Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Genetic Algorithm as Automated Valuation Model Component in Real Estate Investment Decisions System

Real Estate Management and Valuation
Volume 28 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)
By:
Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. Adamowicz, M. & Janulewicz, P. (2012). Wykorzystanie metod wielowymiarowych w określeniu pozycji konkurencyjnej gminy na przykładzie województwa lubelskiego [The use of multi dimensional methods in defining the competitive position f the community on the example Lubelskie voivodeship]. Metody ilościowe w badaniach ekonomicznych, 13(1), 17 – 28.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Ahn, J. J., Byun, H. W., Oh, K. J., & Kim, T. Y. (2012). Using ridge regression with genetic algorithm to enhance real estate appraisal forecasting. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 8369–8379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.18310.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.183
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Andrejkova, G., Marčišinová, K. & Kudela, K. (2019). Genetic algorithms in the prediction of geomagnetic storms.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Awange, J., Palancz, B., Lewis, R., & Volgyesi, L. (2018). Genetic algorithms. Mathematical Geosciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67371-410.1007/978-3-319-67371-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Bąk, A. (2016). Porządkowanie liniowe obiektów metodą hellwiga i topsis – analiza porównawcza [Linear ordering of objects using hellwig and topsis methods a comparative analysis]. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 426, 22 – 31. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2016.426.0210.15611/pn.2016.426.02
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Bertalanffy, L. (1984). Ogólna teoria systemów [General syste theory]. PWN.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Brzezicka, J. (2016). Znaczenie heurystyki zakotwiczenia i dostosowania w procesie wartościotwórczym na rynku nieruchomości [Significance of anchoring and adjustent heuristic in the proces of value creaton on the real estate market]. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Administratio Locorum, 15(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.48010.31648/aspal.480
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Brzezicka, J., Łaszek, J., Olszewski, K., & Waszczuk, J. (2019). Analysis of the filtering process and the ripple effect on the primary and secondary housing market in Warsaw, Poland. Land Use Policy, 88, 104098. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.10409810.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104098
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Burnside, C., Eichenbaum, M., & Rebelo, S. (2016). Understanding Booms and Busts in Housing Markets. Journal of Political Economy, 124(4), 1088–1147. https://doi.org/10.3386/w1673410.3386/w16734
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Chodak, G., & Kwaśnicki, W. (2002). Zastosowanie algorytmów genetycznych w prognozowaniu popytu (Application of Genetic Algorithms in Demand). Gospodarka Materiałowa i Logistyka, 4, 2–7.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Cierpisz, S., & Kowalik, S. (2000). Zastosowanie algorytmu genetycznego do optymalizacji układu technologicznego produkcji mieszanki węgla [Application of genetic algorithm to optimize the proces of coal blend production]. Mechanizacja i Automatyzacja Górnictwa, 12, 5–11.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Czech, P. (2007). Wykorzystanie algorytmów genetycznych do doboru wejść klasyfikatora uszkodzeń zębów kół przekładni opartego na sieci neuronowej PNN oraz krótkoczasowej transformacie Fouriera [The use of genetic algorithms in the task of choosing inputs for PNN neural network classifier of faults of gera – tooth which used inputs from STFT analysis]. Problemy eksploatacji, 3, 51–70.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Czechowska, K. (2014). Wybrane uwarunkowania podejmowania decyzji inwestycyjnych na rynku nieruchomości – ujęcie behawioralne [Selected Determinants of Investment Decision on the Real Estate Markets – Behavioral Approach]. Studia i Prace Wydziały Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 36(1), 13–25.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. d’Amato, M., Źróbek, S., Renigier-Biłozor, M., Walacik, M., & Mercadante, G. (2019). Valuing the effect of the change of zoning on underdeveloped land using fuzzy real option approach. Land Use Policy, 86, 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.04210.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.042
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P., & Forte, F. (2017). Using Genetic Algorithms for Real Estate Appraisals. Buildings, 7(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings702003110.3390/buildings7020031
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P., Forte, F., & Manganelli, B. (2017). Real Estate Appraisals with Bayesian Approach and Markov Chain Hybrid Monte Carlo Method: An Application to a Central Urban Area of Naples. Sustainability, 9(11), 2138. https://doi.org/10.3390/su911213810.3390/su9112138
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Dubinskas, P., & Urbšienė, L. (2017). Investment portfolio optimalization by applying a genetic algorithm – based approach. Ekonomika (Nis), 96(2), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2017.2.1099810.15388/Ekon.2017.2.10998
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. European Mortgage Federation and European AVM Alliance. (2016). EMF/EAA joint paper on the use of automated valuation models in Europe.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. European Valuation Standards. (2017). EVGN11 The Valuer’s Use of Statistical Tools. TEGoVA.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Figielska, E. (2006). Algorytmy ewolucyjne i ich zastosowania. Zeszyty Naukowe Warszawskiej Wyższej Szkoły Informatyki, 1, 81–92.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search optimalization and machine learning. Addison – Wesley Longman Publishing.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Gu J., Zhu, M., & Jiang, L. (2011). Housing price forecasting based on genetic algorithm and support vector machine. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3383–3386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.12310.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.123
