Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Morphology and the physical and thermal properties of thermoplastic polyurethane reinforced with thermally reduced graphene oxide Cover

Morphology and the physical and thermal properties of thermoplastic polyurethane reinforced with thermally reduced graphene oxide

Green Sciences
Volume 17 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
By: ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Nov 2015
References

References

  1. 1. Stankovich, S., Dikin, D.A., Dommett G.H.B., Kohlhaas K.M., Zimney E.J. & Stach E.A., et al. (2006). Graphene-based composite materials.442, 282–286. DOI: 10.1038/nature04969.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Ray, S.S. & Okamoto, M. (2003). Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: a review from preparation to processing.28, 1539–1641. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.002.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Leroux, F. & Besse, J.P. (2001). Polymer intercalated layered double hydroxide: a new emerging class of nanocomposites.13, 3507–3515. DOI: 10.1021/cm0110268.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Peng, L., Kim, N.H., Bhadra, S. & Lee, J.H. (2009). Electroresponsive property of novel poly(acrylate-acryloyloxyethyl trimethyl ammoniumchloride)/clay nanocomposite hydrogels.79, 2263–2266. DOI: 10.4028/.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Giannelis, E.P., Krishnamoorti, R. & Manias, E. (1999). Polymer-silicate nanocomposites: model systems for confined polymers and polymer brushes.138, 107–147. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-69711-X_3.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Uddin, F. (2008). Clays, nanoclays, and montmorillonite minerals.39, 2805–2814. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-008-9603-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Zhang, W., Blackburn, R.S. & Dehghani-Sanij, A. (2007). Electrical conductivity of epoxy resin-carbon black-silica nanocomposites: effect of silica concentration and analysis of polymer curing reaction by FTIR.57, 949–952. DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.07.030.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Li, Q., Siddaramaiah, Kim, N.H., Yoo, G.H. & Lee, J.H. (2009). Positive temperature coefficient characteristic and structure of graphite nanofibers reinforced high-density polyethylene/carbon black nanocomposites.40, 218–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.11.002.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Chen, X., Zheng, Y.P., Kang, F. & Shen, W.C. (2006). Preparation and structure analysis of carbon/carbon composite made from phenolic resin impregnation into exfoliated graphite.67, 1141–1144. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2006.01.087.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Liao, S.H., Yen, C.Y., Weng, C.C., Lin, Y.F., Ma, C.C.M. &Yang, C.H., et al. (2008). Preparation and properties of carbon nanotube/polypropylene nanocomposite bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells.185, 1225–1232. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.064.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Liu, N., Luo, F., Wu, H., Liu, Y., Zhang, C. & Chen, J. (2008). One step ionic-liquid-assisted electrochemical synthesis of ionic-liquid-functionalized graphene sheets directly from graphene.18, 1518–1525. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200700797.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Zhu, Y., Murali, S., Cai, W., Li, X., Suk, J.W. & Potts, J.R., et al. (2010). Graphene and graphene oxide: Synthesis, properties, and applications.22, 3906–3924. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201001068.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Si, Y. & Samulski, T. (2008). Synthesis of water soluble graphene.8, 1679–1682. DOI: 10.1021/nl080604h.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Geim, A.K. & MacDonald, A.H. (2007). Graphene: exploring carbon flatland.60(8), 35–34. DOI: 10.1063/1.2774096.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Wang, G., Shen, X., Wang, B., Yao, J. & Park, J. (2009) Synthesis and characterization of hydrophilic and organophilic graphene nanosheets.47, 1359–1364. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.01.027.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Wang, G., Yang, J., Park, J., Gou, X., Wang, B. & Liu, H., et al. (2008). Facile synthesis and characterization of graphene nanosheets.112, 8192–8195. DOI: 10.1021/jp710931h.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Dreyer, R.D., Park, S., Bielawski, C.W. & Ruoff, R.S. (2010). The chemistry of graphene oxide.39, 228–240. DOI: 10.1039/b917103g.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Wang, X., Yang, H., Song, L., Hu, Y., Xing, W. & Lu, H. (2011). Morphology, mechanical and thermal properties ofgraphene-reinforced poly(butylene succinate) nanocomposites.. 72, 1–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.05.007.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Kim, H., Abdala, A.A. & Macosko, C.W. (2010). Graphene/polymer nanocomposites.43, 6515–6530. DOI: 10.1021/ma100572e.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Mya, K.Y., Gose, H.B., Pretsch, T., Bothe, M. & He, C. (2011). Star-shaped POSS-polycaprolactone polyurethanes and their shape memory performance.21, 4827–4836. DOI: 10.1039/C0JM04459H.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Ma, W.S., Wu, L., Yang, F. & Wang, S.F. (2014). Non-covalently modified reduced graphene oxide/polyurethane nanocomposites with good mechanical and thermal properties.49, 562–571. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-013-7736-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Jung, Y.C., Sahoo, N.G. & Cho, J.W. (2006). Polymeric nanocomposites of polyurethane block copolymers and functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes as crosslinkers.27, 126–131. DOI: 10.1002/marc.200500658.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Kim, J.T., Kim, B.K., Kim, E.Y., Park, H.C. & Jeong, H.M. (2014). Synthesis and shape memory performance of polyurethane/graphene nanocomposites.74, 16–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2013.10.004.