Have a personal or library account? Click to login
CFD Modeling of Syngas Combustion and Emissions for Marine Gas Turbine Applications Cover

CFD Modeling of Syngas Combustion and Emissions for Marine Gas Turbine Applications

Open Access
|Oct 2016

References

  1. 1. VianaM., et al., Impact of maritime transport emissions on coastal air quality in Europe. Atmospheric Environment 90,pp. 96-105, 2014.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.046
  2. 2. Wang C., Corbett J.J., Firestone J., Improving spatial representation of global ship emissions inventories. Environmental Science and Technology 42, pp. 193-199,2008.10.1021/es070079918350896
  3. 3. EEA.: Transport indicators tracking progress towards environmental targets in Europe. The Contribution of transport to air quality.EEA, Copenhagen, 2012.
  4. 4. Eyringer V., Köhler H. W., Lauer A., Lemper B., Emissions from international shipping: 2. Impact of future technologies on scenarios until 2050. J. Geophys 110, D17306,2005.10.1029/2004JD005620
  5. 5. Corbett J.J., Winebrake J.J., Green E.H., KasibhatlaP., Eyring V., LauerA., Mortality from ship emissions: a global assessment. Environmental Science and Technology 41, pp. 8512-85182007.10.1021/es071686z18200887
  6. 6. Endresen Ø., Sørgård E., Sundet J.K., Dalsøren S.B., Isaksen I.S., Berglen T.F., Gravir G., Emission from international sea transportation and environmental impact. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, pp. 108, 2003.10.1029/2002JD002898
  7. 7. Ülpre H., Eames I., Environmental policy constraints for acidic exhaust gas scrubber discharges from ships. Marine Pollution Bulletin 88,pp. 292-301, 2014.10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.08.02725284442
  8. 8. IMO.: Second IMO GHG study. London, UK, 2009.
  9. 9. RavenJ., Caldeira K., Elderfield H., Hoegh-Guldberg O., Liss P., Riebesell U., Shepherd J., Turley C., Watson A.: Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. The Royal Society: The Science Policy Section, 2005.
  10. 10. Blatcher D., Eames I., Compliance of royal navy ships with nitrogen oxide emissions legislation. Mar. Pollut. Bull 74, pp. 10-18, 2013.10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.07.01023906471
  11. 11. CalleyaJ., PawlingR., GreigA., Ship impact model for technical assessment and selection of Carbon Dioxide Reducing Technologies (CRTs). Ocean Engineering 97, pp. 82-89,2015.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.12.014
  12. 12. AzimovU., TomitaE., KawaharaN., and DolS. S., Combustion characteristics of syngas and natural gas in micro-pilot ignited dual-fuel engine. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 6(12), pp. 1595-1602, 2012.
  13. 13. Weaver C.: Natural gas vehicles - a review of the state of the art. SAE technical paper 892133, doi:10.4271/892133, 1989.
  14. 14. Nichols R.J., The challenges of change in the auto industry: Why alternative fuels? J.Eng.Gas Turb Power 116,pp. 727-32, 1994.10.1115/1.2906879
  15. 15. Lieuwen T., Yang V., Yetter R.: Synthesis gas combustion: Fundamentals and applications. Taylor & Francis Group, 2010.10.1201/9781420085358
  16. 16. MuradovN. Z., and VezirogluT. N., Green path from fossil-based to hydrogen economy: An overview of carbon neutral technologies. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33,pp. 6804-6839, 2008.
  17. 17. RiboldiL.,Bolland O., Pressure swing adsorption for coproduction of power and ultrapure H2 in an IGCC plant with CO2 capture. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 41(25), pp. 10646-10660, 2016.
  18. 18. Funke H. H.-W., et al., Experimental and numerical study of the micro mix combustion principle applied for hydrogen and hydrogen- rich syngas as fuel with increased energy density for industrial gas turbine. Applications Energy Procedia 61, pp. 1736 - 1739, 2014.
  19. 19. BouvetN., et al., Characterization of syngas laminar flames using the Bunsen burner configuration. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 36, pp. 992-1005, 2011.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.147
