Classification of total nasal obstruction in 10,033 cases by 4-phase –rhinomanometry
References
- 1. Zicari A.M., Rugiano A., Ragusa G., Savastano V., Bertin S., Vittori T., Duse M. - The evaluation of adenoid hypertrophy and abstruction grading based on rhinomanometry after nasal decongestant in children. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci., 2013;17(21):2962-2967.
- 2. Merkle J., Kohlhas L., Zadoyan G., Mösges R., Hellmich M. - Rhinomanometric reference intervals for normal total airflow resistance. Rhinology, 2014;52(4):292-299. doi: 10.4193/Rhin13.220.
- 3. Vogt K., Jalowayski A.A., Althaus W., et al. - 4-Phase-Rhinomanometry (4PR) - basics and practice 2010. Rhinology, 2010;Suppl. 21:1-50.
- 4. Vogt K., Wernecke K.D., Behrbohm H., Gubisch W., Argale M. - Fourphase rhinomanometry: a multicentric retrospective analysis of 36,563 clinical measurements. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol., 2015;273(5):1185-1198. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3723-5. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
- 5. Shelton M., Eiser N. - Evaluation of active and posterior rhinomanometry in normal subjects. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci., 2007;17(2):178-182.
- 6. Jones A.S., Lancer J.M., Stevens J.C., Beckingham E. - Rhinomanometry: do the anterior and posterior methods give equivalent results? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci., 1987;12(2):109-114. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1987.tb00171.x
- 7. Moore M., Eccles R. - Normal nasal patency: problems in obtaining standard values for the surgeon. J Laryngol Otol., 2012;126(6):563-569. doi: 10.1017/S00222151120045X. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
- 8. Andre R.F., Vuyk H.D., Ahmed A., Graamans K., Nolst-Trenité G.J. - Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway.A systematic review of the highest level of incidence. Clin Otolraryngol., 2009;34(6):518-525. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.02042.x.
- 9. Savovic S., Smajic M., Molnar S., Jovancevic L., Buljcik-Cupic M., Kljajic V., Pilija V. - Correlation between subjective and objective nasal breathing assessments in examinees with nasal septum deformities. Vojnos anit Pregl., 2013;70(4):380-385. doi:10.2298/VSP1304380S.
- 10. Wong E.H.C., Eccles R. - Comparison of classic and 4-phase rhinomanometry methods, is there a difference? Rhinology, 2014;52(4):360-365. doi: 10.4193/Rhin.
- 11. Clement P.A., Halewyck S., Gordts F., Michel O. - Critical evaluation of different objective techniques of nasal airway assessment: a critical review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol., 2014;271(10):2617-2625. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2870-9. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
Language: English
Page range: 149 - 160
Published on: Aug 4, 2016
Published by: Romanian Rhinologic Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2016 Klaus Vogt, Klaus-Dieter Wernecke, Mara Argale, Krista Kaulina, published by Romanian Rhinologic Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.