Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Social robotics to help children with autism in their interactions through imitation Cover

Social robotics to help children with autism in their interactions through imitation

Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. Ackermann, E. (2002). Ambienti di gioco programmabili: cos’è possibile per un bambino di quattro anni. TD-Tecnologie Didattiche, 27, 48-55.
  2. Ansuini, C., Cavallo, A., Bertone, C. & Becchio, C. (2015). Intentions in the Brain: The Unveiling of Mister Hyde. The Neuroscientist 21(2), 126–135. DOI: 10.1177/107385841453382710.1177/1073858414533827
  3. Battegazzorre, P. (2009). Bee-bot, fare robotica con un giocattolo programmabile a banalità limitata. Atti Didamatica: Retrieved from http://www.itctannoia.it/Didamatica/2009/lavori/battegazzore.pdf.
  4. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness, An essay on blindness and theory of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4635.001.0001
  5. Benitez, A., Cala A. (2007). Market research. Report del progetto IROMEC. www.iromec.org
  6. Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 167-175.10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00373-1
  7. Caci, B. (2004). Laboratorio di robotica: una palestra per la mente. Proceeding del Congresso Nazionale dell’Associazione Italiana di Psicologia (AIP), Sezione di Psicologia Sperimentale, Sciacca.
  8. Cardaci, M., Caci, B.& D’Amico, A. (2004). La robotica nella riabilitazione di soggetti autistici e con deficit cognitivi. Proceedings of the conference “Tecnologie Digitali e l’Intelligenza Artificiale al Servizio dei Disabili”. Italy: University of Palermo.
  9. Cavallo, A., Koul, A., Ansuini, C., Capozzi, F. & Becchio, C. (2016). Decoding intentions from movement kinematics. Scientific Reports, 6:37036. DOI: 10.1038/srep3703610.1038/srep37036
  10. Conti, D., Di Nuovo, S., Buono, S., Trubia, G. & Di Nuovo, A. (2015). Use of robotics to stimulate imitation in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A pilot study in a clinical setting. Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Kobe. Japan.10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333589
  11. Cook, A.M. & Polgar, J.M. (2008). Cook & Hussey’s Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.
  12. Cook, A.M, Adams, K., Volden, J., Harbottle, N. & Harbottle, C. (2011). Using Lego robots to estimate cognitive ability in children who have severe physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6 (4), 338-346.10.3109/17483107.2010.534231
  13. D’Ambrosio, M. Mirabile, Miglino, O. (2003). Uno studio pilota sull’impiego di giocattoli robotici nella riabilitazione cognitiva. Proceedings of the National Congress of the Italian Psychology Association (AIP). Bari, Italy.
  14. Dautenhahn, K., Werry, I., Ogden, B. & Harwin, W. (2001). Can Social Interaction Skills Be Taught by a Social Agent? The Role of a Robotic Mediator. Autism Therapy, Proceedings CT, The Fourth International Conference on Cognitive Technology: Instruments of Mind (CT2001). University of Warwick, United Kingdom, Springer Verlag.
  15. Dautenhahn, K. & Robins, B. (2007). Learning and Interaction in Children with Autism. VI IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning, London, United Kingdom, July 11-13.
  16. Dautenhahn, K., Nehaniv, C., Walters, M., Robins, B., Kose-Bagci, H., Mirza, A. & Blow, M. (2009). KASPAR - A Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot for Human-Robot Interaction Research, to appear. Special Issue on “Humanoid Robots” for Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 6, 3–4, 369–397.10.1155/2009/708594
  17. De Graaf, M.M.A. & Ben Allouch, S. (2013). Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Rob. Auton. Syst., 61, 1476–148610.1016/j.robot.2013.07.007
  18. Di Nuovo, S., De La Cruz, V., Conti, D., Buono, S., Di Nuovo, A. (2014). Mental Imagery: rehabilitation through simulation. Life Span and Disability 17, 1, 89-118
  19. Duquette, A., Michaud, F. & Mercier, H. (2008). Exploring the use of a mobile robot as an imitation agent with children with low-functioning autism. Auton. Robots, 24, 147–15710.1007/s10514-007-9056-5
  20. Erwin, B. (2001). Creative Projects with LEGO Mindstorms. Boston: Addison-Wesley Pub Co.
  21. Feil-Seifer, D. & Matarić, M.J. (2005). Defining Socially Assistive Robotics. Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR 2005, 465-468.
  22. Feil-Seifer, D. & Matarić M.J. (2009). Toward Socially Assistive Robotics for Augmenting Interventions for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, 54, 201-210.10.1007/978-3-642-00196-3_24
  23. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I. & Dautenhahn K. (2003). A Survey of Socially Iteractive Robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42 (3-4), pp. 143-166.10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X
  24. Garbati, M. (2012). Robotica: sempre più presente nella nostra vita. Retrieved from http://www.torinoscienza.it/dossier/robotica_sempre_piu_presente_nella_nostra_vita_22645.html 30/05/2014.
