Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Factors of Local E-Government Development in Poland: The Case of the Poznań Agglomeration

Quaestiones Geographicae
Volume 35 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
By:
Open Access
|Jun 2016

References

  1. Aichholzer G., 2005. Service take-up and impacts of e-government in Austria. In: Wimmer M.A., Traunmüller R., Grönlund Å., Andersen K.V. (eds), Electronic government. 4th International Conference, EGOV 2005, Proceedings, 3591/2005, Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 93-104.10.1007/11545156_9
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Amoretti F., 2007. Digital international governance. In: Anttiroiko A-V., Mälkiä M. (eds), Encyclopedia of digital government. Idea Group Reference, Hershey, London: 365-370.10.4018/978-1-59140-789-8.ch056
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Anttiroiko A.-V., 2005. Urban e-government in Finland. In: Drüke H. (ed.), Local electronic government. A comparative study. Routledge, London-New York: 19-58.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Anttiroiko A.-V., 2008. Introductory chapter. A brief introduction to the field of e-government. In: Anttiroiko A.-V. (ed.), Electronic government: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Information Science Reference, Hershey- New York: xli-lxxv.10.4018/978-1-59904-947-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Baldersheim H., Øgård M., 2008. Innovation in e-government: Analysis of municipal web pages in the Nordic countries. Information Polity 13(3-4): 125-137.10.3233/IP-2008-0133
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Bélanger F., Carter L., 2008. Trust and risk in e-government adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17(2): 165-176.10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Bertot J.C., Jaeger P.T., 2008. The e-government paradox: Better customer service doesn’t necessarily cost less. Government Information Quarterly 25(2): 149-154.10.1016/j.giq.2007.10.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Bonina C.M., Cordella A., 2008. The new public management, e-government and the notion of ‘public value’: Lessons from Mexico. AIS Special Interest Group on ICT and Global Development Workshop, Paris, December 13, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Carbo T., Williams J.G., 2004. Models and metrics for evaluating local electronic government systems and services. The Electronic Journal of e-Government 3(2): 95-104.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Carter L., Weerakkody V., 2008. E-government adoption: A cultural comparison. Information Systems Frontiers 10(4): 473-482.10.1007/s10796-008-9103-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Castells M., 2010. The rise of the network society. The information age: Economy, society and culture. Vol. 1, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Cellary W., 2002. organizacja administracji publicznej na potrzeby obywateli (organisation of public administration for the needs of citizens). In: Cellary W. (ed.), Polska w drodze do globalnego społeczeństwa informacyjnego. Raport o rozwoju społecznym. UNDP Program Narodów Zjednoczonych ds. Rozwoju, Warszawa: 94-97.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Centeno C., van Bavel R., Burgelman J.C., 2005. A prospective view of e-government in the European Union. The Electronic Journal of e-Government 3(2): 59-66.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Chojnicki Z., 1993. Postmodernistyczne zmiany globalnego porządku społeczno-gospodarczego (Postmodern changes in the global socio-economic order). In: Kukliński A. (ed.), Polonia, quo vadis? Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 12(45): 167-204.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Cohen G., Nijkamp P., 2004. City, ICT and policy. Investigaciones Regionales 4(1): 29-51.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Cordella A., 2007. e-government: Towards the e-bureaucratic form? Journal of Information Technology 22(3): 265-274.10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000105
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Corey K.e., Wilson M.I., 2009. e-business and e-commerce. In: Kitchin R., Thrift N. (eds), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography 3: 285-290.10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00148-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Cotterill S., 2009. Local e-government partnerships. In: Reddick C.G. (ed.), Handbook of research on strategies for local e-government adoption and implementation: Comparative studies. Information Science Reference, Hershey-New York: 105-121.10.4018/978-1-60566-282-4.ch006
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. van Deursen A., van Dijk J., 2009. Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Government Information Quarterly 26(2): 333-340.10.1016/j.giq.2008.11.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. van Dijk J., 2006. The network society. Social aspects of new media. SAGE, London.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. van Dijk J., Peters o., ebbers W., 2008. explaining the acceptance and use of government Internet services: A multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly 25(3): 379-399.10.1016/j.giq.2007.09.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Draper N., Smith H., 1981. Applied regression analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Drüke H., 2005a. Introduction. In: Drüke H. (ed.), Local electronic government. A comparative study. Routledge, London- New York: 1-18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Drüke H., 2005b. Concluding remarks on national specifics and transfer and adoption of good practice. In: Drüke H. (ed.), Local electronic government. A comparative study. Routledge, London-New York: 269-292.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. van Duivenboden H., Lips M., 2005. Responsive e-government services: Towards ‘new’ public management. In: Bakkers V., Homburg V. (eds), The Information Ecology of e-Government. E-Government as Institutional and Technological Innovation in Public Administration. IOS Press: 141-154.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Engel A., 2004. The economic evaluation of e-government: The right strategic decision? German Journal of Urban Studies (Deutsche Zeitschrift für Kommunalwissenschaften DfK), 2/2004, Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik, Berlin (http://www.difu.de).
