Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Morphology and the physical and thermal properties of thermoplastic polyurethane reinforced with thermally reduced graphene oxide Cover

Morphology and the physical and thermal properties of thermoplastic polyurethane reinforced with thermally reduced graphene oxide

Green Sciences
Volume 17 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
By: Michał Strankowski,  Łukasz Piszczyk,  Paulina Kosmela and  Piotr Korzeniewski  
Open Access
|Nov 2015

References

  1. 1. Stankovich, S., Dikin, D.A., Dommett G.H.B., Kohlhaas K.M., Zimney E.J. & Stach E.A., et al. (2006). Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442, 282–286. DOI: 10.1038/nature04969.10.1038/nature04969
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Ray, S.S. & Okamoto, M. (2003). Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: a review from preparation to processing. Prog. Polym. Sci. 28, 1539–1641. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.002.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Leroux, F. & Besse, J.P. (2001). Polymer intercalated layered double hydroxide: a new emerging class of nanocomposites. Chem. Mater. 13, 3507–3515. DOI: 10.1021/cm0110268.10.1021/cm0110268
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Peng, L., Kim, N.H., Bhadra, S. & Lee, J.H. (2009). Electroresponsive property of novel poly(acrylate-acryloyloxyethyl trimethyl ammoniumchloride)/clay nanocomposite hydrogels. Adv. Mater. Res. 79, 2263–2266. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.79-82.2263.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.79-82.2263
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Giannelis, E.P., Krishnamoorti, R. & Manias, E. (1999). Polymer-silicate nanocomposites: model systems for confined polymers and polymer brushes. Adv. Polym. Sci. 138, 107–147. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-69711-X_3.10.1007/3-540-69711-X_3
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Uddin, F. (2008). Clays, nanoclays, and montmorillonite minerals. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 39, 2805–2814. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-008-9603-5.10.1007/s11661-008-9603-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Zhang, W., Blackburn, R.S. & Dehghani-Sanij, A. (2007). Electrical conductivity of epoxy resin-carbon black-silica nanocomposites: effect of silica concentration and analysis of polymer curing reaction by FTIR. Scripta. Mater. 57, 949–952. DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.07.030.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.07.030
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Li, Q., Siddaramaiah, Kim, N.H., Yoo, G.H. & Lee, J.H. (2009). Positive temperature coefficient characteristic and structure of graphite nanofibers reinforced high-density polyethylene/carbon black nanocomposites. Compos. Part B 40, 218–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.11.002.10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.11.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Chen, X., Zheng, Y.P., Kang, F. & Shen, W.C. (2006). Preparation and structure analysis of carbon/carbon composite made from phenolic resin impregnation into exfoliated graphite. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 67, 1141–1144. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2006.01.087.10.1016/j.jpcs.2006.01.087
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Liao, S.H., Yen, C.Y., Weng, C.C., Lin, Y.F., Ma, C.C.M. &Yang, C.H., et al. (2008). Preparation and properties of carbon nanotube/polypropylene nanocomposite bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J. Power. Sources. 185, 1225–1232. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.064.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.064
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Liu, N., Luo, F., Wu, H., Liu, Y., Zhang, C. & Chen, J. (2008). One step ionic-liquid-assisted electrochemical synthesis of ionic-liquid-functionalized graphene sheets directly from graphene. Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 1518–1525. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200700797.10.1002/adfm.200700797
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Zhu, Y., Murali, S., Cai, W., Li, X., Suk, J.W. & Potts, J.R., et al. (2010). Graphene and graphene oxide: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv. Mater. 22, 3906–3924. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201001068.10.1002/adma.201001068
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Si, Y. & Samulski, T. (2008). Synthesis of water soluble graphene. Nano. Lett. 8, 1679–1682. DOI: 10.1021/nl080604h.10.1021/nl080604h
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Geim, A.K. & MacDonald, A.H. (2007). Graphene: exploring carbon flatland. Phys. Today 60(8), 35–34. DOI: 10.1063/1.2774096.10.1063/1.2774096
