Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy; A comparison of axial vs. sagittal probe location Cover

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy; A comparison of axial vs. sagittal probe location

Open Access
|Jun 2017

References

  1. 1. MANNO C, STRIPPOLI GF, ARNESANO L. Predictors of bleeding complications in percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy. Kidney Int 2004; 66:1570-7.10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00922.x
  2. 2. WHITTIER WL, KORBET SM. Timing of complications in percutaneous renal biopsy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15:142-7.10.1097/01.ASN.0000102472.37947.14
  3. 3. TAKASHI M, TAKAGI Y, SAKATA T, et al., Clinicopathological characteristics of small renal carcinomas. Int Urol Nephrol. 1994; 26:621-629.10.1007/BF02767715
  4. 4. CAMPBELL SC, NOVICK AC, HERTS B, et al., Prospective evaluation of fine needle aspiration of small, solid renal masses: accuracy and morbidity. Urology. 1997; 50:25-29.10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00111-8
  5. 5. BRIERLY RD, THOMAS PJ, HARRISON NW, et al., Evaluation of fineneedle aspiration cytology for renal masses. BJU Int. 2000; 85:14-18.10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00417.x10619937
  6. 6. HARA I, MIYAKE H, HARA S, et al., Role of percutaneous image-guided biopsy in the evaluation of renal masses. Urol Int. 2001; 67:199-202.10.1159/00005098711598445
  7. 7. CAOILI EM, BUDE RO, HIGGINS EJ, et al., Evaluation of sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179:373-378.10.2214/ajr.179.2.179037312130435
  8. 8. NEUZILLET Y, LECHEVALLIER E, ANDRE M, et al., Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses. J Urol. 2004; 171:1802-1805.10.1097/01.ju.0000120147.51090.2b15076280
  9. 9. NYMAN RS, CAPPELEN-SMITH J, BRISMAR J, et al., Yield and complications in ultrasound guided biopsy of abdominal lesions. Comparison of fine needle aspiration biopsy and 1.2-mm needle core biopsy using an automated gun. Acta Radiol 1995; 36:485-90.10.1177/028418519503600435
  10. 10. HERGESELL O, FELTEN H, ANDRASSY K, et al., Safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy-retrospective analysis of 1090 consecutive cases. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13: 975-977.10.1093/ndt/13.4.9759568860
  11. 11. MEOLA M, BARSOTTI G, CUPISTI A, et al., Free-hand ultrasound-guided renal biopsy: report of 650 consecutive cases. Nephron 1994; 67: 425-430.10.1159/000188016
  12. 12. MANNO C, STRIPPOLI GFM, ARNESANO L, et al., Predictors of bleeding complications in percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy. Kidney Int 2004; 66: 1570-1577.10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00922.x
  13. 13. STILES KP, YUAN CM, CHUNG EM, et al., Renal biopsy in high-risk patients with medical diseases of the kidney. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36: 419-433.10.1053/ajkd.2000.8998
  14. 14. FINE DM, AREPALLY A, HOFMANN LV, et al., Diagnostic utility and safety of transjugular kidney biopsy in the obese patient. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19: 1798-180210.1093/ndt/gfh246
  15. 15. CRISTALLINI EG, PAGANELLI C, BOLIS GB. Role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the assessment of renal masses. Diagn Cytopathol. 1991; 7:32-35.10.1002/dc.2840070110
  16. 16. JUUL N, TORP-PETERSON S, GRONVALL F, et al., Ultrasonically guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of renal masses. J Urol. 1985; 133:579-581.10.1016/S0022-5347(17)49096-3
  17. 17. CONSTANTIN A, BRISSON ML, KWAN J, PROULX F. Percutaneous US-guided Renal Biopsy: A Retrospective Study Comparing the 16-gauge End-cut and 14-gauge Side-notch Needles. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21:357-361.10.1016/j.jvir.2009.11.00520133155
  18. 18. YESUDAS SS, GEORGY NK, MANICKAM S, et al., Percutaneous real-time ultrasound-guided renal biopsy performed solely by nephrologists: A case series. Indian J Nephrol. 2010; 20(3):137-41.10.4103/0971-4065.70844296697921072153
  19. 19. MUKHTAR KN, MAHMOOD SN, UMAIR SF. CT guided percutaneous renal biopsy versus ultrasound guided for obtaining adequate tissue. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012; 62(9)_ 880-882.
  20. 20. KUMAR A, MITCHELL MJ, AGGARWAL S, FRASER DB, TRILLO AA. Ultrasonography-directed native renal biopsy: comparison of an automated biopsy device with a needle system. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1992; 43(5):359-63.
  21. 21. CHISHTI I, BURHAN D, HAIDER Z, SAJJAD Z. Renal biopsy: ultrasound guided renal biopsy using a caudal angulated needle path to improve cortical sampling. Pakistan journal of radiology. 2008; 18(3): 74-76.
  22. 22. SKALOVA S, REJTAR P. Safety profile of paediatric percutaneous ultrasonography-guided renal biopsies. Singapore Med J 2010; 51(6): 481-483.
  23. 23. CORAPI KM, CHEN JL, BALK EM, GORDON CE. Bleeding complications of native kidney biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012; 60(1):62-73.10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.02.33022537423
  24. 24. MAYA ID, MADDELA P, BARKER J, ALLON M. Percutaneous Renal Biopsy: Comparison of Blind and Real-Time Ultrasound-Guided Technique. Seminars in Dialysis. 2007; 20(4): 355-358.10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00295.x17635829
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rjim-2017-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2501-062X | Journal ISSN: 1220-4749
Language: English
Page range: 96 - 102
Submitted on: Oct 22, 2016
Published on: Jun 6, 2017
Published by: N.G. Lupu Internal Medicine Foundation
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Farnaz Shamshirgar, Seyed Morteza Bagheri, published by N.G. Lupu Internal Medicine Foundation
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.