Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Spread of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in Latvia: Analysis based on Dynamics of Young Ash Stands Cover

Spread of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in Latvia: Analysis based on Dynamics of Young Ash Stands

Open Access
|Aug 2016

References

  1. Anonymous (1926).I. [Forest statistics in Latvia]. Meža departaments, Rīga. 210 pp. (in Latvian).
  2. Anonymous (1937).[15th anniversary of the state’s silviculture]. Meža departaments, Rīga. 131 pp. (in Latvian).
  3. Anonymous (2015). Valsts meža dienests 2000–2015. Meža statistika [State Forest Service. Forestry statistics]. Available at:.
  4. Bakys, R., Vasaitis, R., Skovsgaard, J. P. (2013). Pattern and severity dieback in young even-aged stands of European ash () in relation to stand density, bud flushing phenotype, and season.,(3), 120–126.
  5. Baral, H.-O., Queloz, V., Tsuyoshi, H. (2014)., the correct scientific name for the fungus causing ash dieback in Europe.,(1), 79–80.
  6. Diekman, M., Brunet, J., Rühling, Å, Falkengren-Grerup, U. (1999). Effects of nitrogen deposition: Results of a temporal-spatial analysis of deciduous forests in south Sweden.,, 471–481.
  7. Kuhn, N., Amiet, R., Hufschmid, N. (1987). Veränderungen in der Waldwegetation des Schweiz infolge Nährstoffanreicherung aus der Atmosphäre..,, 77–84.
  8. Eihe, V. (1940). Latvijas mežu ģeogrāfisks iedalījums [The geographical division of forests in Latvia]. In: Eihe, V. (Ed.).I/II [Forester’s job and science I/II]. Šalkone, Rīga, pp. 471–565 (in Latvian).
  9. Fangmeier, A., Hadwiger-Fangmeier, A., van der Erden, L., Jäger, H. J. (1994). Effects of atmospheric ammonia on vegetation: A review.,, 43–82.
  10. Grauziņš, K. (1969). Lielu parastā oša stādu un mežeņu izmēģinājuma stādījumu rezultāti Bauskas MRS 1964.–1966. g. [Results of experimental plantings of large common ash seedlings and wildings in Bauska MRS (1964–1964)]., No. 22, 276–291 (in Latvian).
  11. Grauziņš, K. (1971). Oša mākslīgas ieaudzēšanas novērtējums Bauskas un Jelgavas MRS mistrāja meža tipā [Assessment of common ash plantings in mixed forest stands in Bauska and Jelgava MRS].[Increase of forest productivity and rational use of wood in the Latvian SSR]., No. 36, 22–32 (in Latvian).
  12. Grauzinsh, K. J. (1971). Methods for breeding ash in heteroherbosa forest growth conditions in the Latvian SSR. Synopsis of Candidate of Sciences (Doctoral) Thesis (agricultural sciences). [Граузиньш, К. Я.. Автореферат диссертации на соискание ученой степени кандидата сельскохозяйственных наук]. Jelgava. 22 pp. (in Russian).
  13. Gross, A., Hodenrieder, O., Pautasso, M., Queloz, V., Sieber, T. N. (2014)., the causal agent of European ash dieback..,(1), 5–21.
  14. Juodvalkis, A., Vasilauskas, R. (2002). The extent and possible causes of dieback of ash stands in Lithuania.,, 17–22 (in Lithuanian).
  15. Kalniņš, A. (1943).[Hunting]. Latvju Grāmata, Rīga. 704 pp.
  16. Kenigsvalde, K., Arhipova, N., Laiviņš, M., Gaitnieks, T. (2010). Oša audžu bojāeju izraisoša sēneLatvijā [Fungusas a causal agent for ash decline in Latvia].,, 110–120 (in Latvian).
  17. Kowalski, T. (2001). Dieback of ash., 4/359, 6–7 (in Polish).
  18. Kowalski, T. (2006).sp. nov. associated with dieback of ash () in Poland.,, 464–270.
  19. Kowalski, T., Lukomska, A. (2005). Studies ofL. dieback in Wloszczowa Forest Unit stands.,, 429–440 (in Polish).
  20. Kronītis, J. (1966).[Handbook of silviculture]. Liesma, Rīga. 342 pp. (in Latvian).
  21. Kuhn, N., Amiet, R., Hufschmid, N. (1987). Veränderungen in der Waldwegetation des Schweiz infolge Nährstoffanreicherung aus der Atmosphäre..,, 77–84.
  22. Kundziņš, A. (1937). Oša izplatība un atjaunošanās apstākļi Latvijā [Distribution and conditions for regeneration of ash in Latvia].,(140), 5188.
  23. Laiviņš, M. (1997). Environmental changes related dynamics of the number of sites of rare indigenous and exotic plant species in Latvia.,(2), 9–18.
