Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Narrative Writing in Digital Formats: Interpreting the Impact of Audience Cover

Narrative Writing in Digital Formats: Interpreting the Impact of Audience

Psychology of Language and Communication
Volume 19 (2015): Issue 3 (December 2015)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|May 2016
References

References

  1. Alamargot, D., Caporossi, G., Chesnet, D., & Ros, C. (2011). What makes a skilled writer? Working memory and audience awareness during text composition.,(5), 505–516.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Applebee, A.N. & Langer, J.A. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools.,(6), 14–27.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Bangerter, A. & Clark, H. (2003). Navigating joint projects with dialogue.,(2), 195–225.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987).. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Berninger, V.W., Fuller, F., & Whitaker, D. (1996). A process model of writing development across the life span.,(3), 193–218.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Biesenbach-Lucas, S. & Weasenforth, D. (2001). E-Mail and word processing in the ESL classroom: How the medium affects the message.,(1), 135–165.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Black, R.W. (2009). English-language learners, Fan Communities, and 21st-century skills.,(8), 688–697.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Bos, N. & Krajcik, J. (1998, April). Students’ awareness of audience in web-published science writing. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Brennan, S. & Clark, H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.,(6), 1482–1493.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975).. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Carvalho, J.B. (2002). Developing audience awareness in writing.,(3), 271–282.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Clark, H.H. (1996).(pp. 221–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Clark, H. (2003). Pointing and placing. In S. Kita (Ed.),t (pp. 243–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Clark, H. & Brennan, S. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine & S.D. Teasley (Eds.),(pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Clark, H. & Fox Tree, J. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking., 84 (1), 73–111.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Clark, H. & Krych, M. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding.,(1), 62–81.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Clark, H. & Marshall, C. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. Joshi, B. Webber, & I. Sag (Eds.),(pp. 414–465). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Clark, H. & Murphy, G. L. (1983). Audience design in meaning and reference. In J.F. LeNy & W. Kintsch (Eds.),(pp. 287–299). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Clark, H. & Murphy, G. (1982). Audience design in meaning and reference.,, 287–299.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Clark, H. & Schaefer, E. (1989). Contributing to discourse.,(2), 259–294.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Clark, H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process.,(1), 1–39.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Cohen, M. & Riel, M. (1989). The effect of distant audiences on students’ writing.(2), 143–159.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list., 34 (2), 213–238.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. da Cunha Recuero, R. (2008). Information flow and social capital in weblogs: A case study in the Brazilian blogosphere. In P. Brusilowsky & H. Davis (Eds.),(pp. 97–106). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. DeVoss, D.N., Eidman-Aadahl, E., & Hicks, T. (2010).. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Ericsson, K.A. & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory.,(2), 211–245.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Fahey, K., Lawrence, J., & Paratore, J. (2007). Using electronic portfolios to make learning public.,(6), 460–471.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Flower, L. & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing.,(4), 365–387.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Goffman, E. (1967).New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Graham, S. & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students.,(3), 445–476.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Hayes, J.R., & Nash, J.G. (1996). On the nature of planning in writing. In C.M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.),(pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Heisler, J.M. & Crabill, S.L. (2006). Who are “stinkybug” and “Packerfan4”? Email pseudonyms and participants’ perceptions of demography, productivity, and personality.,(1), 114–135.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Holliway, D. (2004). Through the eyes of my reader: A strategy for improving audience perspective in children’s descriptive writing.,(4), 334–350.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Holliway, D. & McCutchen, D. (2004). Audience perspective in young writers’ composing and revising.,, 87–101.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Horton, W. & Gerrig, R. (2002). Speakers’experiences and audience design: Knowing when and knowing how to adjust utterances to addressees.,(4), 589–606.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Huffaker, D. (2004). The educated blogger: Using weblogs to promote literacy in the classroom.,(6), 91–98.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., Horst, H.A., Lange, P.G., Mahendran, D., Martinez, K.Z., Pascoe, C.J., Perkel, D., Robinson, L., Sims, C., & Tripp, L. (2009).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Kellogg, R.T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective.,(1), 1–26.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Kroll, B.M. (1984). Writing for readers: Three perspectives on audience.,(2), 172–185.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Kurcz, I. (2004). Communicative competence and theory of mind.,(2), 5–18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Lam, W.S.E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the internet.,(3), 457–482.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production.,(3), 307–322.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Magnifico, A.M. (2010). Writing for whom? Cognition, motivation, and a Writer’s audience.,(3), 167–184.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Marwick, A.E. & Boyd, D. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.,(1), 114–133.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition.,(3), 299–325.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing.(1), 13–23.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. McCutchen, D., Covill, A., Hoyne, S., & Mildes, K. (1994). Individual differences in writing: Implications of translating fluency.,(2), 256–266.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Piche, G. & Rubin, D. (1979). Development in syntactic and strategic aspects of audience adaptation skills in written persuasive communication.,(4), 293–316.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Piché, G., Rubin, D., & Michlin, M.L. (1978). Age and social class in children’s persuasive communication appeals.,(3), 773–780.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. Potter, J. (2012).. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Rijlaarsdam, G., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., & Kieft, M. (2006). Writing Experiment Manuals in Science Education: The impact of writing, genre, and audience.,(2-3), 203–233.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  52. Rubin, D. (1982). Adapting syntax in writing to varying audiences as a function of age and social cognitive ability.,(2), 497–510.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  53. Rubin, D. (1997). Writing for readers: The primacy of audience in composing.,, 53–73.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Russell, J., Bachorowski, J., & Fernandez-Dols, J. (2003). Facial and vocal expressions of emotion.,(1), 329–349.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  55. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.,(4), 696–735.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Shippen, M.E., Houchins, D.E., Puckett, D., & Ramsey, M. (2007). Preferred writing topics of urban and rural middle school students.,(1), 59–66.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Traxler, M. & Gernsbacher, M. (1992). Improving written communication through minimal feedback.,(1), 1–22.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  58. Traxler, M. & Gernsbacher, M. (1993). Improving written communication through perspective-taking.,(3), 311–334.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  59. West, K. (2008). Weblogs and literary response: Socially situated identities and hybrid social languages in English class blogs.,(7), 588–598.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  60. Witte, S. (2007). “That’s online writing, not boring school writing”: Writing with blogs and the talkback project.,(2), 92–96.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  61. Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (1 998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy & complexity. Honolulu, Hawai’i: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i (University of Hawai’i Press).
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2015-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 (formerly 1234-2238) | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 201 - 221
Published on: May 12, 2016
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
audience,
digital writing,
experimental design,
online forums
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Psychology,
Applied psychology

© 2016 Joshua Fahey Lawrence, Melissa Niiya, March Warschauer, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 19 (2015): Issue 3 (December 2015)
Previous article
Next article