Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical Properties between the Fiber-Reinforced Composite and Zirconium Posts Cover

Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical Properties between the Fiber-Reinforced Composite and Zirconium Posts

Open Access
|Apr 2016

References

  1. 1. Kovacevska G. Stomatoprosthetic rehabilitation of remaining radix with metal post and core restorations as abutments of fixed structures, Skopje, 1995th 2.
  2. 2. Jovanovski S., Evaluation of the impact of surface treatment of ceramic post and core restorations and their effect on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, Skopje. 2012, 102-124.
  3. 3. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent. 1978; 39: 400-405.10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80156-5
  4. 4. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63: 529-536.10.1016/0022-3913(90)90070-S
  5. 5. Rosen H. Operative procedures on mutilated endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1961; 11: 973-986.10.1016/0022-3913(61)90158-5
  6. 6. Silverstein WH. The reinforcement of weakened pulpless teeth. J. Prosthet Dent. 1964; 14: 372-381.10.1016/0022-3913(64)90098-8
  7. 7. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984a; 51: 780-784.10.1016/0022-3913(84)90376-7
  8. 8. Peroz I, Blankenstein F, Lange K-P, Naumann M. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores-a review. Quintessence Int. 2005; 36: 737-746.
  9. 9. Guzy GE, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endopost reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent. 1979; 42:39-44.10.1016/0022-3913(79)90328-7
  10. 10. Trabert KC, Caput AA, Abou-Rass M. Tooth fracture- a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endod. 1978; 4: 341-345.10.1016/S0099-2399(78)80232-5
  11. 11. Tjan AH, Whang SB. Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thicknesses of buccal dentin walls. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53: 496-500.10.1016/0022-3913(85)90633-X
  12. 12. Naumann M, Preuss A, Rosentritt M. Effect of incomplete crown ferrules on load capacity of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with fiber posts, composite build-ups, and all-ceramic crowns: an in vitro evaluation after chewing simulation. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006; 64: 31-36.10.1080/0001635050033112016428180
  13. 13. Lang H, Korkmaz Y, Schneider K, Raab WH-M. Impact of endodontic treatments on the rigidity of the root. J Dent Res. 2006; 85: 364-368.10.1177/15440591060850041616567560
  14. 14. Nergiz I, Schmage P, Özcan M, Platzer U. Effect of length and diameter of tapered posts on the retention. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29: 28-34.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00806.x
  15. 15. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowelrestored teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94: 321-329.10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.07.003
  16. 16. Qualtrough AJE, Chandler NP, Purton DG. A comparison of the retention of tooth-colored posts. Quintessence Int. 2003; 34: 199-201.
  17. 17. Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the retentive and photoelastic properties of two prefabricated endodontic post systems. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26: 488-494.10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00420.x
  18. 18. Shillingburg Jr HT, Fisher DW, Dewhirst RB. Restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1970; 24: 401-409.10.1016/0022-3913(70)90081-8
  19. 19. Morgano SM, Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 69: 11-16.
  20. 20. Hew YS, Purton DG, Love RM. Evaluation of prefabricated root canal posts. J Oral Rehabil. 2001; 28: 207-211.
  21. 21. Morgano SM, Hashem AF, Fotoohi K, Rose L. A nationwide survey of contemporary philosophies and techniques of restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 72: 259-267.10.1016/0022-3913(94)90339-5
  22. 22. Purton DG, Love RM, Chandler NP. Rigidity and retention of ceramic root canal posts. Oper Dent. 2000; 25: 223-227.
  23. 23. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and force of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent. 1999; 27: 275-278.10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00066-9
  24. 24. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. A new concept of corono-radicular econstruction: the Composipost (2). Chir Dent Fr. 1990; 60: 69-77.
  25. 25. King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 1990; 17: 599-609.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1990.tb01431.x2283555
  26. 26. Isidor F, Ödman P, Brøndum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1996; 9: 131-136.
  27. 27. Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent. 2000a; 13: 15B-18B.
  28. 28. Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B. Influence of clinical baseline findings on the survival of 2 post systems: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2007; 20: 173-178.
  29. 29. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NHJ. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal and ceramic postand- core systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17: 476-482.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/prilozi-2015-0089 | Journal eISSN: 1857-8985 | Journal ISSN: 1857-9345
Language: English
Page range: 138 - 149
Published on: Apr 14, 2016
Published by: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2016 Vesna Jurukovska-Shotarovska, Biljana Kapusevska, published by Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.