Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Role of Duke treadmill score in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease in women Cover

Role of Duke treadmill score in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease in women

Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume 53 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)
By: Alexandra Dǎdârlat,  D. Zdrenghea and  Dana Pop  
Open Access
|Oct 2015

References

  1. 1. NEWBY KL, DOUGLAS PS. Cardiovascular disease in women. In: Bonow RO, Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P. Braunwald’s Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 9th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2011;1757-1769.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. MOSCA L, BENJAMIN EJ, BERRA K, BEZANSON JL, DOLOR RJ, LLOYD-JONES DM, et al. Effectiveness-Based Guidelines for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Women – 2011 Update: a guideline from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123: 1243-1262.10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820faaf8318214321325087
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. ALFONSO F, BERMEJO J, SEGOVIA J. Cardiovascular disease in women. Why now? Rev Esp Cardiol 2006; 59: 259-263.10.1157/13086083
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. STRAMBA-BADIALE M, FOX KM, PRIORI SG, COLLINS P, DALY C, GRAHAM I, et al. Cardiovascular diseases in women: a statement from the policy conference of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 994-1005.10.1093/eurheartj/ehi81916522654
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. WENGER NK, SHAW LJ, VACCARINO V. Coronary heart disease in women: update 2008. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008; 83: 37-51.10.1038/sj.clpt.610044718043680
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. PILOTE L, DASGUPTA K, GURU V, HUMPHRIES KH, MCGRATH J, NORRIS C, et al. A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease. CMAJ 2007; 176: S1-S41.10.1503/cmaj.051455181767017353516
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. ANDREOTTI F, MARCHESE N. Women and coronary heart disease. Heart 2008; 94: 108-116.10.1136/hrt.2005.07276918083955
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. ANAND S, ISLAM S, ROSENGREN A, FRANZOSI MG, STEYN K, YUSUFALI AH, et al. Interheart Investigators. Risk factors for myocardial infarction in women and men: insights from the INTERHEART study. Eur Heart J. 2008; 29: 932-940.10.1093/eurheartj/ehn01818334475
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. GO AS, MOZAFFARIAN D, ROGER VL, BENJAMIN EJ, BERRY JD, BORDEN WB, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2013 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013; 127:e6-e245.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. POP D, DĂDÂRLAT A, ZDRENGHEA D. Novel cardiovascular risk markers in women with ischaemic heart disease. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2014; 25(3):137-4.10.5830/CVJA-2014-014412012525000444
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28:1462–1536.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Coordinating Committee of the National Cholesterol Education Program. Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. Circulation. 2004; 110: 227-239.10.1161/01.CIR.0000133317.49796.0E15249516
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. ZDRENGHEA D, POP D. Testarea de efort în practica medicală. Ed. Clusium, Cluj-Napoca. 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. MIERES JH, SHAW LJ, ARAI A, BUDOFF MJ, FLAMM SD, HUNDLEY WG, et al. Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association. et al. Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: Consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention American Heart Association. Circulation 2005; 111: 682-696.10.1161/01.CIR.0000155233.67287.6015687114
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. CRILLY M, BUNDRED P, HU X, LECKEY L, JOHNSTONE F. Gender differences in the clinical management of patients with angina pectoris: a cross-sectional survey in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res 2007; 7: 142-150.10.1186/1472-6963-7-142
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. DALY C, CLEMENS F, LOPEZ SENDON JL, TAVAZZI L, BOERSMA E, DANCHIN N, et al. EURO HEART SURVEY INVESTIGATORS. Gender differences in the management and clinical outcome of stable angina. Circulation 2006; 113: 490-498.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.561647
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. POP D, SITAR-TǍUT A, ZDRENGHEA D. Cardiopatia ischemicǎ. In: Mitu F, Pop D, Zdrenghea D. Particularităţi ale patologiei cardiovasculare la femei. Editura Pim. Iaşi. 2012; 87-110.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. KOHLI P, GULATI M. Exercise stress testing in women: going back to the basics. Circulation. 2010; 122:2570-80.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.914754
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. ALEXANDER KP, SHAW LJ, SHAW LK, DELONG ER, MARK DB, PETERSON ED. Value of exercise treadmill testing in women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32:1657-64.10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00451-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. KLIGFIELD P, LAUER MS. Exercise electrocardiogram testing: beyond the ST segment. Circulation. 2006; 114:2070–2082.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.56194417088475
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. MARK DB, SHAW L, HARRELL FE JR, LEE KL, BENGTSON JR, MCCANTS CB, et al. Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325:849–853.10.1056/NEJM1991091932512041875969
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. GULATI M, ARNSDORF MF, SHAW LJ, PANDEY DK, THISTED RA, LAUDERDALE DS, et al. Prognostic value of the duke treadmill score in asymptomatic women. Am J Cardiol. 2005; 96:369-75.10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.03.07816054460
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. ADEKUNLE AE, AKINTOMIDE AO. Gender differences in the variables of exercise treadmill test in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Afr Med. 2012; 11:96-102.10.4103/1596-3519.9353222406669
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. LAKKIREDDY DR, BHAKKAD J, KORLAKUNTA HL, RYSCHON K, SHEN X, et al. Prognostic value of the Duke Treadmill Score in diabetic patients. Am Heart J. 2005; 150:516-21.10.1016/j.ahj.2004.09.05816169334
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. RAFIE AH, DEWEY FE, MYERS J, FROELICHER VF. Age-adjusted modification of the Duke Treadmill Score nomogram. Am Heart J. 2008; 155:1033-8.10.1016/j.ahj.2008.01.02518513516
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rjim-2015-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2501-062X | Journal ISSN: 1220-4749
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 146 - 152
Published on: Oct 14, 2015
Published by: N.G. Lupu Internal Medicine Foundation
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
women,
Duke score,
ischemic heart disease
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Internal medicine,
Internal medicine, other,
Cardiology,
Gastroenterology,
Rheumatology

© 2015 Alexandra Dǎdârlat, D. Zdrenghea, Dana Pop, published by N.G. Lupu Internal Medicine Foundation
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 53 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)Next article