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Wang, G., Shen, X., Wang, B., Yao, J. & Park, J. (2009) Synthesis and characterization of hydrophilic and organophilic graphene nanosheets. Carbon 47, 1359–1364. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.01.027.10.1016/j.carbon.2009.01.027
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Wang, G., Yang, J., Park, J., Gou, X., Wang, B. & Liu, H., et al. (2008). Facile synthesis and characterization of graphene nanosheets. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 8192–8195. DOI: 10.1021/jp710931h.10.1021/jp710931h
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Dreyer, R.D., Park, S., Bielawski, C.W. & Ruoff, R.S. (2010). The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 228–240. DOI: 10.1039/b917103g.10.1039/B917103G
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Wang, X., Yang, H., Song, L., Hu, Y., Xing, W. & Lu, H. (2011). Morphology, mechanical and thermal properties ofgraphene-reinforced poly(butylene succinate) nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 72, 1–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.05.007.10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.05.007
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Kim, H., Abdala, A.A. & Macosko, C.W. (2010). Graphene/polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules 43, 6515–6530. DOI: 10.1021/ma100572e.10.1021/ma100572e
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Mya, K.Y., Gose, H.B., Pretsch, T., Bothe, M. & He, C. (2011). Star-shaped POSS-polycaprolactone polyurethanes and their shape memory performance. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 4827–4836. DOI: 10.1039/C0JM04459H.10.1039/c0jm04459h
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Ma, W.S., Wu, L., Yang, F. & Wang, S.F. (2014). Non-covalently modified reduced graphene oxide/polyurethane nanocomposites with good mechanical and thermal properties. J. Mater. Sci. 49, 562–571. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-013-7736-4.10.1007/s10853-013-7736-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Jung, Y.C., Sahoo, N.G. & Cho, J.W. (2006). Polymeric nanocomposites of polyurethane block copolymers and functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes as crosslinkers. Macromol Rapid Commun. 27, 126–131. DOI: 10.1002/marc.200500658.10.1002/marc.200500658
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Kim, J.T., Kim, B.K., Kim, E.Y., Park, H.C. & Jeong, H.M. (2014). Synthesis and shape memory performance of polyurethane/graphene nanocomposites. Reac. Func. Polym. 74, 16–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2013.10.004.10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2013.10.004
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Park, J.H. & Kim, B.K. (2014). Infrared light actuated shape memory effects in crystalline polyurethane/graphene chemical hybrids. Smart Mater. Struct. 23, from http://iop-science.iop.org/0964-1726/23/2/025038, DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/23/2/025038.10.1088/0964-1726/23/2/025038
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Bernal, M.M., Martin-Gallego, M., Molenberg, I., Huynen, I., López, M.A. & Verdejo, M.R. (2014). Influence of carbon nanoparticles on the polymerization and EMI shielding properties of PU nanocomposite foams. RSC Adv. 4, 7911–7918. DOI: 10.1039/C3RA45607B.10.1039/c3ra45607b
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Hodlur, R.M. & Rabinal, M.K. (2014). Self assembled graphene layers on polyurethane foam as a highly pressure sensitive conducting composite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 90, 160–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.005.10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Allen, M.J., Tung, V.C. & Kaner, R.B. (2010). Honeycomb carbon: a review of grapheme. Chem. Rev. 110, 132–145. DOI: 10.1021/cr900070d.10.1021/cr900070d
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Delebecq, E., Pascault, J.P., Boutevin, B. & Ganachaud, F. (2013). On the versatility of urethane/urea bonds: reversibility, blocked isocyanate, and non-isocyanate polyurethane. Chem. Rev. 113, 80–118. DOI: 10.1021/cr300195n.10.1021/cr300195n
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Sadasivuni, K.K., Ponnamma, D., Thomas, S. & Grohens, Y. (2014). Evolution from graphite to graphene elastomer composites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 39, 749–780. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.08.003.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.08.003
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Huang, X., Qi, X., Boey, F. & Zhang, H. (2012). Graphene-based composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 666–686. DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15078B.10.1039/C1CS15078B
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Jung, Y.C., Yoo, H.J., Kim, Y.A., Cho, J.W. & Endo, M. (2010). Electroactive shape memory performance of polyurethane composite having homogeneously dispersed and covalently crosslinked carbon nanotubes, Carbon 48, 1598–1603. DOI:10.1016/j.carbon.2009.12.058.10.1016/j.carbon.2009.12.058
