Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Association between SLC19A1 gene polymorphism and high dose methotrexate toxicity in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and non Hodgkin malignant lymphoma: introducing a haplotype based approach Cover

Association between SLC19A1 gene polymorphism and high dose methotrexate toxicity in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and non Hodgkin malignant lymphoma: introducing a haplotype based approach

Open Access
|Sep 2017

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of children with ALL/NHML and MTX treatment toxicity

CharacteristicALL patients
(N = 88)
Gender (%)
 Male41 (46.6)
 Female47 (53.4)
Median age at diagnosis, years (range)4.58 (0.3–16.6)
Median body surface area, m2 (range)0.73 (0.4–1.9)
Leukaemia subtype (%);
 B-cell72 (81.8)
 T-cell13 (14.7)
 Undetermined3 (3.4)
Median No. leukocytes at diagnosis, 109 cells/L (range)9.35 (1–1650)
Median No. thrombocytes at diagnosis, 109 cells/L (range)72 (3–553)
Median haemoglobin conc., g/l (range)84 (43–148)
Median % of blasts at diagnosis (range)23.5 (0–97)
Median MTX dose, mg (range)3300 (540–9200)
MTX responsePresent, N (%)
Relapse8 (9.2)**
Exitus4 (4.6)**
All MTX-induced ADEs*48 (54.5)
 Leukopenia33 (37.5)
 Thrombocytopenia16 (18.2)
 Mucositis15 (17.0)
 Neurotoxicity7 (8.0)**

** data is missing for one patient

** data is missing for one patient

* data was collected after the first cycle of MTX

** data is missing for one patient

Table 2

The influence of rs2838958 genotype on mucositis development - univariate logistic regression analysis

Degree of moscositisrs2838958 genotypeOR(95%CI)P
TT (%)TC + CC (%)
018 (66.7)53 (89.8)reference
14 (14.8)4 (6.8)0.340 (0.077–1.500)0.154
24 (14.8)2 (3.4)0.170 (0.029–1.007)0.051
41 (3.7)0 (0.0)-*
1–49 (33.3)6 (10.2)0.226 (0.071–0.725)0.009
Mean value ± STD0.590.140.007

* Calculation was not possible

Table 3

The impact of SLC19A1 genotypes on the occurrence of any and specific MTX-induced adverse events using multivariate analysis – an additive model

SNP IDAny adverse eventsLeukopeniaThrombocytopeniaMucositisNeurotoxicity
ORPORPORPORPORP
(CI 95%)(CI 95%)(CI 95%)(CI 95%)(CI 95%)
rs11315900.7190.3600.6090.1501.1700.6961.2920.5790.5420.361
(0.354–1.458)(0.310–1.197)(0.532–2.576)(0.525–3.170)(0.146–2.016)
rs10512001.3920.3601.6430.1500.8550.6960.7750.5790.5420.361
(0.686–2.824)(0.836–3.230)(0.388–1.881)(0.316–1.906)(0.146–2.016)
rs28389581.2210.5831.6840.1360.5560.1720.4760.1300.4530.236
(0.599–2.490)(0.849–3.339)(0.240–1.291)(0.182–1.243)(0.122–1.677)
rs28389561.4110.3491.7420.1130.6890.3740.7050.4540.5960.434
(0.686–2.899)(0.878–3.458)(0.303–1.566)(0.283–1.759)(0.163–2.182)
rs170047850.8490.7721.3930.5450.8540.8210.6720.6061.2260.800
(0.280–2.572)(0.476–4.079)(0.218–3.349)(0.148–3.055)(0.255–5.899)
rs124833771.4750.4781.8250.2381.6880.3680.9300.9141.0610.939
(0.504–4.318)(0.672–4.956)(0.540–5.280)(0.249–3.473)(0.232–4.861)
rs28389511.2610.4830.7400.3511.6520.1852.1600.0811.6930.337
(0.666–2.412)(0.392–1.394)(0.786–3.473)(0.909–5.129)(0.577–4.967)

The estimates for the odds ratio (OR) were adjusted to the following variables: age, sex, and treatment regimen.

Figure 1

Graphic presentation of haploblocks and selected SNPs in SLC19A1.

Table 4

SLC19A1 haplotype frequencies in patients with ALL and NHML

Haplotype*FrequencyStandard error
H1 = CACCCCG0.3960.037
H2 = TGTTCCC0.3340.036
H3 = TGTTGTC0.0940.022
H4 = TGTTCCG0.0530.017
H5 = CATTCCC0.0170.010
Other0.106

* SNP rs1131596, rs1051266, rs2838958, rs2838956, rs17004785, rs12483377, rs2838951 from 5’ to 3’, respectively

Table 5

The impact of gender, age, treatment regimen and SLC19A1 haplotypes on the occurrence of any and specific (thrombocytopenia, mucositis, and neurotoxicity) MTX-induced adverse events

AllThrombocytopeniaMucositisNeurotoxicity
OR (95% CI)POR (95% CI)POR (95% CI)POR (95% CI)P
Gender2.3850.0781.6150.4131.5230.5200.5310.475
(0.908–6.259)(5.134–5.076)(0.423–5.472)(0.093–3.024)
Age1.0280.5889.5260.4401.0540.3961.0880.289
(0.931–1.134)(8.422–1.078)(0.935–1.190)(0.931–1.272)
Treatment regimen2.0500.031*9.8390.9621.6760.2551.2820.678
(1.065–3.943)(4.620–2.095)(0.689–4.075)(0.397–4.139)
H1 = CACCCCG1.0000.9436.6150.3520.4190.0960.3090.120
(0.472–2.117)(2.769–1.579)(0.150–1.167)(0.070–1.364)
H3 = TGTTGTC1.1100.8449.2200.8910.5930.5150.9510.934
(0.335–3.618)(2.254–3.750)(0.122–2.877)(0.175–5.150)
H4 = TGTTCCC0.1430.030*3.6170.3790.0050.9850.0140.992
(0.023–0.852)(4.568–2.541)(0.0–NC)(0.0–NC)
Rare haplotypes2.0020.2759.1130.8712.0020.2752.0020.275
(0.580–6.775)(2.607–3.171)(0.580–6.775)(0.580–6.775)

* p < 0.05; H2 was the reference haplotype

* p < 0.05; H2 was the reference haplotype

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2017-0040 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 455 - 462
Submitted on: Feb 14, 2017
Accepted on: Aug 18, 2017
Published on: Sep 18, 2017
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Barbara Faganel Kotnik, Janez Jazbec, Petra Bohanec Grabar, Cristina Rodriguez-Antona, Vita Dolzan, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.