  20. 20. Domachowski Z., Dzida M., An analysis of characteristics of ship gas turbine propulsion system (in the light of the requirements for ship operation in the Baltic Sea). Pol. Marit, [special issue], pp. 73-78, 2004.
  21. 21. Khalil A. E. E., Gupta A. K., Swirling flow-field for colorless distributed combustion. Applied Energy 113, pp. 208-218,2014.10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.029
  22. 22. Lilley D.G., Modeling of combustor swirl flows. Acta Astronautica 1(9-10), pp. 1129-1147,1974.
  23. 23. Syred N., Beér J.M., Combustion in swirling flows: A review. Combustion and Flame 23(2), pp.143-201, 1974.10.1016/0010-2180(74)90057-1
  24. 24. Osvaldo V-Z. M., Syred N., Agustín V-M., Daniel D. R-U., Flashback avoidance in swirling flow burners. Ingeniería, Investigacióny Tecnología 15(4), pp. 603-614,2014.10.1016/S1405-7743(14)70658-4
  25. 25. Zaid A., FaragA.: Effect of secondary air configuration in gas turbine combustor firing natural gas. Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition IMECE2014, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, November 14-20, 2014.10.1115/IMECE2014-36255
  26. 26. Beer J.M., and Chigier, N.A.: Combustion Aerodynamics, Applied Science Publishers, London, England, 1972.
  27. 27. GAMBIT team: GAMBIT program user guide, September 2006.
  28. 28. Knopp T., Eisfeld B., Calvo J. B., A new extension for k -ῼ turbulence models to account for wall roughness. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 30, pp. 54-65, 2009.10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.09.009
  29. 29. Cheng P., Two-dimensional radiating gas flow by a moment method. AIAA Journal 2, pp. 1662-1664, 1964.
  30. 30. Siegel R., Howell J. R.: Thermal radiation heat transfer. Hemisphere, Washington, DC, USA, 1992.
  31. 31. Ahmed A. S., Velocity measurements and turbulence statistics of a confined isothermal swirling flow. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 17, pp. 256 -264, 1998.10.1016/S0894-1777(97)10039-5
  32. 32. AndreiniA., et al., CFD analysis of NOx emissions of a natural gas lean premixed burner for heavy duty gas turbine. Energy Procedia 81, pp. 967 - 976, 2015.10.1016/j.egypro.2015.12.155
  33. 33. Ghenai C., Combustion of syngas fuel in gas turbine can combustor. Hindawi publishing corporation. advances in Mechanical Engineering, doi:10.1155/2010/342357, pp. 1-13, 2010.
  34. 34. Whitty K. J., Zhang H. R., and Eddings E. G., Emissions from syngas combustion. Combust. Sci. and Tech. 180, pp. 1117-1136, 2008.
  35. 35. Chacartegui R., et al., Analysis of main gaseous emissions of heavy duty gas turbines burning several syngas fuels. Fuel Processing Technology 92, pp. 213-220, 2011.10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.03.014
  36. 36. WelayaY.M., Mosleh M., Ammar N.R., Thermodynamic Analysis of Combined Solid Fuel Cell with a Steam Turbine Power Plant for Marine Applications. Brodgradnja/ Shipbuilding 65(1), pp. 97-115, 2014.
  37. 37. Welaya Y.M., Mosleh M., Ammar N.R., Thermodynamic analysis of a combined gas turbine power plant with a solid oxide fuel cell for marine applications. Int. J. Naval Archit. Ocean Eng. 5 , pp. 404-413, 2013.10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0151
  38. 38. Mustafi N.N., Miraglia Y.C., Raine R.R., Bansal P.K., and Elder S.T., Sparkignition engine performance with ‘Powergas’ fuel (mixture of CO=H2): A comparison with gasoline and natural gas. Fuel 85(12-13), pp. 1605-1612, 2006.
  39. 39. Ratafia-Brown, J.A., Manfredo L.M., Hoffman J.W., Ramezan M., and Steigel G.J.: An environmental assessment of IGCC power systems. Presented at the Nineteenth Annual Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 23-27 September, 2002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pomr-2016-0030 | Journal eISSN: 2083-7429 | Journal ISSN: 1233-2585
Language: English
Page range: 39 - 49
Published on: Oct 20, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Nader R. Ammar, Ahmed I. Farag, published by Gdansk University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.