Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Effect of Concurrent Visual Feedback on Controlling Swimming Speed Cover

The Effect of Concurrent Visual Feedback on Controlling Swimming Speed

Open Access
|Jun 2016

References

  1. 1. Figueiredo P., Machado J.L., Vilas-Boas J.P., Fernandes R.J. (2011). Reconstruction error of calibration volume’s coordinates for 3D swimming kinematics. Journal of Human Kinetics 29, 35-40.10.2478/v10078-011-0037-6358862423486761
  2. 2. Fernandes R.J., Ribeiro J., Figueiredo P., Seifert L., Vilas-Boas J.P. (2012). Kinematics of the hip and body center of mass in front crawl. Journal of Human Kinetics 33, 15-23.10.2478/v10078-012-0040-6358867523486784
  3. 3. Soares S.M., Fernandes R.J., Machado J.L., Maia J.A., Daly D.J., Vilas-Boas J.P. (2014). Fatigue thresholds assessments in 50 m all out swimming. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 9(6), 959-65.10.1123/ijspp.2013-041924622856
  4. 4. Perez P., Llana S., Brizuela G., Encarnacion A. (2009). Effects of three feedback conditions on aerobic swim speeds. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 8, 30-36.
  5. 5. Zatoń K., Szczepan S. (2014). The impact of immediate verbal feedback on the improvement of swimming technique. Journal of Human Kinetics 41, 129-137.10.2478/hukin-2014-0042412044725114741
  6. 6. Schmidt R.A., Lee T.D. (1999). Motor control and learning: a behavioural emphasis. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.
  7. 7. Salmoni A.W., Schmidt R.A., Walter Ch.B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin 95, 355-386.10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355
  8. 8. Magill R.A. (1994). The influence of augmented feedback during skill learning depends on characteristics of the skill and the learner. Quest 46, 314-327.10.1080/00336297.1994.10484129
  9. 9. Newell K.M., Walter C.B. (1981). Kinematic and kinetic parameters as information feedback in motor skill acquisition. Journal of Human Movement Studies 7, 235-254.
  10. 10. Schmidt R.A., Young D.E. (1991). Methodology for motor learning: a paradigm for kinematic feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior 23, 13-24.10.1080/00222895.1991.994159014766528
  11. 11. Carroll W., Bandura A. (1990). Representational guidance of action production in observational learning: A causal analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior 22, 85-97.10.1080/00222895.1990.1073550315111282
  12. 12. Proteau L., Carnahan H. (2001). What causes specificity of practice in a manual aiming movement: vision dominance or transformation errors? Journal of Motor Behavior 33(3), 226-234.10.1080/0022289010960190811495827
  13. 13. Seat J.E., Wrisberg C.A. (1996). The visual instruction system. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 67, 106-108.10.1080/02701367.1996.106079328736001
  14. 14. Little W.S., McGullagh P. (1989). Motivation orientation and modeled instruction strategies: The effects of form and accuracy. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 11, 41-53.10.1123/jsep.11.1.41
  15. 15. Silverman S.S., Woods A.M., Subramaniam P.R. (1998). Task structures, feedback to individual students, and student skill level in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 69, 420-424.10.1080/02701367.1998.106077189864762
  16. 16. Marteniuk R.G. (1976). Information processing in motor skills. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  17. 17. Lee T., Swinnen S., Serrien J. (1994). Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest 46, 328-344.10.1080/00336297.1994.10484130
  18. 18. Weinberg S., Gould D. (1995). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.
  19. 19. Seifert L., Chollet D. (2005). A new index of flat breaststroke propulsion: A comparison of elite men and women. Journal of Sports Sciences 23, 309-320.10.1080/0264041041000172996415966349
  20. 20. Vezos N., Gourgoulis V., Aggeloussis N., Kasimatis P., Christoforidis C., Mavromatis G. (2007). Underwater stroke kinematics during breathing and breath-holding front crawl swimming. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 6, 58-62.
  21. 21. Adams J. (1971). A closed-loop theory for motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior 3, 111-150.10.1080/00222895.1971.1073489815155169
  22. 22. Sanchez X., Bampouras M.T. (2006). Augmented feedback over a short period of time: Does it improve netball goalshooting performance? International Journal of Sport Psychology 37, 349-358.
  23. 23. Gonzalez V., Sanchis E., Villalobos M., Brizuela G., Llana S., Tella V. (2002). A new electronic system for the control of swimming speed. In J.C. Chatard (ed.), Biomechanics and medicine in swimming IX (pp. 67-69). Saint-Etienne: University of Saint-Etienne.
  24. 24. Boyce B.A. (1991). The effects of an instructional strategy with two schedules of augmented KP feedback upon skill acquisition of a selected shooting task. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 11, 47-58.10.1123/jtpe.11.1.47
  25. 25. Wulf G., Shea C. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 185-211.10.3758/BF0319627612120783
  26. 26. Zatoń K., Klarowicz A. (2003). Speech as a factor causing the awareness of kinesthetic sensibility in the process of teaching-learning of motor function in swimming. Human Movement 2(8), 45-53.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pjst-2016-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2082-8799 | Journal ISSN: 1899-1998
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 6
Submitted on: Sep 4, 2015
|
Accepted on: Jan 27, 2016
|
Published on: Jun 15, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Stefan Szczepan, Krystyna Zatoń, Andrzej Klarowicz, published by University of Physical Education in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.