References
- [1] Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products and repealing Council Directive 89/106/EEC, Official Journal of the European Union, 43 p.
- [2] EN 197-2:2014: Cement-Part 2: Conformity evaluation.
- [3] Lawrence, C.D. (1998): The Constitution and Specification of Portland Cements, In: Hewlett, P.C. (Ed): Lea´s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, London: Arnold, pp. 131-194.
- [4] Tsamatsoulis, D., Nikolakakos, N. (2012): Investigation of Some Basic Parameters Affecting the Optimum Sulfates Content of Cement, In: Balas, V.E., Koksal, M. (Eds.): Recent Researches in Circuits and Systems, Proceedings of the 16th WSEAS International Conference on Circuits and Systems, Kos Island, Greece. WSEAS Press, pp. 152-157.
- [5] Odler, I. (1998): Hydration, setting and hardening of Portland cement, In: Hewlett, P.C. (Ed): Lea´s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, London: Arnold, pp. 260-263.
- [6] Scrivener, K., Skalny, J. (2004): International RILEM Workshop on Internal Sulfate Attack and Delayed Ettringite Formation. Proceedings pro035: International RILEM Workshop on Internal Sulfate Attack and Delayed Ettringite Formation, 316 p.
- [7] ASTM C150-07 Standard Specification for Portland Cement.
- [8] EN 197-1: 2011: Cement. Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements.
- [9] Stutzman, P., Heckert, A., Tebbe, A., Leigh, S. (2014): Uncertainty in Bogue-calculated phase composition of hydraulic cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 61-62, 40-48.
- [10] ISO/IEC 17025/2007: General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.
- [11] Guide To The Expression Of Uncertainty In Measurement. ISO: Geneva (1993).
- [12] (ISBN 92-67-10188-9) (Reprinted 1995: Reissued as ISO Guide 98-3 (2008), also
- [13] Available from http://www.bipm.org as JCGM 100:2008)
- [14] EURACHEM/CITAT Guide CG4, Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurements. EURACHEM: Teddington, 3rd Edition, Ellison, S.L.R, Williams, A. (eds), 2012, 135 pp.
- [15] EUROLAB Technical Report No. 1/2007 (2007): Measurement uncertainty revised: alternative approaches to uncertainty evaluation. Available on: http:// www.eurolab.org/documents/Technical_Report_Measurement_Uncertainty_2007.pdf.
- [16] Uusitalo, L., Lehikoinen, A., Helle, I., Myberg, K. (2015): An overview of methods to evaluate uncertainty of deterministic models in decision support. Environmental Modelling & Software, 63, pp. 24-31.
- [17] NT Technical report (2012): A handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories. NORDTEST, pp. 46.
- [18] EN 196-2:2013, Methods of testing cement - Part 2: Chemical analysis of cement
- [19] Jarvis, B., Corry, J.E.L., Hedges, A.J. (2007): Estimates of measurement uncertainty from proficiency testing schemes, internal laboratory quality monitoring and during routine enforcement examination of foods. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 103, pp. 462-467.
- [20] Lyn, J.A., Ramsey, M.H., Damant, A.P., Wood, R. (2007): Empirical versus modelling approaches to the estimation of measurement uncertainty caused by primary sampling. Analyst, 132, pp. 1231-1237.
- [21] ISO 13528, Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by inter-laboratory comparison.