Interdisciplinary consensus statement on indication and application of a hydrogel spacer for prostate radiotherapy based on experience in more than 250 patients

Arndt-Christian Müller; Johannes Mischinger; Theodor Klotz; Bernd Gagel; Gregor Habl; Gencay Hatiboglu; Michael Pinkawa

doi:10.1515/raon-2016-0036

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to reach a consensus on indication and application of a hydrogel spacer based on multicentre experience and give new users important information to shorten the learning curve for this innovative technique.

Methods

The interdisciplinary meeting was attended by radiation oncologists and urologists, each with experience of 23 – 138 hydrogel injections (SpaceOAR®) in prostate cancer patients before dose-escalated radiotherapy. User experience was discussed and questions were defined to comprise practical information relevant for successful hydrogel injection and treatment. Answers to the defined key questions were generated. Hydrogel-associated side effects were collected to estimate the percentage, treatment and prognosis of potential risks.

Results

The main indication for hydrogel application was dose-escalated radiotherapy for histologically confirmed low or intermediate risk prostate cancer. It was not recommended in locally advanced prostate cancer. The injection or implantation was performed under transrectal ultrasound guidance via the transperineal approach after prior hydrodissection. The rate of injection-related G2-toxicity was 2% (n = 5) in a total of 258 hydrogel applications. The most frequent complication (n = 4) was rectal wall penetration, diagnosed at different intervals after hydrogel injection and treated conservatively.

Conclusions

A consensus was reached on the application of a hydrogel spacer. Current experience demonstrated feasibility, which could promote initiation of this method in more centres to reduce radiation-related gastrointestinal toxicity of dose-escalated IGRT. However, a very low rate of a potential serious adverse event could not be excluded. Therefore, the application should carefully be discussed with the patient and be balanced against potential benefits.