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. European Governance and Cyberdemocracy, 2001. European Commision, Brussels.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Fairchild A., Vuyst de B., 2007. Governmental collaboration and infrastructural standards in Belgium. The Electronic Journal of e-Government 5(2): 145-152.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Ferro e., Sorrentino M., 2010. Can intermunicipal collaboration help the diffusion of e-government in peripheral areas? evidence from Italy. Government Information Quarterly 27(1): 17-25.10.1016/j.giq.2009.07.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Frissen P.H.A., 1998. Public administration in cyberspace. In: Snellen I.Th.M., van de Donk W.B.H.J. (eds), Public administration in an information age. A handbook. IOS Press, Amsterdam: 33-46.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs less, 1993, NPR 93-a Report of the National Performance Review (http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/stis1993/npr93a/npr93a.txt).
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Gallego-Álvarez I., Rodríguez-Domínguez L., García- Sánchez I.M., 2010. Are determining factors of municipal e-government common to a worldwide municipal view? An intra-country comparison. Government Information Quarterly 27(4): 423-430.10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.011
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Gil-Garcia J.R., Pardo T.A., 2005. E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly 22(2): 187-216.10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Grabow B., Drüke H., Siegfried C., 2004. Factors for success for local community e-government. German Journal of Urban Studies (Deutsche Zeitschrift für Kommunalwissenschaften DfK), 2/2004, Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik, Berlin (http://www.difu.de).
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Harvey D., 1990. The condition of postmodernity. An enquiry into the origins of cultural changes. Blackwell, Cambridge- Oxford.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Heeks R., 1998. Information systems for public sector management. Working Paper Series 5, Public Sector Management Information Systems, Institute for Development Policy and Management, Manchester.10.2139/ssrn.3540075
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Heeks R., 2006. Implementing and managing e-government. SAGE, London.10.4135/9781446220191
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Heeks R., Bailur S., 2007. Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly 24(2): 243-265.10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. van der Heijden J., 2007. How business changes government in the information age. In: Anttiroiko A.-V., Mälkiä M. (eds), Encyclopedia of Digital Government. Idea Group Reference, Hershey, London: 928-932.10.4018/978-1-59140-789-8.ch139
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Heller J., Farelnik e., 2013. Finanse i samodzielność ekonomiczna a ustrój samorządów terytorialnych w Polsce (Finances and economic independence versus the local government system in Poland). Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 2(52): 81-94.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Hill H., 2004. Transformation of the administration by e-government. German Journal of Urban Studies (Deutsche Zeitschrift für Kommunalwissenschaften DfK), 2, Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik, Berlin (http://www.difu.de).
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Horst M., Kuttschreuter M., Gutteling J.M., 2007. Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior 23(4): 1838-1852.10.1016/j.chb.2005.11.003
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Inkinen T., Jauhiainen J.S., 2007. Public authorities and the local information society. In: Anttiroiko A.-V., Mälkiä M. (eds), Encyclopedia of digital government. Idea Group Publishing, Information Science Publishing, Hershey, London: 1370-1376.10.4018/978-1-59140-789-8.ch209
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Ivankova N.V., Creswell J.W., Stick S.L., 2006. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods 18(1): 3-20.10.1177/1525822X05282260
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Jaeger P.T., Thompson K.M., 2003. e-government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and future directions. Government Information Quarterly 20(3): 389-394.10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Jain A., 2004. Using the lens of Max Weber’s theory of bureaucracy to examine e-government research. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (www.hicss.hawaii.edu/diglib.htm).10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265321
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Kaczmarek T., 2005. Struktury terytorialno-administracyjne i ich reformy w krajach europejskich (Territorial-administrative structures and their reform in European countries). Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Kamal M., Weerakkody V., Irani Z., 2011. Analyzing the role of stakeholders in the adoption of technology integration solutions in UK local government: An exploratory study. Government Information Quarterly 28(2): 200-210.10.1016/j.giq.2010.08.003
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Kuk G., 2002. The digital divide and the quality of electronic service delivery in local government in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly 20(4): 353-363.10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.004
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Lucke J., 2007. Portals for the public sector. In: Anttiroiko A.-V., Mälkiä M. (eds), Encyclopedia of Digital Government. Idea Group Reference, Hershey, London: 1328-1333.10.4018/978-1-59140-789-8.ch203
