Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Focused transhepatic electroporation mediated by hypersaline infusion through the portal vein in rat model. Preliminary results on differential conductivity Cover

Focused transhepatic electroporation mediated by hypersaline infusion through the portal vein in rat model. Preliminary results on differential conductivity

Radiology and Oncology
Volume 51 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)
By: Clara Pañella,  Quim Castellví,  Xavier Moll,  Rita Quesada,  Alberto Villanueva,  Mar Iglesias,  Dolores Naranjo,  Patricia Sánchez-Velázquez,  Anna Andaluz,  Luís Grande,  Antoni Ivorra and  Fernando Burdío  
Open Access
|Nov 2017

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

IRE application model with plate electrodes, in scattered tumoural liver without (A) or with (B) hypersaline infusion through the portal vein and its corresponding numerical simulation (C and D) obtained from the received electric field in healthy and tumoural tissue - own results obtained from our previous research (17, 18). (C) Without hypersaline infusion through the portal vein, there is not selective effect on scattered tumoural nodules. Nevertheless, in (D) with hypersaline infusion through the portal vein, there is an increase on the electric field on scattered tumours (meaning a preferential ablative IRE effect on these nodules) because of the increase in healthy tissue conductivity (σ).
IRE application model with plate electrodes, in scattered tumoural liver without (A) or with (B) hypersaline infusion through the portal vein and its corresponding numerical simulation (C and D) obtained from the received electric field in healthy and tumoural tissue - own results obtained from our previous research (17, 18). (C) Without hypersaline infusion through the portal vein, there is not selective effect on scattered tumoural nodules. Nevertheless, in (D) with hypersaline infusion through the portal vein, there is an increase on the electric field on scattered tumours (meaning a preferential ablative IRE effect on these nodules) because of the increase in healthy tissue conductivity (σ).

Figure 2

General setting of the hypersaline infusion protocol through the portal vein in Sprague Dawley rats (A) and in Athimic rats with implanted tumour (B). After exposing spleen at abdominal midline, hypersaline infusion was performed by trans-splenic puncture with a pump. Hyposaline infusion through the jugular vein was performed to compensate the systemic hypernatremia. Two tetrapolar setup electrodes measured tumour and healthy hepatic conductivity and data were collected with a multi-frecuency device and gathered in a computer.
General setting of the hypersaline infusion protocol through the portal vein in Sprague Dawley rats (A) and in Athimic rats with implanted tumour (B). After exposing spleen at abdominal midline, hypersaline infusion was performed by trans-splenic puncture with a pump. Hyposaline infusion through the jugular vein was performed to compensate the systemic hypernatremia. Two tetrapolar setup electrodes measured tumour and healthy hepatic conductivity and data were collected with a multi-frecuency device and gathered in a computer.

Figure 3

Conductivity changes after hypersaline infusion protocol in a representative case of group A (Sprague Dawley) and B (Athimic rats with implanted tumour). In both groups, a sharp increase and a posterior slowing decrease of conductivity in healthy hepatic tissue was observed. On the contrary, conductivity of the tumoural tissue (Group B) was stable. Thus, it created a therapeutic window (TW), the safety period where IRE it would be applied.
Conductivity changes after hypersaline infusion protocol in a representative case of group A (Sprague Dawley) and B (Athimic rats with implanted tumour). In both groups, a sharp increase and a posterior slowing decrease of conductivity in healthy hepatic tissue was observed. On the contrary, conductivity of the tumoural tissue (Group B) was stable. Thus, it created a therapeutic window (TW), the safety period where IRE it would be applied.

Figure 4

These were representative livers from group A (Sprague Dawley) and group B (Athimic rats with implanted tumour) after HI protocol at the 4th week of postoperative. Histological analysis revealed the indemnity of the architecture and morphology of healthy hepatocytes (H) of both groups A and B. In group B, histological samples showed that HI protocol did not interfere in tumour (T) evolution.
These were representative livers from group A (Sprague Dawley) and group B (Athimic rats with implanted tumour) after HI protocol at the 4th week of postoperative. Histological analysis revealed the indemnity of the architecture and morphology of healthy hepatocytes (H) of both groups A and B. In group B, histological samples showed that HI protocol did not interfere in tumour (T) evolution.

Comparison between two groups A (Sprague Dawley) and B (Athimic)_ *PO: Postoperative

GROUP Ap-valueGROUP Bp-value
Administration of HI protocoln= 9n=8
Weight increase during PO* (grams)100±30.570.012-1.94±37.810.386
Baseline Conductivity in healthy tissue (S/m)0.10±0.020.13±0.02
Conductivity after HI in healthy tissue (S/m)0.27±0.750.0080.49±0.170.008
Baseline Conductivity in tumour tissue (S/m)NA0.24±0.03
Therapeutic window (sec)NA175±115
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2017-0051 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 415 - 421
Submitted on: Jul 2, 2017
|
Accepted on: Oct 22, 2017
|
Published on: Nov 29, 2017
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
irreversible electroporation,
liver tumour,
electrical conductivity
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Internal medicine,
Haematology, oncology,
Radiology

© 2017 Clara Pañella, Quim Castellví, Xavier Moll, Rita Quesada, Alberto Villanueva, Mar Iglesias, Dolores Naranjo, Patricia Sánchez-Velázquez, Anna Andaluz, Luís Grande, Antoni Ivorra, Fernando Burdío, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 51 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)Next article