Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Estimation of cell response in fractionation radiotherapy using different methods derived from linear quadratic model Cover

Estimation of cell response in fractionation radiotherapy using different methods derived from linear quadratic model

Radiology and Oncology
Volume 49 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
By: ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Nov 2015
References

References

  1. 1. Baskar R, Lee KA, Yeoh KW. Cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions.2012;193-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Begg CA, Stewart FA, Vens C. Strategies to improve radiotherapy with targeted drugs.2011;239-53.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Stavrev P, Hristov D. Prostate IMRT fractionation strategies: two-phase treatment versus simultaneous integrated boost.2003;115-26.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Chang SX, Cullip TJ, Deschesne KM. Intensity modulation delivery techniques: ‘step & shoot’ MLC auto-sequence versus the use of a modulator.2000;948-59.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Verhey LJ. Physical considerations in the use of intensity modulated radiotherapy to produce three-dimensional conformal dose distributions.2000;191-203.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Jeraj M, Robar V. Multileaf collimator in radiotherapy.2004;235-40.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Ling CC, Burman C, Chui CS, Kutcher GJ, Leibel SA, LoSasso T, et al. Conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer using inversely-planned intensity-modulated photon beams produced with dynamic multileaf collimation.1996;721-30.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Mu X, Löfroth P-O, Karlsson M, Zackrisson B. The effect of fraction time in intensity modulated radiotherapy: theoretical and experimental evaluation of an optimization problem.2003;181-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Keall PJ, Chang M, Benedict S, Thames H, Vedam SS, Lin P-S. Investigating the temporal effects of respiratory-gated and intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment delivery on in vitro survival: an experimental and theoretical study.2008;1547-52.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Fowler JF, Welsh JS, Howard SP. Loss of biological effect in prolonged fraction delivery.2004;242-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Zheng XK, Chen LH, Wang WJ, Ye F, Liu JB, Li QS, et al. Impact of prolonged fraction delivery times simulating IMRT on cultured nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell killing.2010,1541-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Paganetti H. Changes in tumor cell response due to prolonged dose delivery times in fractionated radiation therapy.2005;892-900.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Wang X, Xiong XP, Lu J, Zhu GP, He SQ, Hu CS, et al. The in vivo study on the radiobiologic effect of prolonged delivery time to tumor control in C57BL mice implanted with Lewis lung cancer.2011;4
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Wang JZ, Li XA, D’souza WD, Stewart RD. Impact of prolonged fraction delivery times on tumor control: a note of caution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).2003;543-52.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Shibamoto Y, Masato I, Sugie C, Ogino H, Hara M. Recovery from sublethal damage during intermittent exposures in cultured tumor cells: implications for dose modification in radiosurgery and IMRT.2004;1484-90.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Ling CC, Gerweck LE, Zaider M, Yorke E. Dose-rate effects in external beam radiotherapy redux.2010;261-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Thames HD. An ‘incomplete-repair’ model for survival after fractionated and continuous irradiations.1985;319-39.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Nilsson P, Thames HD, Joiner MC. A generalized formulation of the ‘incomplete repair’ model for cell survival and tissue response to fractionated low dose-rate irradiation.1990;127-42.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Rourke SFCO, Mcaneney H, Hillen T. Linear quadratic and tumor control probability modeling in external beam radiotherapy.2009;799-817.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Brenner DJ. The linear-quadratic model is an appropriate methodology for determining isoeffective doses at large doses per fraction.2008;234-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Jones L, Hoban P, Metcalfe H. The use of the linear quadratic model in radiotherapy: a review.2001;132-46.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Price P, McMillan TJ. Use of the tetrazolium assay in measuring the response of human tumor cells to ionizing radiation.1990;1392-6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Buch K, Peters T, Nawroth T, Sanger M, Schmidberger H, Langguth P. Determination of cell survival after irradiation via clonogenic assay versus multiple MTT assay – a comparative study.2012;1
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Sieuwerts AM, Klijn JGM, Peters HA, Foekens JA. The MTT Tetrazolium salt assay scrutinized: how to use this assay reliably to measure metabolic activity of cell cultures in vitro for the assessment of growth characteristics, IC50-values and cell survival.1995;813-23.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Nikzad S, Hashemi B, Hasan Z S, Mozdarani H. The cell survival of F10B16 melanoma and 4T1 breast adenocarcinoma irradiated to gamma radiation using the MTT assay based on two different calculation methods.2013;29-36.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Nikzad S, Hashemi B. MTT assay instead of the clonogenic assay in measuring the response of cells to ionizing radiation.2014;3-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Shanei A, Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi M. Evaluation of testicular dose and associated risk from common pelvis radiation therapy in Iran.2014;867-70.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Cherubini R, De Nadal V, Gerardi S, Guryev D. Status report of a systematic investigation on low dose ionizing radiation effects in mammalian cells.2008;57-67.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Smith LG, Miller RC, Richard SM, Brenner DJ, Hall EJ, Phil D. Investigation of hypersensitivity to fractionated low dose radiation exposure.1999;187-91.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Marples B, Joiner MC. The response of Chinese hamster V79 cells to low radiation doses: evidence of enhanced sensitivity of the whole cell population.1993;41-51.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Ling CC, Gerweck LE, Zaider M, Yorke E. Dose-rate effects in external beam radiotherapy redux.2010;261-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Ling CC, Spiro IJ, Mitchell J, Stickler R. The variation of OER with dose rate.1985;1367-73.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Michaels HB, Epp ER, Ling CC, Peterson EC. Oxygen sensitization of CHO cells at ultrahigh dose rates: prelude to oxygen diffusion studies.1978;510-21.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2015-0040 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 347 - 356
Submitted on: May 5, 2015
Accepted on: Aug 12, 2015
Published on: Nov 27, 2015
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
fractionation radiotherapy,
survival,
dose per fraction,
number of fractions,
linear quadratic model
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Radiology

© 2015 Safoora Nikzad, Bijan Hashemi, Golshan Mahmoudi, Milad Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 49 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
Previous article
Next article