification of the X- and Y-chromosome-bearing spermatozoa of domesticanimals by flow cytometry. Biol Reprod. 1983 Mar;28(2):312-21. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod28.2.31210.1095/biolreprod28.2.3126682341
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Moruzzi JF. Selecting a mammalian species for the separation of X- and Ychromosome-bearing spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 1979 Nov;57(2):319-23. DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.057031910.1530/jrf.0.0570319
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Seidel GE Jr., Johnson LA. Sexing mammalian sperm - overview. Theriogenology. December 1999Volume 52, Issue 8, Pages 1267–72. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00215-010.1016/S0093-691X(99)00215-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Welch GR, Johnson LA. Sex preselection: Laboratory validadtion of the sperm sex ratio of flow sorted X- and Y-sperm by sort reanalysis for DNA. Theriogenology. 1999;52:1343-52 DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00221-610.1016/S0093-691X(99)00221-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Johnson LA, Flook JP, Look MV. Flow cytometry of X- and Y – chromosome-bearing sperm for DNA using an improved preparation method and staining with Hoechst 33342. Gamete Res. 1987; 17, p: 203-12. DOI: 10.1002/mrd.112017030310.1002/mrd.1120170303
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Schenk JL, Suh TK, Cran D, Gseidel GE Jr. Cryopreservation of flow-sorted bovine spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 1999 Dec;52(8):1375-91. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00224-110.1016/S0093-691X(99)00224-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Shapiro HM. Practical flow cytometry. 4th edition. Eds. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. 2003. DOI: 10.1002/047172273110.1002/0471722731
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Johnson LA, Flook JP, Hawk HW. Sex preselection in rabbits: live births from X- and Y-sperm separated by DNA and cell sorting. Biol Reprod. 1989 Aug;41(2):199-203. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod41.2.19910.1095/biolreprod41.2.199
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Hollinshead FK, Evans G, Evans KM, Catt SL, Maxwell WMC, O’brien JK. Birth of lambs of a pre-determined sex after in vitro production of embryos using frozen-thawed sex-sorted and re-frozen-thawed ram spermatozoa. Reproduction 127, 2004; p: 557-68. DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.0004910.1530/rep.1.00049
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 36. Johnson LA, Welch GR. Sex pre-selection: high-speed flow cytometric sorting of X and Y sperm for maximum efficiency. Theriogenology. 1999 Dec;52(8):1323-41. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00220-410.1016/S0093-691X(99)00220-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Welch GR, Johnson LA. Sex preselection: Laboratory validadtion of the sperm sex ratio of flow sorted X- and Y-sperm by sort reanalysis for DNA. Theriogenology. 1999;52:1343-52. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00221-610.1016/S0093-691X(99)00221-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Welch GR, Waldbieser GC, Wall RJ, Johnson LA. Flow cytometric sperm sorting and PCR to confirm separation of X- and Y-bearing bovine sperm. Animal Biotechnology. 1995; 6: 131-9. DOI: 10.1080/1049539950952584210.1080/10495399509525842
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. 39. Kawarasaki T., Welch GR, Long CR, Yoshida M, Johnson LA. Verification of flow cytometorically-sorted X-and Y-bearing porcine spermatozoa and reanalysis of spermatozoa for DNA content using the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique. Theriogenology. 1998 Sep;50(4):625-35. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00167-810.1016/S0093-691X(98)00167-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. 40. Piumi F, Vaiman D, Cribiu Ep, Guerin B, Humblot P. Specific cytogenetic labeling of bovine spermatozoa bearing X or Y chromosome Using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Genetic Selection Evolution. 2001; 33: 89-98. DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-33-1-8910.1186/1297-9686-33-1-89
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. 41. Parrilla I, Vazquez JM, Centurion F, Roca J, Gil MA, Lucas X, et al. Effect of high-speed flow sorting on sperm motility pattern of boar sperm. Theriogenology. 2001;55:501(Abstr.).
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. 42. Seidel GE Jr., Garner DL. Current status of sexing mammalian spermatozoa. Reproduction. 2002 Dec;124(6):733-43. DOI: 10.1530/rep.0.124073310.1530/rep.0.1240733
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. 43. Pinkel D, Lake S, Gledhill BL, Van Dilla MA, Stephenson D, Watchmaker G. High resolution DNA content measurements of mammalian sperm. Theriogenology. 1999 Dec;52(8):1343-52.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. 44. Rens W, Welch GR, Johnson L. A novel nozzle for more efficient sperm orientation to improve sorting efficiency of X and Y chromosome bearing sperm. Cytometry. 1998 Dec 1;33(4):476-8. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19981201)33:4<;476::AID-CYTO12>3.0.CO;2-B10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19981201)33:4<;476::AID-CYTO12>3.0.CO;2-B
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. 45. Durand RE, Olive PL. Cytotoxicity, mutagenicity and DNA damage by Hoechst 33342. J Histochem Cytochem. 1982 Feb;30(2):111-6. DOI: 10.1177/30.2.706181610.1177/30.2.7061816
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. 46. Libbus BL, Perreault SD, Johnson LA, Pinkel D. Incidence of chromosome aberration in mammalian sperm stained with Hoechst 33342 and UV-laser irradiated during flow sorting. Mutat Res. 1987 Oct;182(5):265-74. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1161(87)90011-210.1016/0165-1161(87)90011-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. 47. Suh TK, Schenk JL. Pressure during flow sorting of bull sperm affects post-thaw motility characteristics. Theriogenology. 2003;59p: 516. (abstract).