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Helbich, M., Brunauer, W., Vaz, E., & Nijkamp, P. (2014). Spatial heterogeneity in hedonic house price models: The case of Austria. Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 51(2), 390–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/004209801349223410.1177/0042098013492234
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. IAAO. (2018). Standard on Automated Valuation Models, Approved September 2003, Revised July 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. International Valuation Standards. (2005). International Valuation Standards (7th ed.).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Janowski, A., Bobkowska, K., & Szulwic, J. (2018). 3D modelling of cylindrical-shaped objects from lidar data-an assessment based on theoretical modelling and experimental data. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 25(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.24425/11815610.24425/118156
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Juan, Y., Kim, J. H., Roper, K., & Castro-Lacouture, D. (2009). GA-based decision support system for housing condition assessment and refurbishment strategies. Automation in Construction, 18(4), 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.00610.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Bardauskienė, D., &Dargis, R. (2015). Sustainable Development of Real Estate: monograph. Vilnius Technika. https://doi.org/10.3846/2336-M10.3846/2336-M
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Kauko, T. (2017). Pricing and Sustainability of Urban Real Estate. Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Kauko, T., & d’Amato, M. (2008). Mass Appraisal Mathods, An interpersonal perspective for property valuers. Wiley-Blackwell., https://doi.org/10.1002/978144430102110.1002/9781444301021
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Kontrimas, V., & Verikas, A. (2011). The mass appraisal of the real estate by computational intelligence. Applied Soft Computing, 11(1), 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.12.00310.1016/j.asoc.2009.12.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Kou, G., Lu, Y., Peng, Y., & Shi, Y. (2012). Evaluation of classification algorithms using MCDM and rank correlation. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 11(01), 197–225. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021962201250009510.1142/S0219622012500095
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Kotowski, S. (2008). Analiza algorytmów genetycznych jako układów dynamicznych. PhD thesis, Instytut Podstawowych Problemów Techniki Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Warszawa, Poland.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Kumar, S., Jain, S., & Sharma, H. (2018). Genetic Algorithms. In N. Nhu Gia (Ed.), Anand, N., Dac – Nhuong, L (pp. 27–52). Advances in Swarm Intelligence for Optimizing Problems in Computer Science.10.1201/9780429445927-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Lee, I. (2018). Modern Genetic Algorithms. Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, 8 – 11. https://doi.org/10.3938/PhiT.27.00210.3938/PhiT.27.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Levitt, S. D., & Syverson, Ch. (2008). Market Distortions When Agents Are Better Informed: The Value of Information in Real Estate Transactions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4), 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.90.4.59910.1162/rest.90.4.599
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Lin, Ch., Lee, I., & Wu, M. (2019). Merits of using chromosome representations and shadow chromosomes in genetic algorithms for solving scheduling problems. Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing, 58, 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.01.00510.1016/j.rcim.2019.01.005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Ławrynowicz, A. (2011). Genetic algorithms for solving scheduling problems in manufacturing sysmems. The Journal of Warsaw University of Technology, 3(2), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10238-012-0039-210.2478/v10238-012-0039-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Matti, M. S., & Khorsheed Al-Sulaifanie, A. (2018). Wavelet Denoising Based on Genetic Algorithm. In 2018 International Conference on Advanced Science and Engineering, Duhok, Iraq (pp. 75 – 80). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOASE.2018.854881410.1109/ICOASE.2018.8548814
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Omiotek, Z., & Wójcik, W. (2014). Zastosowanie metody Hellwiga do redukcji wymiaru przestrzeni cech obrazów USG tarczycy [The use of Hellwig’s method for dimension reduction in feature space of thyroid ultrasound images]. Informatyka, Automatyka. Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska, 4(3), 14–17. https://doi.org/10.5604/20830157.112133310.5604/20830157.1121333
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Pereira, R. (2000). Genetic Algorithm Optimization for Finance and Investments. MPRA Paper 8610. University Library of Munich.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Rao, R. C. (1994). Statystyka i prawda [Statistics and truth]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Renigier-Biłozor, M., & Biłozor, A. (2016). Informatio Capacity Database in the Rating Model on the Basis of Polish and Italian Real Estate Markets. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 24(3), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1515/remav-2016-002010.1515/remav-2016-0020
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Renigier-Biłozor, M., Biłozor, A., & d’Amato, M. (2018). Residential market ratings using fuzzy logic decision-making procedures. Economic Research Journal, 31(1), 1758–1787. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.148478510.1080/1331677X.2018.1484785