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Luk S.C.Y., 2009. The impact of leadership and stakeholders on the success/failure of e-government service: Using the case study of e-stamping service in Hong Kong. Government Information Quarterly 26(4): 594-604.10.1016/j.giq.2009.02.009
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Margetts H., 2009. Public management change and e-government: The emergence of digital-era governance. In: Chadwick A., Howard P.N. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics. Routledge, London: 114-127.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. van der Meer A., van Winden W., 2003. E-governance in cities: A comparison of urban information and communication technology policies. Regional Sudies 37(4): 407-419.10.1080/0034340032000074433
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Millard J., 2003. ePublic services in Europe: Past, present and future. Research findings and new challenges. Danish Technological Institute, Aarhus.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Misra D.C., 2001. Select aspects of conceptual foundations of e-government: Clearing the fog for a better vision. Foundations of E-government, GIFT Publishing: 21-33.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Moon M.J., 2002. The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review 62(4): 424-433.10.1111/0033-3352.00196
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Moon M.J., Norris D.F., 2005. Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal 15(1): 43-60.10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00185.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Musso J., Weare C., Hale M., 2000. Designing Web technologies for local governance reform: Good management of good democracy? Political Communication 17: 1-17.10.1080/105846000198486
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Paskaleva-Shapira K., 2009. Assessing local readiness for city e-governance in Europe. In: Reddick C.G. (ed.), Handbook of research on strategies for local e-government adoption and implementation: Comparative studies. Information Science Reference, Hershey-New York: 62-82.10.4018/978-1-60566-282-4.ch004
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Perdał R., 2014. Czynniki rozwoju elektronicznej administracji w samorządzie lokalnym w Polsce (Factors of e-government development in the local government in Poland). Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Persson A., Goldkuhl G., 2010. Government value paradigms - bureaucracy, new public management, and e-government. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 27(4): 45-62.10.17705/1CAIS.02704
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. Rodríguez-Domínguez L., García-Sánchez I.M., Gallego-Álvarez I., 2011. Determining factors of e-government development: A worldwide national approach. International Public Management Journal 14(2): 218-248.10.1080/10967494.2011.597152
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. van Ryzin G.G. 2004. Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23(3): 433-448.10.1002/pam.20020
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. Sallmann R., 2005. ogólnokrajowy rozwój e-government. Austriackie formy rozwiązań (National development of e-government. Austrian solutions). In: Proniewicz J., Szczepańska K. (eds), Efektywna polityka i administracja. Strategie i instrumenty zarządzania miastami. Związek Miast Polskich, Österreichicher Städtebund, KDZ - Zentrum für Verwaltungsforschung, Poznań: 151-177.
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. Schedler K., Summermatter L., 2007. Customer orientation in electronic government: Motives and effects. Government Information Quarterly 24(2): 291-311.10.1016/j.giq.2006.05.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. Sirkemaa S., 2007. The role of partnerships in development of e-services - highlighting public sector organizations. International Journal of Public Information Systems 3(3): 201-212.
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. Stiglitz J.E., 2002. Globalization and its discontents. W.W. Norton & Company, New York.
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. Stryjakiewicz T., 2000. Implications of globalisation for regions and localities in an economic transition: The case of Poland. In: Parysek J.J., Stryjakiewicz T. (eds), Polish economy in transition. Spatial perspectives. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań: 7-28.
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. Swianiewicz P., 2001. Życzliwa obojętność. Władze lokalne i reforma samorządowa w oczach opinii publicznej w krajach Europy Środkowej (Friendly indifference. Local authorities and the local-government reform in the public opinion of Central European countries). EUROREG, Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative of the open Society Institute, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. The Role of eGovernment for Europe’s Future, 2003. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 26 Sept. 2003, CoM 2003 (567) final, Brussels.
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. Weber M., 1976. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen.
    Search in Google Scholar
  72. Weerakkody V., el-Haddadeh R., Sabol T., Ghoneim A., Dzupka P., 2012. E-government implementation strategies in developed and transition economies: A comparative study. International Journal of Information Management 32(1): 66-74.10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.10.005
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 115 - 129
Submitted on: Jan 22, 2016
Published on: Jun 15, 2016
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
local e-government,
development factors,
public e-services,
Poznań agglomeration,
Poland
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geography

© 2016 Robert Perdał, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 35 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)Next article