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. 48. Maxwell WMC, Evans G, Hollinshead FK, Bathgate R, De Graaf SP, Eriksson BM et al. Integration of sperm sexing technology into the ART toolbox. Anim Reprod Sci. 2004 Jul;82-83:79-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.01310.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.013
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. 49. Garner DL. Hoechst 33342: the dye that enabled differentiation of living X-and Y-chromosome bearing mammalian sperm. Theriogenology. 2009 Jan 1;71(1):11-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.02310.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.023
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. 50. Libbus BL, Perreault SD, Johnson LA, Pinkel D. Incidence of chromosome aberration in mammalian sperm stained with Hoechst 33342 and UV-laser irradiated during flow sorting. Mutat Res. 1987 Oct;182(5):265-74. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1161(87)90011-210.1016/0165-1161(87)90011-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. 51. Amann RP, Seidel GE Jr. Prospects for sexing mammalian sperm. Boulder, CO: Colorado Associated University Pres. 1982.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. 52. Blecher SR, Howie R, Li S, Detmar J, Blahut L. A new approach to immunological sexing of sperm. Theriogenology. 1999 Dec;52(8):1309-21. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00219-810.1016/S0093-691X(99)00219-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. 53. Reed K. Cattle Breeding Technologies. Chapter 14 Semen and embryo sexing. 2006:67-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. 54. Ericsson RJ, Ericsson SA. Sex ratios. In Encyclopedia of Reproduction. Vol. 4 Eds E Knobil and JD Neill. Academic Press, London, 1999:431-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. 55. Van Munster E.B. Interferometry in flow to sort unstained X- and Y-chromosome bearing bull spermatozoa. Cytometry. 2002 Mar 1;47(3):192-9. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.1006410.1002/cyto.10064
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. 56. Ollero M, Perez-Pe R, Gargallo I, Morlanes S, Osada J, Mui-o-Blanco T, et al. Separation of ram spermatozoa bearing X and Y chromosome by centrifugal countercurrent distribution in an aqueous two-phase system. J Androl. 2000 Nov-Dec;21(6):921-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. 57. Garner DL, Evans KM, Seidel GE. Sex-Sorting Sperm Using Flow Cytometry/Cell Sorting. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;927:279-95. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-038-0_2610.1007/978-1-62703-038-0_26
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. 58. Strange H. Non-medical sex selection: ethical issues. British Medical Bulletin, 2010; 94:7–20. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldq00210.1093/bmb/ldq002
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. 59. Darnovsky M. Countries with laws or policies on sex selection. In: Memo for the April 13 New York City Sex Selection Meeting, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. 60. Dondorp W, DeWert G, Pennings G, Shenfield F, Devroey P, Tarlatzis B, Barri P, Diedrich K. SHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 20: Sex selection for non medical reasons. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(6):1448-54. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det10910.1093/humrep/det109
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. 61. Dawson K, Trounson A. Ethics of sex selection for family balancing. Why balance families? Hum Reprod. 1996 Dec;11(12):2577-8. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a01917110.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019171
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. 62. Doyal, L., McLean, S. Choosing children: intergenerational justice? Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Mar;10 Suppl 1:119-24. DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62219-510.1016/S1472-6483(10)62219-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. 63. Dai J. Preconception sex selection: the perspective of a person of the undesired gender. Am J Bioeth. 2001 Winter;1(1):37-8. DOI: 10.1162/15265160175007903210.1162/15265160175007903211808594
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. 64. Puri S, Nachtigall RD. The ethics of sex selection: A comparison of the attitudes and experiences of primary care physicians and physician providers of clinical sex-selection services. Fertil Steril. 2010 May 1;93(7):2107-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.05310.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.05319342036
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. 65. Kalfoglou AL, Kammersell M, Philpott S, Dahl E. Ethical arguments for and against sperm sorting for non-267 medical sex selection: a review. Reprod Biomed Online 2013;26:231-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.00710.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.00723337421
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. 66. Liao SM. The ethics of using genetic engineering for sex selection. Med Ethics 2005;31:116–118. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.00598310.1136/jme.2003.005983173407915681683
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rrlm-2016-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2284-5623 | Journal ISSN: 1841-6624
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 111 - 121
Submitted on: Oct 8, 2015
|
Accepted on: Feb 6, 2016
|
Published on: Mar 19, 2016
Published by: Romanian Association of Laboratory Medicine
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Molecular biology,
Biochemistry,
Human biology,
Microbiology and virology

© 2016 Laura Pindaru, Iulia Maria Balaci, Ioan Ştefan Groza, published by Romanian Association of Laboratory Medicine
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 24 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)Next article