Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Understory Changes in Fraxinus excelsior Stands in Response to Dieback in Latvia Cover
Open Access
|Aug 2016

References

  1. Anonymous (2005).. FRAXIGEN project. UK: Oxford Forestry Institute, University of Oxford. 128 pp.
  2. Anonymous (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at:(accessed 11.02.2016).
  3. Bakys, R. (2013).. Doctoral Thesis No. 10. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. 48 pp.
  4. Beckage, B., Clark, J. S., Clinton, B. D., Haines, B. L. (2000). A long-term study of tree seedling recruitment in southern Appalachian forests: The effects of canopy gaps and shrub understories.,, 1617–1631.
  5. Brewer, R. (1980). A half-century of changes in the herb layer of a climax deciduous forest in Michigan.,, 823–832.
  6. Bušs, K. (1976).[Basis of Forest Classification in the Latvian SSR]. Latvijas zinātniski pētnieciskais mežsaimniecības problēmu institūts, Rīga. 34 pp. (in Latvian).
  7. Coomes, D. A., Allen, R. B., Forsyth, D. M., Lee, W. G. (2003). Factors preventing the recovery of New Zealand forests following control of invasive deer.,, 450–459.
  8. de la Cretaz, A. L., Kelty, M. J. (2002). Development of tree regeneration in fern-dominated forest understories after reduction of deer browsing.,, 416–426.
  9. Dobrowolska, D., Hein, S., Oosterbaan, A., Wagner, S., Skovsgaard, J. P. (2011). A review of European ash (L.): Implications for silviculture.,(2), 133–148.
  10. Dunn, C. P. (1986). Shrub layer response to death ofin southeastern Wisconsin lowland forests.,(2), 142–148.
  11. Ehrenfeld, J. G. (1980). Understory response to canopy gaps of varying size in a mature oak forest.,(1), 29–41.
  12. Gillman, L. N., Wright, S. D., Ogden, J. (2003). Response of forest tree seedlings to simulated litterfall damage., 53–60.
  13. Givnish, T. J. (2002). On the adaptive significance of evergreen vs. deciduous leaves: Solving the triple paradox.,, 703–743.
  14. Gonzalez, M. E., Veblen, T. T., Donoso, C., Valeria, L. (2002). Tree regeneration responses in a lowland-dominated forest after bamboo dieback in south-central Chile.,, 59–73.
  15. Henry, J. D., Swan, J. M. A. (1974). Reconstructing forest history from live and dead plant material — an approach to the study of forest succession in southwest New Hampshire.,, 772–778.
  16. Huenneke, L.F. (1983). Understory response to gaps caused by the death ofin central New York.,(2), 170–175.
  17. Kirisits, T., Freinschlag, C. (2011). Ash dieback caused byin a seed plantation ofin Austria.,(9), 184–191.
  18. Klinka, K., Chen H. Y. H., Wang, Q., de Montigny, L. (1996). Forestc and their influence on understory vegetation in early-serial stands on West Vancouver Island.,(3), 193–199.
  19. Laiviņš, M., Mangale, D. (2004). The distribution of young growth of the common ash () in Latvia [Parastā oša () paaugas izplatība Latvijā].(46), 61–69 (in Latvian).
  20. Latham, R. E. (2003). Shrubland longevity and rare plant species in the northeastern United States.,, 21–39.
  21. Lygis, V., Bakys, R., Gustiene, A., Burokiene, D., Matelis, A., Vasaitis, R. (2014). Forest self-regeneration fallowing clear-felling of dieback-affected: Focus on ash.,, 501–510.
  22. Mackey, H. E., Sivec, N. (1973). The present composition of a formwork-chestnut forest in the Allegheny Mountains of western Pennsylvania.,, 915–919.
  23. Mallik, A. U. (2003). Conifer regeneration problems in boreal and temperate forests with ericaceous understory: Role of disturbance, seedbed limitation, and keystone species change.,(3&4), 341–366.
  24. McCormick, J. F., Platt, R. B. (1980). Recovery of an Appalachian forest following the chestnut blight, or, Catherine Keever-You were right!,, 264–273.
  25. Pallardy, S. G. (2008).. Elsevier, London. 464 pp.
  26. Pliura, A., Lygis, V., Suchockas, V., Marčiulyniene, D., Suchockas, V., Bakys, R. (2015). Genetic variation of Fraxinus excelsior half-sib families in response to ash dieback disease following simulated spring frost and summer drought treatments.,, 12–22.
  27. Royo, A. A., Carson, W. P. (2006). On the formation of dense understory layers in forests worldwide: Consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession.,, 1345–1362.
  28. Runkle, J. R. (1990). Gap dynamics in an Ohioforest and speculations on the geography of disturbance.,, 632–641.
  29. Schnitzer, S. A., Dalling, J. W., Carson, W. P. (2000). The impact of lianas on tree regeneration in tropical forest canopy gaps: Evidence for an alternative pathway of gap-phase regeneration.,, 655–666.
  30. Sheil, D. (2001). Long-term observations of rain forest succession, tree diversity and responses to disturbance.,(2), 183–199.
  31. Sulser, J. A. S. (1971). The vegetation of the William L. Hutcheson Memorial Forest: A quantitative comparison of twenty years.,, 15–24.
  32. Vasiliauskas, R., Bakys, R., Lygis, V., Barklund, P., Ihrmark, K., Stenlid, J. (2006). Fungi associated with the decline ofin the Baltic States and Sweden. In: Oszako, T., Woodward, S. (eds.).. Forest Research Institute, Warsaw, pp. 45–53.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/prolas-2016-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2255-890X (formerly 1407-009X) | Journal ISSN: 1407-009X
Language: English
Page range: 131 - 137
Submitted on: Feb 24, 2016
Published on: Aug 2, 2016
Published by: Latvian Academy of Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Ilze Pušpure, Māris Laiviņš, Roberts Matisons, Tālis Gaitnieks, published by Latvian Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.