Precedence permutation patterns creating criticality constellations: Exploring a conjecture on nonlinear activities with continuous links
By:
Gunnar Lucko and Yi Su
References
- Allen, J. F. (1983). Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of ACM, 26(11), pp. 832-843.
- Awwad, R. E., & Ioannou, P. G. (2007). Floats in RSM: Repetitive scheduling method. In: Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress, Grand Bahama Island, The Commonwealth of the Bahamas, May 6-8, 2007, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp. 1133-1140.
- Bokor, O., & Hajdu, M. (2015). Investigation of critical activities in a network with point-to-point relations. Procedia Engineering, 123, pp. 198-207.
- Crandall, K. C. (1973). Project planning with precedence lead/lag factors. Project Management Quarterly, 4(3), PMI-18-PMI-27.
- Fazar, W. (1962). The origin of PERT. The Controller, 1962(December), pp. 598-621.
- Fondahl, J. W. (1962). A Non-Computer Approach to the Critical Path Method for the Construction Industry, 2nd ed., November 1961, Revised 1962, Technical Report No. 9, Prepared under research contract NBy-17798, Bureau of Yards and Docks, U.S. Navy, Distributed by The Construction Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 133 pp.
- Francis, A. (2004). La modélisation chronographique de la planification des projets de construction. Dissertation, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, QC, Canada, 331 pp.
- Hajdu, M. (1997). Network Scheduling Techniques for Construction Project Management. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
- Hajdu, M. (2015a). Continuous precedence relations for better modelling overlapping activities. Procedia Engineering, 123, pp. 216-223.
- Hajdu, M. (2015b). History and some latest developments of precedence diagramming method. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, 7(2), pp. 1302-1314.
- Hajdu, M. (2015c). One relation to rule them all: The point-to-point precedence relation that substitutes the existing ones. In: Proceedings of the CSCE International Construction Specialty Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 8-10, 2015, Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Montréal, QC, Canada, pp. 827-837.
- Hajdu, M. (2016). How many types of critical activities exist? A conjecture that needs a proof. In: Presentation, Creative Construction Conference, Budapest, Hungary, June 25-28, 2016, Diamond Congress, Budapest, Hungary.
- Hajdu, M., Lucko, G., & Su, Y. (2017). Singularity functions for continuous precedence relations and nonlinear activity-time-production functions. Automation in Construction, 79(July), pp. 31-38.
- Hajdu, M., Skibniewski, M. J., Vanhoucke, M., Horvath, A., & Brilakis, I. (2016). How many types of critical activities exist? A conjecture that needs a proof.” Procedia Engineering, 164, pp. 3-11.
- Harmelink, D. J. (2001). Linear scheduling model: Float characteristics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(4), pp. 255-260.
- Harris, R. B. (1978). Precedence and Arrow Networking Techniques for Construction. John Wiley and Sons, New York City, NY.
- IBM. (1964). User’s Manual for IBM 1440 Project Control System (PCS). International Business Machines, Armonk, NY.
- Kallantzis, A., & Lambropoulos, S. (2004). Critical path determination by incorporation minimum and maximum time and distance constraints into linear scheduling. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11(3), pp. 211-222.
- Kelley, J. W., & Walker, M. R. (1959). Critical path planning and scheduling. In: Proceedings of the Eastern Joint Computer Conference, Boston, MA, December 1-3, 1959, National Joint Computer Committee, Association for Computing Machinery, New York City, NY, 16, pp. 160-173.
- Kelley, J. W., & Walker, M. R. (1989). The origins of CPM: A personal history. pmNetwork, 3(2), pp. 7-22.
- Kim, S.-Y. (2012). CPM schedule summarizing function of the beeline diagramming method. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 11(2), pp. 367-374.
- Lucko, G. (2008). Analysis of linear schedules with singularity functions versus critical path method. In: Presented at PMI College of Scheduling Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, May 4-7, 2008, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA, 12 pp.
- Lucko, G. (2009). Productivity scheduling method: Linear schedule analysis with singularity functions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(4), pp. 246-253.
- Lucko, G., & Gattei, G. (2016). Line-of-balance against linear scheduling: Critical comparison. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law, 169(1), pp. 26-44.
- Lucko, G., & Peña Orozco, A. A. (2009). Float types in linear schedule analysis with singularity functions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(5), pp. 368-377
- Mauchly, J. W. (1962). Critical-path scheduling. Chemical Engineering, April 16, pp. 139-154.
- Mubarak, S. A. (2015). Construction Project Scheduling and Control, 3rd edn. Pearson/Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
- Plotnick, F. L. (2006). RDM - relationship diagramming method. In: Transactions of the AACE Annual Meeting, Last Vegas, NV, June 19-22, 2006, Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International, Morgantown, WV, PS.08.1- PS.08.10.
- Ponce de Leon, G. (2008). Graphical planning method (A new network-based planning/scheduling paradigm). In: Presented at PMI College of Scheduling Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, May 4-7, 2008, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA, 10 pp.
- Reis, J. S., & Lucko, G. (2016). Productivity scheduling method with maximum constraints. International Journal of Construction Management, 16(1), pp. 77-93.
- Rösch, W. (1970). Roy-Typ und Fondahl-Typ: Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Tätigkeitsgraphen in Bauwesen. Dissertation, Technical University Carolo-Wilhelmina of Brunswick, Brunswick, Germany, 144 pp.
- Roy, G. B. (1959). Contribution de la théorie des graphes á l’étude de certains problémes linéaries. Comptes Rendus de Séance de l’Académie des Sciences, 248(April 27, 1959), pp. 2437-2439.
- Wiest, J. D. (1981). Precedence diagramming method: Some unusual characteristics and their implications for project managers. Journal of Operations Management, 1(3), pp. 121-130.
Language: English
Page range: 1674 - 1683
Submitted on: Aug 31, 2017
Accepted on: Nov 23, 2017
Published on: Feb 17, 2018
Published by: University of Zagreb
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2018 Gunnar Lucko, Yi Su, published by University of Zagreb
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.