Have a personal or library account? Click to login
New technique of compression anastomosis in colorectal surgery – first results in 25 patients in Macedonia Cover

New technique of compression anastomosis in colorectal surgery – first results in 25 patients in Macedonia

PRILOZI
Volume 37 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)
By: Svetozar Antovic,  Aleksandar Mitevski,  Aleksandar Karagozov,  Biljana Kuzmanovska and  Nikola Jankulovski  
Open Access
|Jul 2016

References

  1. 1. Choi DH, Hwang JK, Ko YT, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010; 26: 265–73.10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.265
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Fleshman JW, Nelson H, Peters WR, Kim HC, Larach S, Boorse RR, et al. Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39: S53-S58.10.1007/BF02053806
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Lustosa SA, Matos D, Atallah AN, et al. Stapled versus hand sewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001; 3: CD 003144.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. McCue JL, Phillips RK. Sutureless intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg. 1991; 78: 1291–1296.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Hardy KJ. Non-suture anastomosis: the historical development. Aust N Z J Surg. 1990; 60: 625–633.10.1111/j.1445-2197.1990.tb07444.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Kaidar-Person O, Rosenthal RJ, Wexner SD, et al. Compression anastomosis: history and clinical considerations. Am J Sur. 2008; 195: 818–826.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.10.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Murphy JB. Classical articles in colonic and rectal surgery. Cholecysto-intestinal, entero-intestinal anastomosis, and approximation without sutures. Dis Colon Rectum. 1981; 24: 51–59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Kanshin NN, Lytkin MI, Knysh VI, et al. [First experience with application of compression anastomoses with the apparatus AKA-2 in operations on the large intestine]. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 1984; 132: 52–57.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Hardy TG, Jr., Pace WG, Maney JW, et al. A bio-fragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis. An experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985; 28: 484–490.10.1007/BF02554090
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Bubrick MP, Corman ML, Cahill CJ, et al. Prospective, randomized trial of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring. The BAR Investigational Group. Am J Surg. 1991; 161: 136–142.10.1016/0002-9610(91)90374-M
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Szold A. New concepts for a compression anastomosis: superelastic clips and rings. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2008; 17: 168–171.10.1080/1364570080210312618609001
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Barras CD, Myers KA. Nitinol – its use in vascular surgery and other applications. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 19: 564-569.10.1053/ejvs.2000.111110873721
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Stewart D, Hunt S, Pierce R, et al. Validation of the NITI Endoluminal Compression Anastomosis Ring (Endo CAR) device and comparison to the traditional circular stapled colorectal anastomosis in a porcine model. Surg Innov. 2007; 14: 252.10.1177/155335060731224118178912
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. D’Hoore A, Hompes D, Folkesson J, et al. Circular ‘superelastic’ compression anastomosis: from the animal lab to clinical practice. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008; 17: 172–5.10.1080/1364570080210314218608997
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46: 653–60.10.1007/s10350-004-6627-912792443
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Neutzling CB, Lustosa SA, Proenca IM, et al. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 15: CD003144.10.1002/14651858.CD003144.pub222336786
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Hyman N, Manchester TL, Osler T, et al. Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis. It’s later than you think. Ann Surg. 2007; 245: 254–8.10.1097/01.sla.0000225083.27182.85187698717245179
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Kopelman D, Lelcuk S, Sayfan J, Matter I, Willenz EP, Zaidenstein L, et al. End-to-end compression anastomosis of the rectum: a pig model. World J Surg. 2007; 31: 532–537.10.1007/s00268-006-0221-317334866
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Starcher B, Fleshman J. Validation of the NITI Endoluminal Compression Anastomosis Ring (EndoCAR) device and comparison to the traditional circular stapled colorectal anastomosis in a porcine model. Surg Innov. 2007; 14: 252–260.10.1177/155335060731224118178912
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. D'Hoore A, Hompes D, Folkesson J, Penninckx F, Pahlman L. Circular ‘superelastic’ compression anastomosis: from the animal lab to clinical practice. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008; 17: 172–175.10.1080/1364570080210314218608997
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. D'Hoore A, Hompes D, Folkesson J, Penninckx F, Pahlman L. Circular ‘superelastic’ compression anastomosis: from the animal lab to clinical practice. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008; 17: 172–175.10.1080/13645700802103142
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Masoomi H, Luo R, Mills S, Carmichael J, Senagore A, Stamos M. Compression anastomosis ring device in colorectal anastomosis: a review of 1,180 patients. The American Journal of Surgery. 2013; 205: 447–45110.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.03.01323290352
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Song C, Frank T, Cuschieri A. Shape memory alloy clip for compression colonic anastomosis. J Biomech Eng. 2005; 127: 351–4.10.1115/1.187119515971714
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Thiede A, Geiger D, Dietz UA, et al. Overview on compression anastomoses: biofragmentable anastomosis ring multicenter prospective trial of 1666 anastomoses. World J Surg. 1998; 22: 78–86; discussion 87.10.1007/s0026899003539465766
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/prilozi-2016-0008 | Journal eISSN: 1857-8985 | Journal ISSN: 1857-9345
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 75 - 83
Published on: Jul 15, 2016
Published by: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Anastomosis,
Colon,
Rectum,
Leakage,
Stenosis
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Basic medical science,
History and ethics of medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Clinical medicine, other,
Social sciences,
Education,
Education, other

© 2016 Svetozar Antovic, Aleksandar Mitevski, Aleksandar Karagozov, Biljana Kuzmanovska, Nikola Jankulovski, published by Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 37 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)Next article