Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Growth Patterns and Spatial Distribution of Common Ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) in Latvia Cover

Growth Patterns and Spatial Distribution of Common Ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) in Latvia

Open Access
|Aug 2016

References

  1. Anonymous (2005). FRAXIGEN.Oxford Forestry Institute, University of Oxford, UK, 128 pp..
  2. Anonymous (2015). Meža statistikas CD [Forest statistics]. Available at:(accessed 10 July 2015).
  3. Cleary, M. R., Arhipova, N., Gaitnieks, T., Stenlid, J., Vasaitis, R. (2013). Natural infection ofseeds by.,, 83–85.
  4. Dobrowolska, D., Hein, S., Oosterbaan, A., Wagner, S., Clark, J., Skovsgaard, J. P. (2011). A review of European ash (L.): Implications for silviculture.,,133–148.
  5. Dufour, S., Piégay, H. (2008). Geomorphological controls ofgrowth and regeneration in floodplain forests.,, 205–215.
  6. Gross, A., Holdenrieder, O., Pautasso, M., Queloz, V., Sieber, T. N. (2014)., the causal agent of European ash dieback.,, 5–21.
  7. Hannouz, S., Collet, R., Butaud, J. C., Bleron, L., Candelier, K. (2015). Mechanical characterization of heat-treated ash wood in relation with structural timber standards.,, 13.
  8. Juodvalkis, A., Kairiukstis, L., Vasiliauskas, R. (2005). Effects of thinning on growth of six tree species in north-temperate forests of Lithuania.,, 187–192.
  9. Kadunc, A. (2004). Growth characteristics of common ash (L.) in Slovenia.,, 63–88.
  10. Kenigsvalde, K., Arhipova, N., Laiviņš, M., Gaitnieks, T. (2010). Fungusas a causal agent for ash decline in Latvia.,, 110–120.
  11. Kerr, G. (1995). Silviculture of ash in southern England.,, 63–70.
  12. Kerr, G., Cahalan, C. (2004). A review of site factors affecting the early growth of ashL.).,, 225–234.
  13. Knaggs, G., Xenopoulou, S. (2004).COFORD, Dublin. 4 pp.
  14. Lekwadi, S. O., Nemesova, A., Lynch, T., Phillips, H., Hunter, A., Mac Siśrtįin, M. (2012). Site classification and growth models for Sitka spruce plantations in Ireland.,, 56–65.
  15. Liepins, K., Lazdins, A., Lazdina, D., Daugaviete, M., Miezite, O. (2008). Naturally afforested agricultural lands in Latvia — assessment of available timber resources and potential productivity. In:,, pp. 194–201.
  16. Marigo, G., Peltier, J.-P., Girel, J., Pautou, G. (2000). Success in the demographic expansion ofL.,, 1–13.
  17. McKinney, L. V., Nielsen, L. R., Collinge, D. B., Thomsen, I. M., Hansen, J. K. Kjær, E. D. (2014). The ash dieback crisis: Genetic variation in resistance can prove a long-term solution.,, 485–499.
  18. Mitchell, R. J., Beaton, J. K., Bellamy, P. E., Broome, A., Chetcuti, J., Eaton, S., Ellis, C. J., Gimona, A., Harmer, R., Hester, A. J., Hewison, R. L., Hodgetts, N. G., Iason, G. R., Kerr, G., Littlewood, N. A., Newey, S., Potts, J. M., Pozsgai, G., Ray, D., Sim, D. A., Stockan, J. A., Taylor, A. F. S., Woodward, S. (2014). Ash dieback in the UK: A review of the ecological and conservation implications and potential management options.,, 95–109.
  19. Pautasso, M., Aas, G., Queloz, V., Holdenrieder, O. (2013). European ash () dieback — a conservation biology challenge.,, 37–49.
  20. Pliūra, A., Heuertz, M. (2003). EUFORGEN.(). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome. 6 pp.
  21. Rajora, O. P., Mosseler, A. (2001). Challenges and opportunities for conservation of forest genetic resources.,, 197–212.
  22. Ramans, K., Zelčs, V. (1995). Fizioģeogrāfiskā rajonēšana [Physiogeographic districts]. Kavacs, G. (ed.). In:[The Encyclopedia of Latvia’s Nature]. Latvijas Enciklopēdija, Rīga, 74–76 pp. (in Latvian).
  23. Sacenieks, R., Matuzānis, J. (1964).[Tables for Forestry]. Latvijas Valsts izdevniecība, Rīga. 207 lpp. (in Latvian).
  24. Sakss, K. (1950). Oša dabiskā atjaunošanās jauktās audzēs Latvijas PSR [Natural regeneration of common ash in mixed stands in the Latvian SSR].,, 5–34 (in Latvian).
  25. Sakss, K. (1958).[Common Ash Stands and Its Regeneration Basics]. Latvijas Valsts izdevniecība, Rīga. 131 pp. (in Latvian).
  26. Sakss, K. (1952). Oša mežeņu un celmiņu stādījumu izmēģinājumi [Planting common ash with wildings and small stumps].,, 3–29 (in Latvian).
  27. Střeštík, S., Šamonil, P. (2006). Ecological valence of expanding European ash (L.) in the Bohemian Karst (Czech Republic).,, 293–305.
  28. Wardle, P. (1961).L.,, 739–751.
  29. Weber-Blaschke, G., Heitz, R., Blaschke, M. and Ammer, C. (2008). Growth and nutrition of young European ash (L.) and sycamore maple (L.) on sites with different nutrient and water statuses.,, 465–479.
  30. Zālītis, P., Jansons, J. (2013).[Latvian Forest Typology and Its Origin]. DU Akadēmiskais apgāds “Saule”, Daugavpils. 167 pp. (in Latvian).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/prolas-2016-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2255-890X (formerly 1407-009X) | Journal ISSN: 1407-009X
Language: English
Page range: 109 - 115
Submitted on: Feb 17, 2016
Published on: Aug 2, 2016
Published by: Latvian Academy of Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Kaspars Liepiņš, Jānis Liepiņš, Roberts Matisons, published by Latvian Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.