Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Susceptibility of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris Seedlings of Various origins to Heterobasidion annosum and H. parviporum Cover

Susceptibility of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris Seedlings of Various origins to Heterobasidion annosum and H. parviporum

Open Access
|Apr 2016

References

  1. Anonymous (2014). R Core Team: A language and environment for statistical computing [computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  2. Arhipova, N., Gaitnieks, T., Donis, J., Stenlid, J., Vasaitis, R. (2011). Butt rot incidence, causal fungi and related yield loss instands of Latvia..,(12), 2337–2345.
  3. Baumanis, I., Gailis, A., Liepiņš, K. (2001). Latvijas priežu provenienču salīdzinājums. [Comparison of Scots pine provenances in Latvia].,, 52–66 (in Latvian).
  4. Garbelotto, M., Gonthier, P. (2013). Biology, epidemiology and control ofspecies worldwide..,, 39–59.
  5. Gonthier, P., Thor, M. (2013). Annosus root and butt rots. In: Gonthier, P., Nicolotti, G. (Eds.).CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp. 128–158.
  6. Karlsson, B., Tsopelas, P., Zamponi, L., Capretti, P., Soulioti, N. (2008). Susceptibility toinclones grown in different environments..,(2), 73–145.
  7. Korhonen, K. (1978). Intersterility groups of..,(6), 1–25.
  8. Korhonen, K., Stenlid, J. (1998). Biology of. In: Woodward, S., Stenlid, J., Karjalainen, R., Hüttermann, A. (Eds.).:CABI, Wallingford, pp. 43–70.
  9. Kuhlman, E. G. (1970). Seedling inoculations withshow variation in virulence adn in host susceptibility.,, 1743–1746.
  10. Łakomy, P., Kwaśna, H., Dalke-Świderska, M. (2011). The virulence ofpopulation from Norway spruce stand in Suvałki forest district.(3), 27–36.
  11. Lindberg, M. (1992). S and P intersterility groups in; Infection frequencies through bark ofandseedlings andgrowth rates at different oxygen levels..,(1), 41–45.
  12. Lindberg, M., Johansson, M. (1992). Resistance ofseedlings to infection byin relation to drough stress..,(2), 115–124.
  13. McLaughlin, J. A., Šica, L. (1993). Growing pine in Latvia: Pathological considerations., Nr. 7, 49–56.
  14. Redfern, D. B., Stenlid, J. (1998). Spore dispersal and infection. In: Woodward, S., Stenlid, J., Karjalainen, R., Hüttermann, A. (Eds.).:CABI, Wallingford, pp. 105–124.
  15. Skrøppa, T., Solheim, H., Steffenrem, A. (2015). Genetic variation, inheritance patterns and parent–offspring relationships after artificial inoculations withandin Norway spruce seed orchards and progeny tests..,(1), 1–12.
  16. Santini, A., Casini, N., Di Lonardo, V., Raddi, P. (1997). Canker resistance stability of someclones to[Tuscany]..,, 269–277.
  17. Stenlid, J. (1985). Population structure ofas determined by somatic incompatibility, sexual incompatibility, and isoenzyme patterns..,(12), 2268–2273.
  18. Stenlid, J., Swedjemark, G. (1988). Differential growth of S- and P-isolates ofinand..,(2), 209–213.
  19. Stenlid, J., Wästerlund, I. (1986). Estimating the frequency of stem rot inusing an increment borer.., 1 (1–4), 303–308.
  20. Swedjemark, G., Johannesson, H., Stenlid, J. (1999). Intraspecific variation infor growth in sapwood ofand..,(4), 249–258.
  21. Swedjemark, G., Stenlid, J. (1995). Susceptibility of conifer and broadleaf seedlings to Swedish S- and P-strains ofunder greenhouse conditions..,(1), 73–79.
  22. Swedjemark, G., Stenlid, J. (1997). Between-tree and between-isolate variation for growth of S-groupin sapwood ofcuttings..,(5), 711–715.
  23. Swedjemark, G., Karlsson, B., 2004. Variation in incidence and genetic impact on natural infection ofin(L.) Karst. in genetic trials in south Sweden..,(1–3), 135–145.
  24. Swedjemark, G., Stenlid, J., Karlsson, B. (1997). Genetic variation among clones ofin resistance to growth of. Silvae Genet.,(6), 369–374.
  25. Swedjemark, G., Stenlid, J., Karlsson, B. (2001). Variation in growth ofamong clones ofincubated for different periods of time..,(3), 163–175.
  26. Swedjemark, G., Karlsson, B., Stenlid, J. (2007). Exclusion offrom inoculated clones ofand evidence of systemic induced resistance..,, 110–117.
  27. Vasiliauskas, R., Stenlid, J., (1998). Spread of S and P group isolates ofwithin and amongtrees in central Lithuania..,(7), 961–966.
  28. Werner, A., Łakomy, P. (2002). Host specialization of IS–group isolates ofto Scots pine, Norway spruce and common fir in field inoculation experiments.,, 59–68.
  29. Worrall, J. J., Parmeter, J. R. Jr., Cobb, F. W. Jr. (1983). Host specialization of.,(2), 304–307.
  30. Zaļuma, A., Jansons, Ā., Burņeviča, B., Baumanis, I., un Gaitnieks, T. (2015).s.l. sastopamībavar.stādījumos Latvijā. [Occurrence ofs.l. in stands ofvar.in Latvia]., 56–67 (in Latvian).
  31. Zaļuma, A., Gaitnieks, T., Arhipova, N., Vasaitis, R. (2015). Growth rates ofs.s. andin functional sapwood ofand,(5), 437–439.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/prolas-2016-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2255-890X (formerly 1407-009X) | Journal ISSN: 1407-009X
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 33
Submitted on: Jul 9, 2015
Published on: Apr 4, 2016
Published by: Latvian Academy of Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Astra Zaļuma, Arnis Gailis, Natālija Burņeviča, Kari Korhonen, Tālis Gaitnieks, published by Latvian Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.