  25. Goodrich, M., Colton, M., Brinton, B. & Fujiki, M. (2011). A case for lowdose robotics in autism therapy. Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human/Robot Interaction, 143-144.10.1145/1957656.1957702
  26. Gouaillier, D., Hugel, V., Blazevic, P., Kilner, C., Monceaux, J., Lafourcade, P., Marnier, B., Serre, J.& Maisonnier, B. (2009). Mechatronic design of NAO humanoid. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2124-212910.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152516
  27. Harel I. &Papert, S. (1991). Constructionism. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  28. IROMEC Consortium, Deliverable 1.0. User needs report, www.iromec.org
  29. Johnson, M.H. & Morton, J. (1991). Biology and Cognitive Development: The case of face recognition. Blackwell: Oxford.
  30. Kim, K.J., Park, E. & Shyam Sundar, S. (2013). Caregiving role in human-robot interaction: A study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence. Computer Human Behavior 29, 1799–1806.10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.009
  31. Kulk, J. & Welsh, J. (2008). A Low Power Walk for the NAO Robot. Retrieved from http://www.araa.asn.au/acra/acra2008/papers/pap117s1.pdf?origin=publication_detail 10.03. 20172014
  32. Lehmann, H., Marti, P. & Robins, B. (2011). Robots as social mediators for children with Autism - A preliminary analysis comparing two different robotic platforms. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) and the International Conference on Epigenetic Robotics (EpiRob), Frankfurt, Germany, 24-27 August.
  33. Leroux, P. (1999). Educational Robotics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, pp. 1080-1089.
  34. Marti, P. (2005). L’interazione Uomo-Robot. Ergonomia 2, 50-57.
  35. Marti, P. & Giusti, L. (2009). A robot Companion for Inclusive Games: a user-centred design perspective. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, 3-8 maggio.
  36. Norman, D.A. (1994). How Might People Interact with Agents. Communications of the ACM 37 (7), July 1994, 68-71.10.1145/176789.176796
  37. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computer, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
  38. Papert, S. (1993). The Children’s Machine. Rethinking school in the age of computer. New York: Basic Books.
  39. Pearson, Y. & Borenstein, J. (2013). The Intervention of Robot Caregivers and the Cultivation of Children’s Capability to Play. Science and Engineering Ethics. 19 (1), 123-137.10.1007/s11948-011-9309-8
  40. Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1966). La Psychologie de l’enfant. Paris: PUF.
  41. Rabbitt, S.M, Kazdin, A.L & Scassellati, B. (2014). Integrating Socially Assistive Robotics into Mental Healthcare Interventions: Applications and Recommendations for Expanded Use. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Feb;35:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.07.00110.1016/j.cpr.2014.07.001
  42. Rakison, D.H. & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2001). The developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 209-228.10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.209
  43. Robins, B. & Dautenhahn, K. (2014), Tactile Interactions with a Humanoid Robot: Novel Play Scenario Implementations with Children with Autism. International Journal of Social Robotics. Retrieved from http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/578/art%253A10.1007%252Fs12369-014-0228-0.pdf?auth66=1404289696_ff11915700c75528370176e76e39777f&ext=.pdf 12.03.201710.1007/s12369-014-0228-0
  44. Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K. & Dickerson, P. (2009). From isolation to communication: a case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot, Procs of 2nd Int Conf on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction: ACHI'09. vol. 2009, IEEE, 205-211. DOI: 10.1109/ACHI.2009.3210.1109/ACHI.2009.32
  45. Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Te Boekhorst, R. & Billard, A. (2005). Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills?, Univers. Access Inf. Soc., 4, 2, 105–12010.1007/s10209-005-0116-3
  46. Scassellati, B., Admoni, H. & Matarić, M. (2012). Robot for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 14, 275-294.10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150036
  47. Scholl, B.J. &Tremoulet, P.D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Cognitive Science, 4, pp 22-28.10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01506-0
  48. Shibata, T., Wada, K., Saito, T. & Tanie K. (2001). Mental Commit Robot and its Application to Therapy of Children. Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference On AIM 01, Como, Italy.10.1109/AIM.2001.936838
  49. Smith, L.B. & Heise, D. (1992). Perceptual similarity and conceptual structure. In Burn, B. Percepts, concepts and categories. Ed. Elseiver.10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61009-2
  50. Strollo, M.R. (2008). Scienze cognitive e aperture pedagogiche. Nuovi orizzonti nella formazione degli insegnanti, Franco Angeli, Milano.
  51. Tapus, A., Matarić, M.J.& Scassellati, B. (2007). Socially assistive robotics. Grand Challenges of Robotics, IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag.,14
  52. Villano M., Crowell C.R., Wier K., Tang K., Thomas B., Shea N., … Diehl J.J. (2011), DOMER: A Wizard of Oz interface for using interactive robots to scaffold social skills for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Human-Robot Interaction, 279-280.10.1145/1957656.1957770
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rem-2017-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2037-0849 | Journal ISSN: 2037-0830
Language: English
Page range: 10 - 16
Published on: Oct 10, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Valentina Pennazio, published by SIREM (Società Italiana di Ricerca sull’Educazione Mediale)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.