Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Overdentures on Implants for Better Quality of Life Among the Fully Edentulous Patients – Case Reports Cover

Overdentures on Implants for Better Quality of Life Among the Fully Edentulous Patients – Case Reports

PRILOZI
Volume 36 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)
By: Julijana Nikolovska,  Dragan Petrovski,  Nikola Petricevic,  Biljana Kapusevska and  Vesna Korunoska-Stevkovska  
Open Access
|Dec 2015

References

  1. 1. Locker D. Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health. 1988; 5(1): 3-18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Gerritsen A, Allen P, Witter D, Bronkhorst E, Creugerrs N. Tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health and Quality Life Outcomes. 2010; 8: 126. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-126.10.1186/1477-7525-8-126
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Nikolovska J, Kenig N. Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in Patients Wearing Fixed Partial Dentures. Coll. Antropol. 2014; 38(3): 987-992.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Nikolovska J, Petrovski D. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) Before and After Prosthodontic Treatment with Full Removable Dentures. Balk J Stom. 2012; 16: 169-172.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. John MT, et al. OHRQoL in patients treated with fixed, removable and complete dentures 1 month and 6 to 12months after treatment. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17: 503-511.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Petricevic N, Celebic A, Papic M, Rener-Sitar K. The Croatian version of the Oral Health Impact Profilequestionnaire. Collegium Antropologicum. 2009; 3: 315-321.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Kenig N, Nikolovska J. Assessing the Psychometric Characteristics of the Macedonian Version of the Oral Health Impact Profile Questionnaire (OHIP-MAC49). Oral Health Dental Management. 2012; 11(1): 29-38.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Szentpetery A, John MT, Slade G, Setz J. Problems Reportedby Patients before and after Prosthodontic Treatment. IntJProsthodont. 2005; 18(2): 124-131.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Carlsson GE. Clinical morbidity and sequelae of treatment with complete dentures.J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 79: 17-23.10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70188-X
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Kreisler M, Behneke N, Behneke A, D’Hoedt B. Residual ridge resorption in the edentulous maxila in patients with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: an 8-years retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16: 265-300.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Carlsson GE. Responses of jaw bone to pressure. Gerodontology. 2004; 21: 65-70.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2004.00005.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Vercruyssen M, Marcelis K, Coucke W, Naert I, Quirynen M. Long-term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient-centred outcome) of the two-implants- supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Apr 1; 21(4): 357-365.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01849.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Batenburg RHK, Raghoebar GM, Van Oort RP, Heijdenrijk K, Boering G. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosteal implants. A prospective, comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surgery. 1998b; 27: 435-439.10.1016/S0901-5027(98)80032-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Wismeijer D, Van Waas MAJ, Mulder J, Vermeeren JI, Kalk W. Clinical and radiographical results of patients treated with three treatment modalities for overdentures on implants of ITI dental implant system. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999; 10: 297-306.10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100406.x10551072
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Mau J, Behneke A, Behneke N, Fritzemeier CU, Gomez- Roman G, D’Hoedt B, Spiekermann H, Strunz V, Yong M. Randomized multicenter comparison of 2 IMZ and 4 TPS screw implants supporting bar-retained overdentures in 425 edentulous mandibles. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003; 18: 835-847.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Visser A, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJA, Batenburg RHK, Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants. A 5-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16: 19-25.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01085.x15642027
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Stoker GT, Wismeijer D, Van Waas MAJ. An eightyear follow- up to a randomized clinical trial of aftercare and cost-analysis with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Dent Res. 2007; 86: 276-280.10.1177/15440591070860031517314262
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Petricevic N, Celebic A, Rener-Sitar K. Improvement of Patient’s Satisfaction 3 and Oral Health Related Quality of Life by the 4 Implant and Prosthodontic Treatment. Oral Health/ Book 2, 2012; In Tech: 1-28.10.5772/33735
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Heckmann SM, Schrott A, Graef F, Wichmann MG, Weber HP. Mandibular two-implant telescopic overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Oct; 15(5): 560-9.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01064.x15355398
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Andreiotelli M, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 May-Jun; 23(3): 195-203.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Laurito D, Lamazza L, Spink MJ, De Biase A. Tissue- supported dental implant prosthesis (overdenture): the search for the ideal protocol. A literature review. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2012 Jan; 3(1): 2-10. Epub 2012 May 3.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Murphy WM. Clinical and experimental bone changes after intraosseous implantation. J Prosthet Dent. 1995; 73: 31-35.10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80269-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Von Wowern N, Gotfredsen K. Implant-supported overdentures, a prevention of bone loss in edentulous mandibles? A 5-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12: 19-25.10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001019.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Van der Bilt A, Burgers M, van Kampen FM, Cune MS. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures and oral function.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21: 1209-1213.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01915.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Balaguer J, García B, Peñarrocha M, Peñarrocha M. Satisfaction of patients fitted with implant-retained overdentures. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011; 16: 204-209.10.4317/medoral.16.e204
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Naert I, Alsaadi G, Van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M. A 10- year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Sep-Oct; 19(5): 695-702.10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.02.010
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Naert I, Quirynen M, Hooghe M, Van Steenberghe D. A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Branemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71: 486-492.10.1016/0022-3913(94)90188-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Mericske-Stern R. Treatment outcomes with implantsupported overdentures: clinical considerations. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 79: 66-73.10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70196-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Visser A, Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jul; 20(7): 722-728.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01710.x19489933
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Takeshita S, Kanazawa M, Minakuchi S. Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems. Dent. Mater. J. 2011; 30: 928-934.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Tokuhisa M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: Comparison of load transfer and denture stability. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16: 128-134.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Aglietta M, Siciliano VI, Zwahlen M, Brägger U, Pjetursson BE, Lang NP, Salvi GE. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 20, 2009; 441-451.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01706.x19522975
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Pjetursson BE, Brägger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin. OralImpl. Res. 18 (Suppl. 3), 2007; 97-113. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x17594374
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/prilozi-2015-0071 | Journal eISSN: 1857-8985 | Journal ISSN: 1857-9345
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 225 - 234
Published on: Dec 30, 2015
Published by: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
overdentures,
implants,
quality of life
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Basic medical science,
History and ethics of medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Clinical medicine, other,
Social sciences,
Education,
Education, other

© 2015 Julijana Nikolovska, Dragan Petrovski, Nikola Petricevic, Biljana Kapusevska, Vesna Korunoska-Stevkovska, published by Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 36 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)Next article