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Park, J.H. & Kim, B.K. (2014). Infrared light actuated shape memory effects in crystalline polyurethane/graphene chemical hybrids.23, from, DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/23/2/025038.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Bernal, M.M., Martin-Gallego, M., Molenberg, I., Huynen, I., López, M.A. & Verdejo, M.R. (2014). Influence of carbon nanoparticles on the polymerization and EMI shielding properties of PU nanocomposite foams.4, 7911–7918. DOI: 10.1039/C3RA45607B.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Hodlur, R.M. & Rabinal, M.K. (2014). Self assembled graphene layers on polyurethane foam as a highly pressure sensitive conducting composite.90, 160–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.005.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Allen, M.J., Tung, V.C. & Kaner, R.B. (2010). Honeycomb carbon: a review of grapheme.110, 132–145. DOI: 10.1021/cr900070d.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Delebecq, E., Pascault, J.P., Boutevin, B. & Ganachaud, F. (2013). On the versatility of urethane/urea bonds: reversibility, blocked isocyanate, and non-isocyanate polyurethane.113, 80–118. DOI: 10.1021/cr300195n.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Sadasivuni, K.K., Ponnamma, D., Thomas, S. & Grohens, Y. (2014). Evolution from graphite to graphene elastomer composites.39, 749–780. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.08.003.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Huang, X., Qi, X., Boey, F. & Zhang, H. (2012). Graphene-based composites.41, 666–686. DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15078B.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Jung, Y.C., Yoo, H.J., Kim, Y.A., Cho, J.W. & Endo, M. (2010). Electroactive shape memory performance of polyurethane composite having homogeneously dispersed and covalently crosslinked carbon nanotubes,48, 1598–1603. DOI:10.1016/j.carbon.2009.12.058.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Yadav, S.K., Mahapatra, S.S. & Cho, J.W. (2012). Synthesis of mechanically robust antimicrobial nanocomposites by click coupling of hyperbranched polyurethane and carbon nanotubes,53, 2023–2031. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.03.010.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Deka, H., Karak, N., Kalita, R.D. & Buragohain, A.K. (2010). Biocompatible hyperbranched polyurethane/multi-walled carbon nanotube composites as shape memory materials.48, 2013–2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.02.009.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Ma, W.S., Wu, L., Yang, F. & Wang, S.F. (2014). Non-covalently modified reduced graphene oxide/polyurethane nanocomposites with good mechanical and thermal properties.49, 562–571. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-013-7736-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Cai, D., Yusoh, K. & Song, M. (2009). The mechanical properties and morphology of a graphite oxide nanoplatelet/polyurethane composite.20, from. DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/8/085712.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. 36. Bernal, M.M., Molenberg, I., Estravis, S., Rodriguez-Perez, M.A., Huynen, I., Lopez-Manchado, M.A. & Verdejo, R. (2012). Comparing the effect of carbon-based nanofillers on the physical properties of flexible polyurethane foams.47, 5673–5679. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-012-6331-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Mya, K.Y., Gose, H.B., Pretsch, T., Bothe, M. & He, C. (2011). Star-shaped POSS-polycaprolactone polyurethanes and their shape memory performance.21, 4827–4836. DOI: 10.1039/C0JM04459H.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Park, J.H. & Kim, B.K. (2014). Infrared light actuated shape memory effects in crystalline polyurethane/graphene chemical hybrids.23, 1–7. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/23/2/025038.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. 39. Bernal, M.M., Molenberg, I., Estravis, S., Rodriguez-Perez, M.A., Huynen, I., Lopez-Manchado, M.A. & Verdejo, R. (2012). Comparing the effect of carbon-based nanofillers on the physical properties of flexible polyurethane foams.47, 5673–5679. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-012-6331-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. 40. Hodlur, R.M. & Rabinal, M.K. (2014). Self assembled graphene layers on polyurethane foam as a highly pressure sensitive conducting composite.90, 160–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.005.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. 41. Cai, D., Yusoh, K. & Song, M. (2009). The mechanical properties and morphology of a graphite oxide nanoplatelet/polyurethane composite. Nanotechnology 20, from. DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/8/085712.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. 42. Xia, H.S. & Song, M. (2005). Preparation and characterization of polyurethane–carbon nanotube Composites.1(5), 386–394. DOI: 10.1039/b509038e.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. 43. Chattopadhyay, D.K. & Webster, D.C. (2009). Thermal stability and flame retardancy of polyurethanes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 34(10), 1068–1133. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.06.002.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. 44. Thirumal, M., Khastgir, D., Nando, G.B., Naik, Y.P. & Singha, N.K. (2010). Halogen-free flame retardant PUF: effect of melamine compounds on mechanical, thermal and flame retardant properties.95(6), 1138–1145. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.01.035.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pjct-2015-0073 | Journal eISSN: 3072-0389 (formerly 1899-4741) | Journal ISSN: 1509-8117
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 88 - 94
Published on: Nov 27, 2015
Published by: West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
nanocomposites,
graphene,
polyurethane,
carbon nanofillers,
TRG
Related subjects:
Industrial chemistry,
Biotechnology,
Chemical engineering,
Process engineering

© 2015 Michał Strankowski, Łukasz Piszczyk, Paulina Kosmela, Piotr Korzeniewski, published by West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 17 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
Previous article
Next article