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Renigier – Biłozor, M., Biłozor, A. & Wiśniewski, R. (. (2017). Rating engineering of real estate markets as the condition of urban areas assessment. Land Use Policy, 61, 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.04010.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.040
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Rosienkiewicz, M. (2012). Porównanie metod Akaike i Hellwiga w zakresie efektywności konstrukcji modelu regresyjnego [Efficiency comparison of Akaike and Hellwig methods in constructing regression model]. Wiadomości statystyczne, 10, 27 – 43.10.59139/ws.2012.10.3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Rutkowski, L. (2009). Metody i techniki sztucznej inteligencji. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Stokey, N. L. (2016). Wait-and-See: Investment Options under Policy Uncertainty. Review of Economic Dynamics, 21, 246–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2015.06.00110.1016/j.red.2015.06.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Su, D., Xin, L., Lobonţ, O., & Yanping, Z. (2016). Economic Policy Uncertainty and Housing Returns in Germany. Journal of Economics and Business, 34(1), 43–61.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. TEGoVA The European Group of Valuers Associations. (2016). European Valuation Standards: Automated Valuation Models (AVMs).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. USPAP Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice 2016 – 2017. (2016).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Van Groenendaal, W. J. H. (2003). Group decision support for public policy planning. Information & Management, 40(5), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00044-710.1016/S0378-7206(02)00044-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Vandeva, E. (2012). MultiObjective Genetic Modified Algorithme (MOGMA). Cybernetics and Information Technologies, 12(2), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2012-001010.2478/cait-2012-0010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Wang, X., Wen, J., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2014). Real estate price forecasting based on SVM optimized by PSO. Optik (Stuttgart), 125(3), 1439–1443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.09.01710.1016/j.ijleo.2013.09.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. Winiczenko, R. (2008). Algorytmy genetyczne i ich zastosowania [Genetic algoritms and their applications]. Postępy Techniki Przetwórstwa Spożywczego, 1, 107–110.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. Wojarnik, G. (2015). Metody ewolucyjne w analizie zmian kursu akcji spółek giełdowych [Evolutionary methods for the analysis of the changes in price of compay stock excgange]. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia Informatica Pomerania., 36, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.18276/si.2015.36-0310.18276/si.2015.36-03
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. Wu, Q., Wu, P., Zhou, L. G., Chen, H. Y., & Guan, X. J. (2018). Some new Hamacher aggregation operators under single-valued neutrosophic 2-tuple linguistic environment and their applications to multi-attribute group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 116, 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.12.02410.1016/j.cie.2017.12.024
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. Zavadskas, E. K., Antuchevciene, J., & Chatterjee, P. (2018). Mulitple – Criteria Decision – Making (MCDM) Techniques for Busisness Processes Information Management. Informations, 10(1), 4. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3390/info1001000410.3390/info10010004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Turskis, Z., & Adeli, H. (2016). Hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making methods: A review of applications in engineering. Scientia Iranica, 23(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2016.209310.24200/sci.2016.2093
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. Zavadskas, E., Bausys, R., Kaklauskas, A., Ubarte, I., Kuzminske, A., & Gudiene, N. (2017). Sustainable market valuation of buildings by the single-valued neutrosophic MAMVA method. Applied Soft Computing, 57(C), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.03.04010.1016/j.asoc.2017.03.040
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  61. Zavadskas, E., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2008). Selection of the effective dwelling house walls by applying attributes values determined at intervals. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 14(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.310.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  62. Zavadskas, E., & Turskis, Z. (2011). Daugiatiksliai sprendimų priėmimo metodai ekonomikoje: Apžvalga [Multiple criteria decision making (mcdm) methods in economics: an overview]. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(2), 397–427. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.59329110.3846/20294913.2011.593291
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  63. Ziółkowski, P., & Niedostatkiewicz, M. (2019). Machine Learning Techniques in Concrete Mix Design. Materials (Basel), 12(8), 1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12081256 PMID:3099955710.3390/ma12081256
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/remav-2020-0027 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5289
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 14
Published on: Dec 12, 2020
Published by: Real Estate Management and Valuation
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
genetic algorithm (GA),
uncertainty,
decision support system,
automated valuation model (AVM),
real estate market
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Political economics, other

© 2020 Aneta Chmielewska, Jerzy Adamiczka, Michał Romanowski, published by Real Estate Management and Valuation
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 28 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)Next article