  24. Laiviņš, M. (1998). Latvijas boreālo priežu mežu sinantropizācija un eitrofikācija [Synantrophization and eutrophication of the boreal pine forests in Latvia]., No. 1, 1–137.
  25. Laiviņš, M., Gavrilova, G. (2003). Neofītās Sosnovska latvāņasabiedrības Latvijā [in Latvia: sociology, ecology and distribution]., No. 7, 45–65.
  26. Laiviņš, M., Mangale, D. (2004). Parastā ošapaaugas izplatība Latvijā [The distribution of young growth of the common ashin Latvia].,, 61–69 (in Latvian).
  27. Laiviņš, M., Priede, A., Krampis, I. (2006). Distribution ofin Latvia.,(2), 69–77.
  28. Laiviņš, M., Čekstere, G. (2014). Nemeža biotopu pārkrūmošanās Rīgā. I.izplatība, ekoloģija un augu sabiedrības [Shrub encroachment in non-wooded habitats in Riga. I. Distribution patterns, ecology and plant communities of].,(61), 39–65 (in Latvian).
  29. Luchi, C. M., Montecchio, L., Santini, A. (2012). Situation with ash in Italy: Stand characteristic, health condition, ongoing work and research needs. In: Meinprize, H., Hendry, S., Weir, J. (eds.).,Forest Commision, pp. 25–26.
  30. Ozolinčius, R., Miksys, V., Stakenas, V. (2005). Growth-independent mortality of Lithuanian forest tree species.,(Suppl. 6), 153–160.
  31. Pautasso, M., Aas, G., Queloz, V., Heldenrieder, O. (2013). European ash () dieback: A conservation biology challenge.,, 37–49.
  32. Przybyl, K. (2002). Fungi associated with necrotic apical parts ofshoots..,, 387–394.
  33. Ramans, K. 1994. Ainavrajonēšana. In:[]. Latvijas Enciklopēdija, Rīga, pp. 22–24 (in Latvian).
  34. Ramans, K., Zelčs, V. (1995). Fizioģeogrāfiskā rajonēšana [Physiogeographical zoning]. In:2. sēj. []. Latvijas Enciklopēdija, Rīga, pp. 74–76 (in Latvian).
  35. Rytkönen, A., Lilja, A., Drenkhan, R., Gaitnieks, T., Hantula, J. (2011). First record ofin Finland and genetic variation among samples from Aland, mainland Finland, Estonia and Latvia.,, 169–174.
  36. Saks, K. A. (1957). Ash growing in the Baltic forests [Сакс, К. А. Ясеневое хозяйство в лесах Прибалтики]., No. 6, 455–464 (in Russian).
  37. Sakss, K. (1958).[Ash forest stands and their regeneration in the Latvian SSR]. LVI, Rīga. 131 pp. (in Latvian).
  38. Sleinis, J. (1937). Latvijas ģeogrāfiskie reģioni [Geographical regions of Latvia]. In: Malta, N., Galenieks, P. (eds.). Valtera un Rapas akciju sabiedrības apgāds, Rīga, pp. 115–204 (in Latvian).
  39. Solheim, H., Tollefsrud, M. M., Hietala, A. M., Nagy, Z. A., Timmermann, V., Beja, I., Myking, T., Sonstebo, J. H., Smith, A. V. (2012). Situation with ash and ash dieback in Norwey — current situation and ongoing research. In: Meinprize, H., Hendry, S., Weir, J. (eds.).,Forest Commision, pp. 31–32.
  40. Stakėnas, V., Beniušis, R., Varnagyritė-Kabašinskienė, L., Araminienė, V., Žemaitis, P., Čapkauskas, G. (2013). Changes of tree condition in Lithuania, 1989–2012.,(73), 7–18. (in Lithuanian).
  41. Strautzels, T. (1939). Gājputnu ierašanās Latvijā [Arrival of migratory birds in Latvia]., 2/3, 286–317 (in Latvian).
  42. Vanags, J. (Comp.) (1995).[30 years of silviculture and forest production in Latvia]. Mežizstrādes ražošanas sabiedrība „Latvijas mežs”, Rīga. 168 pp. (in Latvian).
  43. Vasaitis, R. (2012). Current research on dieback ofin Northern Europe.,, 66–68.
  44. Von Sievers, M. (1903).. Verlag und Druck von W. F. Häcker, Riga. 48 S. (in German).
  45. Zelčs, V., Šteins, V. (1989). Latvijas daba un fizioģeogrāfiskie rajoni [Nature and physiogeographical regions in Latvia]., No. 7, 22–24.
  46. Zirnītis, A. (1956). Daži pētījumi par Latvijas PSR bioklimatu [Some studies on the bioclimate in the Latvian SSR].,(4), 71–92.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/prolas-2016-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2255-890X (formerly 1407-009X) | Journal ISSN: 1407-009X
Language: English
Page range: 124 - 130
Submitted on: Mar 8, 2016
Published on: Aug 2, 2016
Published by: Latvian Academy of Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Māris Laiviņš, Agnese Priede, Ilze Pušpure, published by Latvian Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.