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Yadav, S.K., Mahapatra, S.S. & Cho, J.W. (2012). Synthesis of mechanically robust antimicrobial nanocomposites by click coupling of hyperbranched polyurethane and carbon nanotubes, Polymer 53, 2023–2031. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.03.010.10.1016/j.polymer.2012.03.010
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Deka, H., Karak, N., Kalita, R.D. & Buragohain, A.K. (2010). Biocompatible hyperbranched polyurethane/multi-walled carbon nanotube composites as shape memory materials. Carbon 48, 2013–2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.02.009.10.1016/j.carbon.2010.02.009
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Ma, W.S., Wu, L., Yang, F. & Wang, S.F. (2014). Non-covalently modified reduced graphene oxide/polyurethane nanocomposites with good mechanical and thermal properties. J. Mater. Sci. 49, 562–571. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-013-7736-4.10.1007/s10853-013-7736-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Cai, D., Yusoh, K. & Song, M. (2009). The mechanical properties and morphology of a graphite oxide nanoplatelet/polyurethane composite. Nanotechnology 20, from http://iop-science.iop.org/0957-4484/20/8/085712. DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/8/085712.10.1088/0957-4484/20/8/085712
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 36. Bernal, M.M., Molenberg, I., Estravis, S., Rodriguez-Perez, M.A., Huynen, I., Lopez-Manchado, M.A. & Verdejo, R. (2012). Comparing the effect of carbon-based nanofillers on the physical properties of flexible polyurethane foams. J. Mater. Sci. 47, 5673–5679. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-012-6331-4.10.1007/s10853-012-6331-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Mya, K.Y., Gose, H.B., Pretsch, T., Bothe, M. & He, C. (2011). Star-shaped POSS-polycaprolactone polyurethanes and their shape memory performance. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 4827–4836. DOI: 10.1039/C0JM04459H.10.1039/c0jm04459h
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Park, J.H. & Kim, B.K. (2014). Infrared light actuated shape memory effects in crystalline polyurethane/graphene chemical hybrids. Smart Mater. Struct. 23, 1–7. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/23/2/025038.10.1088/0964-1726/23/2/025038
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. 39. Bernal, M.M., Molenberg, I., Estravis, S., Rodriguez-Perez, M.A., Huynen, I., Lopez-Manchado, M.A. & Verdejo, R. (2012). Comparing the effect of carbon-based nanofillers on the physical properties of flexible polyurethane foams. J. Mater. Sci. 47, 5673–5679. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-012-6331-4.10.1007/s10853-012-6331-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. 40. Hodlur, R.M. & Rabinal, M.K. (2014). Self assembled graphene layers on polyurethane foam as a highly pressure sensitive conducting composite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 90, 160–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.005.10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. 41. Cai, D., Yusoh, K. & Song, M. (2009). The mechanical properties and morphology of a graphite oxide nanoplatelet/polyurethane composite. Nanotechnology 20, from http://iopscience.iop.org/0957-4484/20/8/085712. DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/8/085712.10.1088/0957-4484/20/8/085712
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. 42. Xia, H.S. & Song, M. (2005). Preparation and characterization of polyurethane–carbon nanotube Composites. Soft Matter 1(5), 386–394. DOI: 10.1039/b509038e.10.1039/b509038e
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. 43. Chattopadhyay, D.K. & Webster, D.C. (2009). Thermal stability and flame retardancy of polyurethanes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 34(10), 1068–1133. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.06.002.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.06.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. 44. Thirumal, M., Khastgir, D., Nando, G.B., Naik, Y.P. & Singha, N.K. (2010). Halogen-free flame retardant PUF: effect of melamine compounds on mechanical, thermal and flame retardant properties. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 95(6), 1138–1145. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.01.035.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.01.035
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pjct-2015-0073 | Journal eISSN: 3072-0389
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 88 - 94
Published on: Nov 27, 2015
Published by: West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
nanocomposites,
graphene,
polyurethane,
carbon nanofillers,
TRG
Related subjects:
Industrial chemistry,
Biotechnology,
Chemical engineering,
Process engineering

© 2015 Michał Strankowski, Łukasz Piszczyk, Paulina Kosmela, Piotr Korzeniewski, published by West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 17 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)Next article