Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The Use of Statistical Methods for Determining Attribute Weights and the Influence of Attributes on Property Value

Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. Armstrong, R. A. (2019). Should Pearson’s correlation coefficient be avoided? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics I, 39, 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12636 PMID:3142362410.1111/opo.12636
  2. Babatunde, I. O. (2018). Examining Heuristics for Building – Work-In-Progress Valuations in Niger State Nigeria. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 26(2), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2018-001910.2478/remav-2018-0019
  3. Barańska, A. M. (2019a). Correlation Analysis in the Process Of Weighting Real Property Attributes. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 27(4), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2019-003710.2478/remav-2019-0037
  4. Barańska, A. M. (2019b). Linear and Nonlinear Weighing of Property Features. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 27(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2019-000610.2478/remav-2019-0006
  5. Dmytrów, K., Gdakowicz, A., & Putek-Szeląg, E. (2019). Statistical Relations of the Qualitative Attributes of Real Properties Subject oo Mass Appraisal. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 19(2), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2019-001110.2478/foli-2019-0011
  6. Doszyń, M. (2017). Statistical Determination of Impact of Property Attributes for Weak Measurement Scales. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 25(4), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1515/remav-2017-003110.1515/remav-2017-0031
  7. Doszyń, M. (2019). Individual Capacities of Hellwig’s Information Carriers and the Impact of Attributes in the Szczecin Algorithm of Real Estate Mass Appraisal. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 27(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2019-000210.2478/remav-2019-0002
  8. Gaca, R., & Sawiłow, E. (2014). Zastosowanie współczynników korelacji rang Spearmana do ustalenia wag cech rynkowych nieruchomości, Rzeczoznawca Majątkowy, nr 82, pp. 24-30 (Application of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient for establishing ranks of real estate characteristics. Real Estate Appraiser, (82), 24–30.
  9. Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1963). Measures of association for cross classification. III: Approximate sampling theory. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 310–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.1050085010.1080/01621459.1963.10500850
  10. Gaca, R. (2018). Parametric and Non-Parametric Statistical Methods in the Assessment of the Effect of Property Attributes on Prices. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 26(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2018-001810.2478/remav-2018-0018
  11. Foryś, I., & Gaca, R. (2016). Application of the Likert and Osgood Scales to Quantify the Qualitative Features of Real Estate Properties. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 16(2), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/foli-2016-002110.1515/foli-2016-0021
  12. Foryś, I., & Gdakowicz, A. (2004). Wykorzystanie metod ilościowych do badania rynku nieruchomości (The application of quantitative methods for real estate market analysis). Studia i Materiały Towarzystwa Naukowego Nieruchomości, 12(1).
  13. Hozer, J., Foryś, I., Zwolankowska, M., Kokot, S., & Kuźmiński, W. (1999). Ekonometryczny algorytm masowej wyceny nieruchomości gruntowych (An Econometric Algorithm for Land Mass Appraisal). Katedra Ekonometrii i Statystyki Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Stowarzyszenie Pomoc i Rozwój.
  14. Hozer, J., Gnat, S., Kokot, S., & Kuźmiński, W. (2019). The Problem of Designating Elementary Terrains for the Purpose of Szczecin Algorithm of Real Estate Mass Appraisal. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 27(3), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2019-002410.2478/remav-2019-0024
  15. Kendall, M. G. (1948). Rank Correlation Methods. Charles Griffin & Company Limited.
  16. Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006 PMID:2149651310.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
  17. Powszechne Krajowe Zasady Wyceny. (2008). Nota Interpretacyjna, Zastosowanie podejścia porównawczego w wycenie nieruchomości (Common National Valuation Rules, Interpretative Note, Application of the Comparative Approach to Property Valuation), Polska Federacja Stowarzyszeń Rzeczoznawców Majątkowych. http://wycena.net.pl/standardy/NIZastosowanie.podejscia.porownawczego.pdf.
  18. Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1988). Nonparametrics statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  19. Doszyń, M. (Ed.). (2020). System kalibracji macierzy wpływu atrybutów w szczecińskim algorytmie masowej wyceny nieruchomości (Calibration system of attribute impact matrix in Szczecin algorithm of real estate mass appraisal). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.
  20. Walesiak, M. (2016). Uogólniona miara odległości GDM w statystycznej analizie wielowymiarowej z wykorzystaniem programu R. Wydanie drugie poprawione i rozszerzone (A General Dissimilarity Measure in Multi-variate Statistical Analysis with Application of R Program. Second revised and extended edition). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego.
Language: English
Page range: 33 - 47
Published on: Dec 12, 2020
Published by: Real Estate Management and Valuation
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Anna Gdakowicz, Ewa Putek-Szeląg, published by Real Estate Management and Valuation
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.