Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Governmental Research Support Programs and Private Entities in Slovakia Cover

Governmental Research Support Programs and Private Entities in Slovakia

Review of Economic Perspectives
Volume 14 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)
By: Zuzana Maliková,  Matúš Kubák,  Radovan Bačík and  Miloš Fišar  
Open Access
|Jan 2015

References

  1. AGHION, P.; HOWITT, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica. 1992, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 323-351.10.2307/2951599
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. ARROW, K. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. 1962. ISBN: 0-87014-304-2.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. BALÁŽ, V. (2005). Politika Inovácií V Slovenskej Republike. Politická ekonomie. 2005, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 513-526.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. BARAJAS, A.; HUERGO, E. (2010). International R&D cooperation within EU framework programe: the case of spanish firms. In Economics of Innovation and new technology - Special Issue on the Role and Dynamics of Corporate R&D. 2010, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 87-111.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. BUSOM, I. (2000). Empirical evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies. In Economics of innovation and new technology. 2000. Vol. 9, No.2, pp. 111-148.10.1080/10438590000000006
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. CZARNITZKI, D.; FIER, A. (2002). Do innovation subsidies crowd out private investment? Evidence from German service sector. Applied Economics Quarterly. 2002, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 1-25.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. ČAPLÁNOVÁ, A.; SIVÁK, R.; HUDSON, J. (2012). Vplyv priamych zahraničných investícií na inovačnú činnosť firiem. Politická ekonomie. 2012, Vol 60, No. 6, pp. 764779.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. DUBRAVSKÁ, M.; Širá, E. (2014). Analýza vybraných ukazovatel'ov rozvoja ino-vatívneho prostredia v SR a ČR. In XVII. mezinárodní kolokvium o regionálních vědách. Sborník příspěvků. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, (ISBN 978-80-210-6840-7, p. 194-200)10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-6840-2014-23
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. DUGUET, E. (2004). Are subsidies a substitute or a complement to privately funded R&D? Evidence from France using propensity score methods for non-experimental data. Revue Economie Politique. 2004, Vol. 114. No. 2 pp. 263-292.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. EUROPEAN COMISSION. (2011). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2011. [PRO INNO Europe®]. European Union 2012. ISBN 978-92-79-23174-2. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ius-2011_en.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. EUROPEAN COMISSION. (2011). Lessons from a Decade of Innovation Policy -What can be learnt from the INNO Policy TrendChart and The Innovation Union Scoreboard - Executive Summary.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. EUROPEAN COMISSION. (2013). Research and Innovation Performance in Slovakia -Country Profile. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 97892-79-30866-6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. GEOGHEGAN-QUINN, M. (2010). Address by Commissioner Máire Geoghegan-Quinn to the Joint Oireachtas Committee on European Affairs. Príspevok prezentovaný pred Joint Oireachtas Committee on European Affairs, Dublin, 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/ireland/press_office/speeches-press_releases/maire-geoghegan-quinn-speech-european-affairs-committee_en.htm
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. GRIFFITH, R. (2000). How important is business R&D for economic growth and should the government subsidise it? London: Institue for Fiscal studies, 2000. ISBN 1903274-13-3.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. GROSSMAN, G. M.; HELPMAN, E. (1994). Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of Growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1994. Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 23-44.10.1257/jep.8.1.23
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. HERRERA L.; IBARRA B. (2010). Distribution and effect of R&D subsidies: A comparative analysis according to firm size. Intangible capital. 2010. Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 272299.10.3926/ic.2010.v6n2.p272-299
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. HESHMATI, A.; LOOF, H. (2005). The impact of public funds on private R&D investment. New evidence from a firm level innovation study [MTT Discussion Papers 3 -11682] Agrifood Research Finland. 2005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. HULYA, U. (2004). R&D, innovation, and economic growth: an empirical analysis [Working Paper No. 04/185] International Monetary Fund: Research department, 2004.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. JONES, C. (1995). R&D based model of economic growth. Journal of political economy. 1995, Vol. 103, No. 4, pp. 759-784.10.1086/262002
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. JONES C.; WILIAMS J. (2000). Too Much of a Good Thing? The Economics of Investment in R&D . Journal of Economic Growth. 2000, Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 65-85.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. KOTULIČ, R. (2006). Foreign Direct Investments and Their Influence on Economic Growth and Regional Development. Review of Economic Perspectives. 2006. No. 2, pp. 15-25. ISSN: ISSN 1804-1663.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. KUNCL, M. (2010). Cesta k obnově růstu: inovace, pracovní místa a čistý růst (globální fórum OECD 2010 v Paříži). Politická ekonomie. 2010, Vol. 48, No. 6, pp. 830 - 837.10.18267/j.polek.766
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. LACH S. (2002). Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel. The journal of industrial economics. 2002, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 369-390.10.1111/1467-6451.00182
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. LEVIN, R. C., KLEVORICK, A. K., NELSON, R. R., WINTER, S. G. (1987). Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1987, Vol. 3, pp. 783-832.10.2307/2534454
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. LUCAS R. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of monetary economics. 1988. Vol. 22, No.1, pp. 3-42.10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. MANSFIELD, E.; SCHWARTZ, M.; WAGNER, S. (1981). Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study. Economic Journal. 1981, Vol. 91, pp. 907-918.10.2307/2232499
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC. (2011). Minerva 2.0 -Slovensko do prvej ligy. Uznesenie vlády Slovenskej republiky.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC. (2014). Čerpanie štruktu-rálnych fondov, Kohézneho fondu a Európskeho fondu pre rybné hospodárstvo k 31.12.2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. MINISTRY OF ECONOMY OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC. (2007). Inovačná straté-gia SR na roky 2007 až 2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE, RESEARCH AND SPORT OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC. (2010). Dlhodobý zámer štátnej vednej a technickej politiky do roku 2015.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. PESSOA, A. (2010). R&D and economic growth: How strong is the link? Economic Letters. 2010, Vol. 107, No. 2, pp. 152-154.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. PRNO, I. (2008). Investičná a inovačná politika. Bratislava: Merkury s.r.o, 2008. 218 s. ISBN 978-80-89143-85-6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. ROMER, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy. 1990, Vol. 5, No. 98, pp. 71-102.10.1086/261725
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. SEGERSTROM, P.S.; T. C. A. ANANT, T., C., A.; DINOPOULOS,. (1990). A Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle. The American Economic Review. 1990, Vol. 80, No. 5, pp. 1077-1091.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Science and Technology Policy (n.d.). Retrieved July 17, 2014, from http://sovva.sk/science-and-technology-policy
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. ÚRAD VLÁDY SLOVENSKEJ REPUBLIKY. 2010. Lisabonská stratégia a Slovensko. 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. ZACHARIADIS M. (2004). R&D, innovation, and technological progress: a test of the Schumpeterian framework without scale effects. Canadian Journal of Economics. 2003, Vol. 36, No.3, pp. 566-586.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. ZEMPLINEROVÁ, A. (2010). Inovační aktivita firem a konkurence. Politická ekonomie. 2010, Vol. 58, No. 6, pp. 747-760.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. ZENG J. (2000). Innovative vs. imitative R&D and economic growth. Journal of Development economics. 2000, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 499-528.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0004 | Journal eISSN: 1804-1663 | Journal ISSN: 1213-2446
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 345 - 371
Published on: Jan 29, 2015
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
research,
development,
innovation,
subsidy,
logit regression,
Slovakia
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Economic theory, systems and structures

© 2015 Zuzana Maliková, Matúš Kubák, Radovan Bačík, Miloš Fišar, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 14 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)Next article