Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Electrotransfer of plasmid DNA radiosensitizes B16F10 tumors through activation of immune response Cover

Electrotransfer of plasmid DNA radiosensitizes B16F10 tumors through activation of immune response

Open Access
|Feb 2017

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Response of B16F10 melanoma to different treatment modalities

Therapeutic groupDT (days)TGD (days)TFSC
nAM  SEMAM  SEMn%n%
CTRL81.2±0.10.0±0.100--
pControl81.9±0.20.7±0.200--
TS82.2±0.31.0±0.300--
3 × EP83.1±0.32.0±0.300--
3 × GET (pControl)89.4±6.58.2±2.500--
3 × GET (TS)99.5±3.28.6±3.0444375
IR91.8±0.30.7±0.300--
pControl + IR92.5±0.31.3±0.31111100
TS + IR84.0±1.22.8±1.200--
3 × EP+IR94.3±1.33.2±1.322200
3 × GET (pControl) + IR936.0±n/a34.9±n/a889563
3 × GET (TS) + IR832.0±n/a30.8±n/a788457

AM = Arithmetic mean; DT = Tumor doubling time; Groups: (CTRL = control; EP = electric pulses; GET = gene electrotransfer; IR = irradiation; TS = pETantiCD105); n = Number of all mice in the group; n/a = Not applicable; SC = Mice resistant to secondary challenge; SEM = Standard error; TF = Tumor free mice; TGD = Tumor growth delay

Histological sections of melanoma tumors on day 6 after the beginning of the therapy.

CTRL = control; EP = electric pulses; GET = gene electrotransfer; IR = irradiation; TS = pET-antiCD105

Immune response of melanoma tumors is observed by vitiligo effect.

CTRL = control; EP = electric pulses; GET = gene electrotransfer; IR = irradiation; TS = pET-antiCD105

Table 2

Immunohistological analysis of tumors

Therapeutic groupNecrosis (%)Apoptosis (%)Hypoxia (%)Proliferation (%)Vascularization (n of structures)Immune cells (n of cells)
AM  SEMAM  SEMAM  SEMAM  SEMAM  SEMAM  SEM
CTRL25.0±2.611.3±1.64.7±1.092.2±1.351.6±3.27.9±0.9
pControl20.0±2.611.6±1.05.4±1.092.1±1.247.1±4.78.3±1.1
TS21.7±2.611.4±1.55.5±0.792.7±1.050.5±4.27.9±0.7
3 × EP13.3±3.618.7±2.77.8±0.874.4±1.739.9±2.614.3±1.7
3 × GET (pControl)53.3±7.919.5±3.015.3±2.975.6±2.435.3±4.215.1±1.6
3 × GET (TS)65.8±7.626.7±2.246.3±3.049.5±3.814.9±1.119.3±1.7
IR21.7±4.218.4±1.830.2±2.453.3±3.530.1±2.326.8±2.6
pControl + IR37.5±8.018.7±1.932.3±2.554.5±4.724.5±1.826.4±2.1
TS + IR43.3±8.019.9±1.531.6±2.352.0±2.923.8±1.626.4±2.3
3 × EP + IR25.0±4.831.0±2.051.7±2.659.4±4.028.9±2.329.3±2.1
3 × GET (pControl) + IR65.0±7.638.7±3.158.0±2.846.0±4.818.9±2.045.8±3.0
3 × GET (TS) + IR79.2±4.250.3±2.466.7±1.646.7±4.812.8±1.046.5±2.1

AM = Arithmetic mean; Groups: (CTRL = control; EP = electric pulses; GET = gene electrotransfer; IR = irradiation; TS = pET-antiCD105); n = Number of structures or cells; SEM = Standard error

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2017-0011 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 30 - 39
Submitted on: Dec 20, 2016
Accepted on: Jan 18, 2017
Published on: Feb 22, 2017
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Monika Savarin, Urska Kamensek, Maja Cemazar, Richard Heller, Gregor Sersa, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.