Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Publication Ethics: Whose Problem is It? Cover

Publication Ethics: Whose Problem is It?

PRILOZI
Volume 35 (2014): Issue 3 (December 2014)
By:   
Open Access
|Mar 2015
References

References

  1. 1. Wager E, Fiack S, Graf C, et al. Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2009; 35: 348-53.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One. 2009; 4(5): e5738.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Committee on Publication Ethics (2008). Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. Available at: http://publicationethics.org/files/Code of conduct for journal editors_0.pdf Accessed 19 July 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. WAME Policy Statement (2009): The relationship between journal editors-in-chief and owners. Available at: http://www wame org/resources/policies#independence Accessed: June 8, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Smith R. Editor's Choice. BMJ 2004, doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7457.0-g.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Graf C, Wager E, Bowman A, et al. Blackwell Publishing guidelines on publication ethics. Int J Clin Pract. 2006; 61 (Suppl 152): 1.26.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Wager E. COPE objectives and achievements 1997. 2012. La Presse Medicale. 2012; 41: 861.6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Anonymous. Statement of disputed authorship. British Journal of Obstetrics ' Gynaecology. 2006; 113, i.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Smith R. Another editor bites the dust. BMJ. 1999a; 319: 272.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Smith R. The firing of Brother George. BMJ. 1999b; 318: 210.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Spurgeon D. CMA draws criticism for sacking editors. BMJ. 2006; 332: 503.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Fletcher SW, Fletcher RH. Medical editors, journal owners, and the sacking of George Lundberg. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1999; 14: 200.202.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Monbiot G. Academic publishers make Murdoch look like a socialist. The Guardian, 29 August 2011. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/academic-publishers-murdoch-socialist Accessed:19 July 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Wager E. Coping with scientific misconduct. BMJ. 2011; 343: d6586.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Callaway E. Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities. Nature. 2011; 479: 15.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Marcus A. Japanese anesthesiologist fabricated data in 172 studies. Anesthesiology News July 2, 2012. Available at: http://www.anesthesiologynews.com//ViewArticle. aspx?ses=ogst&d=Web+Exclusives&d_id=175&i=ISSUE%3a+June+2012&i_id=854&a_id=21194 Accessed: July 19, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature. Lessons from the Poehlman case. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2006; 144: 609.13.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Elia N, Tramer M, Wager E. Fate of articles that warranted retraction due to ethical concerns: a descriptive cross-sectional study. PLOS One. 2014; 9: e85846.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Wager E, Kleinert S. Cooperation between research institutions and journals on reseach integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Maturitas. 2012; 72: 165.9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Wager E. Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters. Maturitas. 2008; 62: 109.12.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Wager E. Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship? Medscape General Medicine. 2007; 9(3): 16.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Shao J, Shen H. The outflow of academic papers from China: why is it happening and can it be stemmed? Learned Publishing. 2011; 24: 95.7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Fauber J. Journal editor gets royalties as articles favor devices. 2010. Available at:www.jsonlinecom/watchdog/watchdogreports/80036277.html Accessed: May 9, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Lenzer J. Journal editor gets $20m in royalties and $2m in fees from device manufacturer. BMJ 2010; 340: c495.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Marusi. A, Bates T, Ani. A, Marusi. M. How the structure of contribution disclosure statements affects validity of authorship: a randomized study in a general medical journal. Current Medical Research ' Opinion. 2006; 22(6): 1035.44.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Zarin DA, Tse T, Ide NC. Trial registration at ClinicalTrials.gov between May and October 2005. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005; 335: 2779.87.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Wager E, Williams P. Hardly “worth the effort”? Medical journals' policies and their editors and publicshers views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitativeand qualitative study. BMJ. 2013; 347: f5248.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Kleinert S. Checking for plagiarism, duplicate publication, and text recyling. Lancet. 2011; 377: 281.2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. 29. White C. Software makes it easier for journals to spot image manipulation. BMJ. 2007; 334: 607.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Rossner M. How to guard against image fraud. The Scientist. March 2006; 24.5.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/prilozi-2015-0004 | Journal eISSN: 1857-8985 (formerly 0350-1914) | Journal ISSN: 1857-9345
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 23 - 27
Published on: Mar 1, 2015
Published by: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year
Keywords:
Publication ethics,
research misconduct,
journals
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Education,
Education, other

© 2015 Elizabeth Wager, published by Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 35 (2014): Issue 3 (December 2014)
Previous article
Next article