Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Information and Communication Technologies in Electoral Processes: How do they help voters abroad?

Open Access
|Jan 2016

References

  1. Bauböck, R. (2005). ‘Expansive Citizenship: Voting beyond Territory and Membership’. Political Science and Politics, Vol. 38.10.1017/S1049096505050341
  2. Blais, A., Labbe-St-Vincent, S., Jean-Francois, L., Sauger, N. & Van Der Straeten, K. (2010). ‘Strategic Vote Choice in One-round and Two-round Elections: An Experimental Study’. Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 64, pp. 637-645.
  3. Brunell, T. L. & Clarke, H. D. (2010). ‘Who Wants Electoral Competition and Who Wants to Win?’ Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 65, pp. 124-137.
  4. Caltech, MIT. (2001). Voting. What is, What it could be. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  5. Castells, M., Tubella, I., Sancho, T. & Roca, M. (2007). La transicion a la sociedad red. Barcelona: Ariel.
  6. Castells, M. (1997). La era de la información. Vol I. La Sociedad red. Madrid: Siglo XXI Editores.
  7. Communities, E. (2002). eEurope 2005: An information society for all. Brussels: European Commission.
  8. Communities, E. (2003). The Role of eGovernment for Europe’s Future. Brussels: European Commission.
  9. Communities, E. (2005). i2010 – Una sociedad de la información europea para el crecimiento y el empleo. Brussels: European Commission.
  10. Dahl, R. (1963). Modern Political Analysis. E Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  11. Dahlberg, L. (2001). ‘The Internet and Democratic Discourse. Exploring the Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums extending the Public Sphere’. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 4, pp. 615-633.
  12. Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges, democratic choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268436.001.0001
  13. European Commission. (2001). Voting System Standards. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
  14. European Commission. (2002). eEurope 2005: An information society for all. An action plan to be presented in view of the Sevilla European Council. Sevilla. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
  15. Friis, C. & Traunmüller, R. (2002). Knowledge Management in e-Government. Copenhagen: University of Linz and Roskilde.
  16. Gabel, M. J. (2013). ‘The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws in the 1990 Hungarian Elections’. Comparative Politics, Vol. 27, pp. 205-214.
  17. Guy, B. & Pierre, J. (1998). ‘Governance without government? Rethinking public administration’. Journal of public administration research and theory, Vol. 8, pp. 223-244.
  18. Held, D. (1997). La democracia y el orden global; del estado moderno al gobierno cosmopolita. Madrid: Alianza.
  19. Heeks, R. (2001). ‘Understanding e-Governance for Development’. i-Government Working Paper Series, Vol. 11.10.2139/ssrn.3540058
  20. IDEA & IFE (2007). Voting from Abroad. Mexico: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
  21. Lanvin, B. & Cornelius, P. K. (2003). The Global Information Technology Report 2002–2003. New York: Oxford University Press.
  22. Natera, A. (2001). El liderazgo politico en la sociedad democratica. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales.
  23. OECD (1999). ‘Public Management and Public Management Service. Impact of the Emerging Information Society’, Policy Department Process and Democratic Quality, OECD.
  24. Parrado, S. (2002). Transition problems to e-administration. First International Conference “European Experience in e-Government Development”. Bulgarian Association of Information and Technologies. Sofia, Bulgaria.
  25. Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139172493
  26. Sartori, G. (1962). Democratic Theory. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
  27. Subirats, J. et al. (2008). Análisis de Gestión de Políticas Públicas. Barcelona: Ariel Ciencia Política.
  28. Trechsel, A. H., Méndez, F. & Kies, R. (2003). ‘The European Parliament and the Challenge of Internet Voting’. Policy Paper, Vol. 3, pp. 36-36.
  29. United Nations. (2001). Benchmarking e-Government: A Global Perspective. New York: United Nations Publication.
  30. United Nations. (2008). UN e-Government survey 2008. New York: United Nations Publications.10.18356/047afd3a-en
  31. United Nations. (2005). Global e-Government Readiness Report 2005. From e-Government to e-Inclusion. New York: United Nations Publications.
  32. United Nations (2005). Global e-Government Readiness Report 2005 From E-government to E-inclusion. Brussels: United Nations Publications.
  33. United Nations. (2008). e-Government Survey 2008. New York: United Nations Publications.10.18356/047afd3a-en
Language: English
Page range: 18 - 33
Published on: Jan 19, 2016
Published by: University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2016 Javier Lorenzo-Rodriguez, published by University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.