References
- 1. Chawla, P.R., Bajaj, I.B., Survase, S.A. & Singhal, R.S. (2009). Microbial cellulose: fermentative production and applications. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 47(2), 107–124.
- 2. Castro, C., Zuluaga, R., Álvarez, C., Putaux, J.L., Caro, G., Rojas, O.J., Mondragon, I. & Ganán, P. (2012). Bacterial cellulose produced by a new acid-resistant strain of Gluconacetobacter genus. Carbohyd. Polym. 89(4), 1033–1037. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.045.
- 3. Hameed, N.D., Al-Jailawi, M.H. & Jasim, H.M. (2012). Enhancement and optimization of cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus N2. Sci. J. King Faisal Univ. (Basic and Applied Sciences) 13(2), 77–89.
- 4. Nakagaito, A.N., Nogi, M. & Yano, H. (2010). Displays from transparent films of natural nanofibers. MRS Bulletin 35(3), 214–218. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/mrs2010.654
- 5. Saibuatong, O.A. & Phisalaphong, M. (2010). Novo aloe vera - bacterial cellulose composite film from biosynthesis. Carbohyd. Polym. 79(2), 455–460. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.08.039.
- 6. Dahman, Y., Jayasuriya, K.E. & Kalis, M. (2010). Potential of biocellulose nanofibers production from agricultural renewable resources: Preliminary study. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 162(6), 1647–1659. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-010-8946-8.
- 7. Hornung, M., Ludwig, M., Gerrard, A.M. & Schmauder, H.P. (2006). Optimizing the production of bacterial cellulose in surface culture: evaluation of substrate mass transfer influences on the bioreaction (Part 1). Eng. Life Sci. 6(6), 546–551. DOI: 10.1002/elsc.200620162.
- 8. Bielecki, S., Krystynowicz, A., Turkiewicz, M. & Kalinowska, H. (2005). Bacterial cellulose. In A. Steinbüchel & S.K. Rhee (Eds.), Polysaccharides and Polyamides in the Food Industry (pp. 31–85). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag.
- 9. Huang, Y., Zhu, C., Yang, J., Nie, Y., Chen, C. & Sun, D. (2013). Recent advances in bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 21(1), 1–30. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-013-0088-z.
- 10. Legge, R.L. (1990). Microbial cellulose as a specialty chemical. Biotechnol. Adv. 8(2), 303–319. DOI: 10.1016/0734-9750(90)91067-q.
- 11. Lin, S.P., Calvar, I.L., Catchmark, J.M., Liu, J.R., Demirci, A. & Cheng K.C. (2013). Biosynthesis, production and applications of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 20(5), 2191–2219. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-013-9994-3.
- 12. Ruka, D.R., Simon, G.P. & Dean, K.M. (2012). Altering the growth conditions of Gluconacetobacter xylinus to maximize the yield of bacterial cellulose. Carbohyd. Polym. 89(2), 613–622. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.059.
- 13. Surma-Ślusarska, B., Presler, S. & Danielewicz, D. (2008). Characteristics of bacterial cellulose obtained from Acetobacter xylinum culture for application in papermaking. Fibres Text. East. Eur. 4(69), 108–111.
- 14. El-Saied, H., Basta, A.H. & Gobran, R.H. (2004). Research progress in friendly environmental technology for the production of cellulose products (bacterial cellulose and its application). Polym-Plast. Technol. Eng. 43(3), 797–820. DOI: 10.1081/PPT-120038065.
- 15. Santos, S.M., Carbajo, J.M. & Villar, J.C. (2013). The effect of carbon and nitrogen sources on bacterial cellulose production and properties from Gluconacetobacter sucrofermentans CECT 7291 focused on its use in degraded paper restoration. BioResourses 8(3), 3630–3645.
- 16. Sheykhnazari, S., Tabarsa, T., Ashori, A., Shakeri, A. & Golalipour, M. (2011). Bacterial synthesized cellulose nanofibers; Effects of growth times and culture mediums on the structural characteristics. Carbohyd. Polym. 86(3), 1187–1191. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.011.
- 17. Păvăloiu, R.D., Stoica-Guzun, A. & Dobre, T. (2015). Swelling studies of composite hydrogels based on bacterial cellulose and gelatin. U.P.B. Sci. Bull. Ser. B 77(1), 53–62.
- 18. Cheng, Q., Wang, J., McNeel, J. & Jacobson, P. (2010). Water retention value measurements of cellulosic materials using a centrifuge technique. BioResourses 5(3), 1945–1954.
- 19. Tsouko, E., Kourmentza, C., Ladakis, D., Kopsahelis, N., Mandala, I., Papanikolaou, S., Paloukis, F., Alves, V. & Koutinas, A. (2015). Bacterial cellulose production from industrial waste and by-product streams. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16(7), 14832–14849. DOI: 10.3390/ijms160714832.
- 20. Hesse, S. & Kondo, T. (2005). Behavior of cellulose production of Acetobacter xylinum in 13C-enriched cultivation media including movements on nematic ordered cellulose templates. Carbohyd. Polym. 60(4), 457–465. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.02.018.
- 21. Koizumi, S., Tomita, Y., Kondo, T. & Hashimoto, T. (2009). What factors determine hierarchical structure of microbial cellulose – interplay among physics, chemistry and biology. Macromol. Symp. 279(1), 110–118. DOI: 10.1002/masy.200950517.