References

Viani GA, Stefano EJ, Afonso SL. Higher-than-conventional radiation doses in localized prostate cancer treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 74:1405-18.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dearnaley D, Syndikus I, Sumo G, Bidmead M, Bloomfield D, Clark C, et al. Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary safety results from the CHHiP randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13:43-54.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hat iboglu G, Pinkawa M, Vallee JP, Hadaschik B, Hohenfellner M. Application technique: placement of a prostate-rectum spacer in men undergoing prostate radiation therapy. BJU Int 2012; 110:E647-52.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eckert F, Alloussi S, Paulsen F, Bamberg M, Zips D, Spillner P, et al. Prospective evaluation of a hydrogel spacer for rectal separation in dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. BMC Cancer 2013; 13: 27.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pinkawa M, Piroth MD, Holy R, Escobar-Corral N, Caffaro M, Djukic V, et al. Spacer stability and prostate position variability during radiotherapy for prostate cancer applying a hydrogel to protect the rectal wall. Radiother Oncol 2013; 106: 220-4.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Uhl M, van Triest B, Eble MJ, Weber DC, Herfarth K, De Weese TL. Low rectal toxicity after dose escalated IMRT treatment of prostate cancer using an absorbable hydrogel for increasing and maintaining space between the rectum and prostate: results of a multi-institutional phase II trial. Radiother Oncol 2013; 106: 215-19.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pinkawa M, Klotz J, Djukic V, Schubert C, Escobar-Corral N, Caffaro M, et al. Learning curve in the application of a hydrogel spacer to protect the rectal wall during radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. Urology 2013; 82: 963-8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Song DY, Herfarth KK, Uhl M, Eble MJ, Pinkawa M, van Triest B, et al. A multi-institutional clinical trial of rectal dose reduction via injected polyethylene-glycol hydrogel during intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: analysis of dosimetric outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 87: 81-7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pinkawa M, Piroth MD, Holy R, Escobar-Corral N, Caffaro M, Djukic V, et al. Quality of life after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer with a hydrogel spacer. Matched-pair analysis. Strahlenther Onkol 2012; 188: 917-25.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Uhl M, Herfarth K, Eble MJ, Pinkawa M, van Triest B, Kalisvaart R, et al. Absorbable hydrogel spacer use in men undergoing prostate cancer radiotherapy: 12 month toxicity and proctoscopy results of a prospective multicenter phase II trial. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9: 96.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Klotz T, Mathers MJ, Lazar Y, Gagel B. Use of hydrogel as spacer in Denovier’s space: optimization of IMRT radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. Urologe A 2013; 52: 1690-97.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nat ional Cancer Institute. Common terminology criteria for adverse events v.4.0 (CTCAE). 2011. [citated 14 Feb 2016]. Available from: http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beydoun N, Bucci JA, Chin YS, Malouf D, Enari E, Painter SD. First report of transperineal polyethylene glycol hydrogel spacer use to curtail rectal radiation dose after permanent iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2013; 12: 368-74.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Christodouleas JP, Tang S, Susil RC, McNutt TR, Song DY, Bekelman J, et al. The effect of anterior proton beams in the setting of a prostate-rectum spacer. Med Dosim 2013; 38: 315-9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Habl G, Hatiboglu G, Edler L, Uhl M, Krause S, Roethke M, et al. Ion Prostate Irradiation (IPI) - a pilot study to establish the safety and feasibility of primary hypofractionated irradiation of the prostate with protons and carbon ions in a raster scan technique. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:202.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nguyen PL, Devlin PM, Beard CJ, Orio PF, 3rd, O’Leary MP, Wolfsberger LD, et al. High-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer in a previously radiated patient with polyethylene glycol hydrogel spacing to reduce rectal dose: case report and review of the literature. Brachytherapy 2013; 12:77-83.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rucinski A, Bauer J, Campbell P, Brons S, Unholtz D, Habl G, et al. Preclinical investigations towards the first spacer gel application in prostate cancer treatment during particle therapy at HIT. Radiat Oncol 2013; 8: 134.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pinkawa M. Spacer application for prostate cancer radiation therapy. Future Oncol 2014; 10:851-64.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ng M, Brown E, Williams A, Chao M, Lawrentschuk N, Chee R. Fiducial markers and spacers in prostate radiotherapy: current applications. BJU Int 2014; 113 (Suppl 2): 13-20.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mal one D, Clark T, Wei N. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous injection, hydrodissection, and fenestration for carpal tunnel syndrome: description of a new technique. J Appl Res 2010; 10: 116-23.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vas avada AR, Singh R, Apple DJ, Trivedi RH, Pandey SK, Werner L. Effect of hydrodissection on intraoperative performance: randomized study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 1623-8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pinkawa M, Bornemann C, Escobar-Corral N, Piroth MD, Holy R, Eble MJ. Treatment planning after hydrogel injection during radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2013; 189:796-800.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Law ton CA, Michalski J, El-Naqa I, Buyyounouski MK, Lee WR, Menard C, et al. RTOG GU Radiation oncology specialists reach consensus on pelvic lymph node volumes for high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 74: 383-7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Habl G, Uhl M, Hatiboglu G, Ellerbrock M, Debus J, Herfarth K. Hypofractionated radiotherapy of the prostate using carbon ions or protons - acute toxicities of the IPI-study. [German], [Abstract]. 20th Annual Congress of the German Society for Radiation Oncology. Dusseldorf, Germany; Jul 3-6, 2014. Strahlenther Onkol 2014; 190(Suppl 1):136.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mariados N, Sylvester J, Shah D, Karsh L, Hudes R, Beyer D, et al. Hydrogel Spacer Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pivotal Trial: Dosimetric and Clinical Effects of Perirectal Spacer Application in Men Undergoing Prostate Image Guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 92: 971-7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Villers A, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Boccon-Gibod L, Stamey TA. Invasion of Denonvilliers’ fascia in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 1993; 149:793-8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vora SA, Wong WW, Schild SE, Ezzell GA, Halyard MY. Analysis of biochemical control and prognostic factors in patients treated with either low-dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 68:1053-8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zietman AL, Bae K, Slater JD, Shipley WU, Efstathiou JA, Coen JJ, et al. Randomized trial comparing conventional-dose with high-dose conformal radiation therapy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long-term results from proton radiation oncology group/american college of radiology 95-09. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:1106-11.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pinkawa M, Holy R, Piroth MD, Fischedick K, Schaar S, Szekely-Orban D, et al. Consequential late effects after radiotherapy for prostate cancer - a prospective longitudinal quality of life study. Radiat Oncol 2010; 5: 27.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mok G, Benz E, Vallee JP, Miralbell R, Zilli T. Optimization of radiation therapy techniques for prostate cancer with prostate-rectum spacers: a systematic review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 90:278-88.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wolf F, Gaisberger C, Ziegler I, Krenn E, Scherer P, Hruby S, et al. Comparison of two different rectal spacers in prostate cancer external beam radiotherapy in terms of rectal sparing and volume consistency. Radiother Oncol 2015; 116:221-5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arcangeli S, Agolli L, Donato V. Retreatment for prostate cancer with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): Feasible or foolhardy? Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2015; 20:425-9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Viswanathan AN, Damato AL, Nguyen PL Novel use of a hydrogel spacer permits reirradiation in otherwise incurable recurrent gynecologic cancers. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: e446-7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kishi K, Iida T, Ojima T, Sonomura T, Shirai S, Nakai M, et al. Esophageal gel-shifting technique facilitating eradicative boost or reirradiation to upper mediastinal targets of recurrent nerve lymph node without damaging esophagus. J Radiat Res 2013; 54:748-54.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bachmann R, Heinzelmann F, Muller AC, Ladurner R, Schneider CC, Konigsrainer A, et al. Laparoscopic pelvic mesh placement with closure of pelvic floor entrance to prevent small intestine radiation trauma - A retrospective cohort analysis. Int J Surg 2015; 23: 62-7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article