Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Classification of total nasal obstruction in 10,033 cases by 4-phase –rhinomanometry Cover

Classification of total nasal obstruction in 10,033 cases by 4-phase –rhinomanometry

Open Access
|Aug 2016

References

  1. 1. Zicari A.M., Rugiano A., Ragusa G., Savastano V., Bertin S., Vittori T., Duse M. - The evaluation of adenoid hypertrophy and abstruction grading based on rhinomanometry after nasal decongestant in children. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci., 2013;17(21):2962-2967.
  2. 2. Merkle J., Kohlhas L., Zadoyan G., Mösges R., Hellmich M. - Rhinomanometric reference intervals for normal total airflow resistance. Rhinology, 2014;52(4):292-299. doi: 10.4193/Rhin13.220.10.4193/Rhin13.220
  3. 3. Vogt K., Jalowayski A.A., Althaus W., et al. - 4-Phase-Rhinomanometry (4PR) - basics and practice 2010. Rhinology, 2010;Suppl. 21:1-50.
  4. 4. Vogt K., Wernecke K.D., Behrbohm H., Gubisch W., Argale M. - Fourphase rhinomanometry: a multicentric retrospective analysis of 36,563 clinical measurements. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol., 2015;273(5):1185-1198. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3723-5. Epub 2015 Jul 22.10.1007/s00405-015-3723-5482480726198284
  5. 5. Shelton M., Eiser N. - Evaluation of active and posterior rhinomanometry in normal subjects. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci., 2007;17(2):178-182.
  6. 6. Jones A.S., Lancer J.M., Stevens J.C., Beckingham E. - Rhinomanometry: do the anterior and posterior methods give equivalent results? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci., 1987;12(2):109-114. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1987.tb00171.x10.1111/j.1365-2273.1987.tb00171.x3581488
  7. 7. Moore M., Eccles R. - Normal nasal patency: problems in obtaining standard values for the surgeon. J Laryngol Otol., 2012;126(6):563-569. doi: 10.1017/S00222151120045X. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
  8. 8. Andre R.F., Vuyk H.D., Ahmed A., Graamans K., Nolst-Trenité G.J. - Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway.A systematic review of the highest level of incidence. Clin Otolraryngol., 2009;34(6):518-525. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.02042.x.10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.02042.x20070760
  9. 9. Savovic S., Smajic M., Molnar S., Jovancevic L., Buljcik-Cupic M., Kljajic V., Pilija V. - Correlation between subjective and objective nasal breathing assessments in examinees with nasal septum deformities. Vojnos anit Pregl., 2013;70(4):380-385. doi:10.2298/VSP1304380S.10.2298/VSP1304380S
  10. 10. Wong E.H.C., Eccles R. - Comparison of classic and 4-phase rhinomanometry methods, is there a difference? Rhinology, 2014;52(4):360-365. doi: 10.4193/Rhin.10.4193/Rhin24618620
  11. 11. Clement P.A., Halewyck S., Gordts F., Michel O. - Critical evaluation of different objective techniques of nasal airway assessment: a critical review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol., 2014;271(10):2617-2625. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2870-9. Epub 2014 Jan 20.10.1007/s00405-013-2870-924442716
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rjr-2016-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2393-3356 | Journal ISSN: 2069-6523
Language: English
Page range: 149 - 160
Published on: Aug 4, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Klaus Vogt, Klaus-Dieter Wernecke, Mara Argale, Krista Kaulina, published by Romanian Rhinologic Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.