- 22. Ross, P., Weinhouse, H., Aloni, Y., Michaeli, D., Weinberger-Ohana, P., Mayer, R., Braun, S., de Vroom, E., van der Marel, G.A., van Boom, J.H. & Benziman, M. (1987). Regulation of cellulose synthesis in Acetobacter xylinum by cyclic diguanylic acid. Nature 325, 279–281. DOI: 10.1038/325279a0.
- 23. Keshk, S. & Sameshima, K. (2005). Evaluation of different carbon sources for bacterial cellulose production. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 4(6), 478–482. DOI: 10.5897/AJB2005.000-3087.
- 24. Toda, K., Asakura, T., Fukaya, M., Entani, E. & Kawamura, Y. (1997). Cellulose production by acetic acid-resistant Acetobacter xylinum. Ferment. Bioeng. 84(3), 228–231. DOI: 10.1016/S0922-338X(97)82059-4.
- 25. Park, J.K., Hyun, S.H. & Jung, J.Y. (2004). Conversion of G. hansenii PJK into non-cellulose-producing mutants according to the culture condition. Biotechnol. Bioproc. Eng. 9(5), 383–388. DOI: 10.1007/BF02933062.
- 26. Çoban, E.P. & Biyik, H. (2011). Effect of various carbon and nitrogen sources on cellulose synthesis by Acetobacter lovaniensis HBB5. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10(27), 5346–5354. DOI: 10.5897/AJB10.1693.
- 27. Son, H.J., Heo, M.S., Kim, Y.G. & Lee, S.J. (2001). Optimization of fermentation conditions for the production of bacterial cellulose by a newly isolated Acetobacter sp. A9 in shaking cultures. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 33(1), 1–5. DOI: 10.1042/BA20000065.
- 28. Yunoki, S., Osada, Y., Kono, H. & Takai, M. (2004). Role of ethanol in improvement of bacterial cellulose production: analysis using 13C-labeled carbon sources. Food. Sci. Technol. Res. 10(3), 307–313. DOI: 10.3136/fstr.10.307.
- 29. Park, J.K., Jung, J.Y. & Park, Y.H. (2003). Cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter hansenii in a medium containing ethanol. Biotechnol. Lett. 25(24), 2055–2059. DOI: 10.1023/B:BILE.0000007065.63682.18.
- 30. Pa’, E.N., Hamid, N.I.A., Khairuddin, N., Zahan, K.A., Seng, K.F. & Siddique, B.M. (2014). Effect of different drying methods on the morphology, crystallinity, swelling ability and tensile properties of nata de coco. Sains Malaysiana 43(5), 767–773.
- 31. Lin, S.B., Hsu, C.P., Chen, L.C. & Chen, H.H. (2009). Adding enzymatically modified gelatin to enhance the rehydration abilities and mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose. Food Hydrocol. 23(8), 2195–2203. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.05.011.
- 32. Schrecker, S.T. & Gostomski, P.A. (2005). Determining the water holding capacity of microbial cellulose. Biotechnol. Lett. 27(19), 1435–1438. DOI: 10.1007/s10529-005-1465-y.
- 33. Gelin, K., Bodin, A., Gatenholm, P., Mihranyan, A., Edwards, K. & Strømme, M. (2007). Characterization of water in bacterial cellulose using dielectric spectroscopy and electron microscopy. Polymer 48(26), 7623–7631. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.10.039.
- 34. Tang, W., Jia, S., Jia, Y. & Yang, H. (2010). The influence of fermentation conditions and post-treatment methods on porosity of bacterial cellulose membrane. World J. Microb. Biotechnol. 26(1), 125–131. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-009-0151-y.
- 35. Al-Shamary, E.E. & Al-Darwash, A.K. (2013). Influence of fermentation condition and alkali treatment on the porosity and thickness of bacterial cellulose membranes. The Online J. Sci. Technol. 3(2), 194–203.
- 36. Shezad, O., Khan, S., Khan, T. & Park, J.K. (2010). Physico-chemical and mechanical characterization of bacterial cellulose produced with an excellent productivity in static conditions using a simple fed-batch cultivation strategy. Carbohyd. Polym. 82(1), 173–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.052.
- 37. Ougiya, H., Watanabe, K., Matsumura, T. & Yoshinaga. F. (1998). Relationship between suspension properties and fibril structure of disintegrated bacterial cellulose. Biosci. Biotech. Bioch. 62(9), 1714–1719. DOI: 10.1271/bbb.62.1714.
- 38. Shah, N., Ha, J.H. & Park, J.K. (2010). Effect of reactor surface on production of bacterial cellulose and water soluble oligosaccharides by Gluconacetobacter hansenii PJK. Biotechnol. Bioproc. Eng. 15(1), 110–118. DOI: 10.1007/s12257-009-3064-6.
- 39. Tahara, N., Tabuchi, M., Watanabe, K., Yano, H., Morinaga, Y. & Yoshinaga, F. (1997). Degree of polymerization of cellulose from Acetobacter xylinum BPR2001 decreased by cellulase produced by the strain. Biosci. Biotech. Bioch. 61(11), 1862–1865. DOI: 10.1271/bbb.61.1862.
- 40. Liu, Y., Thibodeaux, D., Gamble, G., Bauer, P. & van Derveer, D. (2012). Comparative investigation of Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy and X-ray Diffraction (XRD) in the determination of cotton fiber crystallinity. Appl. Spectrosc. 66(8), 983–986. DOI: 10.1366/12-06611.