Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The effect of the degree of foreign ownership on firms' performance Cover

The effect of the degree of foreign ownership on firms' performance

Open Access
|Mar 2016

References

  1. AITKEN, B. & HARRISON, A. (1999) Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela.. 89 (3), pp. 605-617. DOI:
  2. AKIMOVA, I. & SCHWÖDIAUER, G. (2004) Ownership structure, corporate governance and enterprise performance: empirical results from Ukraine.. 10 (1), pp. 28-42.
  3. AMOLD, J. M. & JAVORCIK, B.S. (2005) Gifted kids or pushy parents? Foreign acquisitions and plant performance in Indonesia.. 197.
  4. AYDIN, N., SAYIM, M. & YALAMA, A. (2007) Foreign ownership and firm performance: evidence from Turkey.. 11, pp. 103-110.
  5. AZZAM, I., FOUAD, J. & GHOSH, D. K. (2013) Foreign ownership and financial performance: evidence from Egypt.. 18 (3), pp. 232-254.
  6. BARBOSA, N. & LOURI, H. (2005) Corporate performance: does ownership matter? Comparison of foreign and domestic owned firms in Greece and Portugal.. 27 (1), pp. 73-102. DOI:
  7. BIJSTERBOSCH, M. & KOLASA, M. (2010) FDI and productivity convergence in Central and Eastern Europe: an industry-level investigation.145 (4), pp. 689-712. DOI:
  8. BLOMSTRÖM, M. (1988) Labor productivity differences between foreign and domestic firms in Mexico.16 (11), pp. 1295-1298. DOI:
  9. BLOMSTRÖM, M. & SJÖHOLM, F. (1998) Technology transfers and spillovers: does local participation with multinationals matter?. 43 (4-6), pp. 915-923.
  10. BOARDMAN, A. E., SHAPIRO, D.M. & VINING, A. R. (1997) The role of agency costs in explaining the superior performance of foreign MNE subsidiaries.. 6 (3), pp. 295–317. DOI:
  11. BROWN, J. D., EARLE, J. S. & TELEGDY, Á. (2006) The productivity effects of privatization: longitudinal estimates from Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine.114 (1), pp. 61-99. DOI:
  12. CAVES, R. E. (2007)3edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. CHHIBBER, P. K. & MAJUMDAR, S. K. (1999) Foreign ownership and profitability: property rights, control, and the performance of firms in Indian industry.. 42 (1), pp. 209 - 238. DOI:
  14. DIMELIS, S. & LOURI, H. (2002) Foreign ownership and production efficiency: a quantile regression analysis.. 54, pp. 449–469. DOI:
  15. DOMS, M. & JENSEN, J.B. (1995) Comparing wages, skills, and productivity between domestically and foreign-owned manufacturing establishments in the United States. In: Baldwin, R. E. & Lipsey, R. E. & J Richardson, J. D. (eds.).. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  16. DRAHOKOUPIL, J. (2008) The investment-promotion machines: the politics of foreign direct investment promotion in Central and Eastern Europe.. 60 (2), pp. 197-225. DOI:
  17. GELÜBCKE, J. P. W. (2013) The performance of foreign affiliates in German manufacturing: Evidence from a new database.149 (1), pp. 151-182. DOI:
  18. GOETHALS, J. & OOGHE, H. (1997) The performance of foreign and national take-overs in Belgium.. 97 (1), pp. 24-37. DOI:
  19. GRABOWSKI, H. G. & MUELLER, D. C. (1978) Industrial research and development, intangible capital stocks, and firm profit rates.9 (2), pp. 328-343. DOI:
  20. GREENAWAY, D., GUARIGLIA, A. & YU, Z. (2014) The more the better? Foreign ownership and corporate performance in China.. 20 (7-9). pp. 681-702. DOI:
  21. HALKOS, G. E. & TZEREMES, N. G. (2010) The effect of foreign ownership on SMEs performance: an efficiency analysis perspective.34, pp. 167-180. DOI:
  22. HOWENSTINE, N. G. & ZEILE, W. J. (1994) Characteristics of foreign-owned U.S. manufacturing establishments.. 74 (1), pp. 34-59.
  23. HUANG, R. D. & SHIU, C. Y. (2009) Local effects of foreign ownership in an emerging financial market: Evidence from qualified foreign institutional investors in Taiwan.. 38 (3), pp. 567-602. DOI:
  24. JARQUE, C. M. & BERA, A. K. (1980) Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals.. 6 (3), pp. 255-259. DOI:
  25. JAVORCIK, B. S. (2004) Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkage.94 (3), pp. 605-627. DOI:
  26. KONINGS, J. (2000) The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firm.. 9 (3), pp. 619-633. DOI:
  27. KIM, W. S. & LYN, E. O. (1990) FDI theories and the performance of foreign multinationals operating in the U.S.21 (1), pp. 41-54. DOI:
  28. LECRAW, D. J. (1984) Bargaining power, ownership, and profitability of transnational corporations in developing countries.. 15 (1), pp. 27-43. DOI:
  29. LIU, X., PARKER, D., VAIYDA, K. & WEI, Y. (2000) The impact of foreign direct investment on labour productivity in the Chinese electronic industry.. United Kingdom: Lancaster University Management School.
  30. MOSER, B. K. & STEVENS, G. R. (1992) Homogeneity of variance in the two-sample means test.. 46 (1), pp. 19-21.
  31. NAKANO, M. & NGUYEN, P. (2013) Foreign ownership and firm performance: evidence from Japan’s electronics industry.. 23, pp. 41-50. DOI:
  32. ROSS, S.A., CHAMBERS, S. & JOHNSTON, R. (2002). 6edn. New York: Mcgraw-Hill College.
  33. STUDENT (1908) The Probable Error Of a Mean.6 (1), pp. 1-25. DOI:
  34. SUCHÁNEK, P., RICHTER, J. & KRÁLOVÁ, M. (2014) Customer satisfaction, product quality and performance of companies.14 (4), pp. 329-344. DOI:
  35. SUCHÁNEK, P. & ŠPALEK, J. (2012) Quality and performance of the company in the Czech Republic.60 (4), pp. 351-362. DOI:
  36. ŠESTÁKOVÁ, M. (2008). Bratislava: Ekonomický ústav SAV.
  37. TANGEN, S. (2003) An overview of frequently used performance measures.. 52 (7), pp. 347-354. DOI:
  38. WELCH, B. L. (1947) The generalization of “Student's” problem when several different population variances are involved.34 (1-2), pp. 28-35.
  39. WILLMORE, L. (1986) The comparative performance of foreign and domestic firms in Brazil.. 14 (4), pp. 489-502. DOI:
  40. YASAR, M. & PAUL, C. J. M. (2009) Size and foreign ownership effects on productivity and efficiency: an analysis of Turkish motor vehicle and parts plants.. 13 (4), pp. 576–591. DOI:
  41. ZEMPLINEROVÁ, A. (2010) Innovation activity of firms and competition.. 58 (6), pp. 747-760.
  42. ZEMPLINEROVÁ, A. & HROMÁDKOVÁ, E. (2012) Determinants of firm’s innovation.. 21 (4), pp. 487-503. DOI:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2016-0003 | Journal eISSN: 1804-1663 | Journal ISSN: 1213-2446
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 44
Submitted on: Jun 30, 2015
Accepted on: Jan 29, 2016
Published on: Mar 17, 2016
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
JEL:

© 2016 Aneta Bobenič Hintošová, Zuzana Kubíková, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.