Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Environmental life cycle assessment of railway bridge materials using UHPFRC Cover

Environmental life cycle assessment of railway bridge materials using UHPFRC

Open Access
|Feb 2017

References

  1. [1] Jonsson, D. K. (2007): Indirect energy associated with Swedish road transport. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research; 7(3), pp. 183–200.10.18757/EJTIR.2007.7.3.3388
  2. [2] Federici, M., S. Ulgiati, et al. (2003): Efficiency and sustainability indicators for passenger and commodities transportation systems. The case of Siena, Italy. Ecological Indicators; 3, pp. 155–169.10.1016/S1470-160X(03)00040-2
  3. [3] Caroll, M. (2010); An Investigation into Concrete Composite Strengthening of a Continuous Wrought Iron Railway Bridge using Precast Concrete Deck Slabs Bridge, University of Surrey, MSc Thesis.
  4. [4] Network Rail (2006): Railway Bridges Today and Tomorrow, Proceedings of the conference, UK.
  5. [5] Olofsson, I., Elfgren, L., Bell, B., Paulsson, B., Niederleithinger, E., Sandager, J., Jensen, Feltrin G., Täljsten, B., Cremona, C., Kiviluoma, R., Bien, J. (2005): Assessment of European railway bridges for future traffic demands and longer lives – EC project “Sustainable Bridges”, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering; 1(2), pp. 93–100.10.1080/15732470412331289396
  6. [6] Lounis Z. et al. (2010): Towards sustainable design of highway bridges. National Research Council of Canada.10.1201/b10430-178
  7. [7] Stengel, T., Schießl, P. (2009): Life cycle assessment of UHPC bridge constructions: Sherbrooke footbridge, Kassel Gärtnerplatz footbridge and Wapello road bridge. Architecture civil engineering environment, 1/2009, pp. 109–118
  8. [8] Brühwiler E., Denarié E. (2008): Rehabilitation of concrete structures using Ultra-High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concrete, in Proceedings UHPC-2008: The Second International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete, March 05–07, 2008, Kassel, Germany. Kassel University Press, pp. 895–902.
  9. [9] Denarié, E. & Brühwiler, E. (2006a): Structural rehabilitations with Ultra High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concretes, International Journal for Restoration of Buildings and Monuments, Aedificatio; 12(5 and 6), 453–467.10.1515/rbm-2006-6083
  10. [10] Denarié et al. (2006b): Full scale application of UHPFRC for the rehabilitation of bridges – from the lab to the field, Deliverable SAMARIS D22http://samaris.zag.si/.
  11. [11] Denarié et al. (2006c): Guidance for the use of UHPFRC for rehabilitation of concrete highway structures, Deliverable SAMARIS D25bhttp://samaris.zag.si/.
  12. [12] Šajna, A., Strupi-Šuput, J., Denarie, E., Brühwiler, E., Habert, G., Rossi, P., Reščič, L., Wierzbicki, T. (2010): Composite UHPFRC-concrete construction for rehabilitation - most recent advances and applications. V: Frangopol, Dan M. (ur.). Bridge maintenance, safety and management and life-cycle optimization: proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 11–15 July 2010. Boca Raton [etc.]: CRC Press, cop. 2010, pp. 445–44610.1201/b10430-342
  13. [13] Denarie, E., Habert, G., Šajna, A. (2009): Recommendations for the use of UHPFRC for composite structural members: rehabilitation Log Čezsoški bridge. Brussels: FEHRL, 2009. 58 p. http://arches.fehrl.org/?m=7&id_directory=1622
  14. [14] Fifer Bizjak, K., Knez, F., Lernart, S., Slanc, K. (2016): Life-cycle assessment and repair of the railway transition zones of an existing bridge using geocomposite materials. Structure and infrastructure engineering, ISSN 1573-2479, Apr. 2016, pp. 1–14.
  15. [15] Roth, A., Kåberger, T. (2001): Making transport systems sustainable. Journal of Cleaner Production; 10 (2002), pp. 361–371.10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00052-X
  16. [16] EN ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework (ISO 14040:2006)
  17. [17] EN ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines (ISO 14044:2006)
  18. [18] PCR – Product Category Rules for prepairing an Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for Interurban railway transport services of passengers UN CPC 6421, Railway transport services of freight UN CPC 6512 and Railways UP CPC 53212 PCR 2009:03 Ver 1.0, The international EPD Consortium.
  19. [19] Džajić I, Klofutar J., Mikulić T., Stipanovič oslaković I., Šajna A., Vajdić M. (2015): Deliverable 3.3 Rehabilitation of bridges and Tunnels. Recommendations for the rehabilitation of engineering structures (bridges and tunnels) on the existing railway track with balastless track system. University College Dublin.
  20. [20] University of Stuttgart and PE Europe (2007): Users manual Gabi 4.4, University of Stuttgart.
  21. [21] Sleeswijk, A.W., van Oers L.F.C.M., Guinée, J.B., Struijs J., Huijbregts M. (2008): Normalisation in Product Life Cycle Assessment: An LCA of the Global and European Economic Systems in the Year 2000. Science of the Total Environment; 390, pp. 227–240.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.09.04017996278
Language: English
Page range: 183 - 198
Submitted on: Aug 23, 2016
|
Accepted on: Sep 30, 2016
|
Published on: Feb 18, 2017
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Karmen Fifer Bizjak, Aljoša Šajna, Katja Slanc, Friderik Knez, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.