References
- Bach, M. (2007). The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test-Variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis. Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exper. Ophthalmol., 245 (7), 965-971.
- Brown, B., Lovie-Kitchin, J. E. (1989). High and low contrast acuity and clinical contrast sensitivity tested in a normal population. Optom. Vis. Sci., 66 (7), 467-473.
- Carney, L. G., Lembach, R. G. (1991). Management of keratoconus: Comparative visual assessments. CLAO J., 17 (1), 52-58.
- de Freitas Santos Paranhos, J., Avila, M. P., Paranhos, A. Jr., Schor, P. (2010). Evaluation of the impact of intracorneal ring segments implantations on the quality of life of patients with keratoconus using the NEI-RQL (National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of life) instrument. Brit. J. Ophthalmol., 94 (1), 101-105.
- de Freitas Santos Paranhos, J., Paranhos, Jr. A., Avila, M. P., Schor, P. (2011). Analysis of the correlation between ophthalmic examination and quality of life outcomes following intracorneal ring segment implantation for keratoconus. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, 74 (6), 410-413.
- Hess, R. F., Carney, L. G. (1979). Vision through an abnormal cornea: A pilot study of the relationship between visual loss from corneal distortion, corneal edema, keratoconus, and some allied corneal pathology. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 18 (5), 476-83.
- Jinabhai, A., O’Donnell, C., Radhakrishnan, H., Nourrit, V. (2012). Forward light scatter and contrast sensitivity in keratoconus patients. Contact Lens Anterior Eye, 35 (1), 22-27.
- Kennedy, R. S., Dunlap, W. P. (1990). Assessment of the Vistech contrast sensitivity test for repeated-measures applications. Optom. Vis. Sci., 67 (4), 248-251.
- Kymes, S. M., Walline, J. J., Zadnik, K., Gordon, M. O., the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study Group. (2004). Quality of life in keratoconus. Amer. J. Ophthalmol., 138 (4), 527-535.
- Kymes, S. M., Walline, J. J., Zadnik, K., Sterling, J., Gordon, M. O., on behalf of the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study Group. (2008). Changes in the quality of life of people with keratoconus. Amer. J. Ophthalmol., 145 (4), 611-617.
- Marsack, J. D., Parker, K. E., Pesudovs, K., Donnelly, W. J. 3rd., Applegate, R. A. (2007). Uncorrected wavefront error and visual performance during RGP wear in keratoconus. Optom. Vis. Sci., 84 (6), 463-469.
- Owsley, C. (2003). Contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmol. Clin. North Amer., 16 (2), 171-177.
- Rabinowitz, Y. S. (1998). Keratoconus. Survey Ophthalmol., 42 (4), 297-319.
- Stein, R., Stein, R. (2011). Corneal collagen crosslinking: A major breakthrough in the management of keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, and ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmol. Rounds, 9 (1), 1-5.
- Jadidi, K., Mosavi, S. A., Nejat, F., Naderi, M., Janani, L., Serahati, S. (2015). Intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation (Keraring 355°) in patients with central keratoconus: 6-month follow-up. J. Ophthalmol., doi: 10.1155/2015/916385.
- Zadnik, K., Mannis, M. J., Johnson, C. A. (1984). An analysis of contrast sensitivity in identical twins with keratoconus. Cornea, 3 (2), 99-103.10.1097/00003226-198402000-00004
- Zadnik, K., Mannis, M. J., Johnson, C. A., Rich, D. (1987). Rapid contrast sensitivity assessment in keratoconus. Amer. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt., 64 (9), 693-697.