Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Bioindication on the basis of benthic diatoms: Advantages and disadvantages of the Polish phytobenthos lake assessment method (IOJ – the Diatom Index for Lakes) / Bioindykacja na podstawie okrzemek bentosowych: Mocne i słabe strony polskiej metody oceny jezior na podstawie fitobentosu (IOJ – Indeks Okrzemkowy Jezior)

Environmental Protection and Natural Resources
Volume 26 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
By:
Open Access
|Dec 2015

References

  1. ÁCS É., RESKÓNÉ N.M., SZABÓ K., TABA G., KISS K.T. 2005. Application of epiphytic diatoms in water quality monitoring of lake Velence - recommendations and assignments. Acta Botanica Hungarica 47: 211-223.10.1556/ABot.47.2005.3-4.1
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. BENNION H., KELLY M.G., JUGGINS S., YALLOP M.L., BURGESS A., JAMIESON J., KROKOWSKI J. 2014. Assessment of ecological status in UK lakes using benthic diatoms. Freshwater Science 33: 639-654.10.1086/675447
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. BIRK S., STRACKBEIN J., HERING D. 2010. WISER methods database. Version: March 2011. Available at: www.wiser.eu/results/method-database [April 2015].
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. BLANCO S., ECTOR L., BÉCARES E. 2004. Epiphytic Diatoms As Water Quality Indicators In Spanish Shallow Lakes. Vie Milieu 54: 71-79.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. BRIX H. 1999. Genetic diversity, ecophysiology and growth dynamics of reed (Phragmites australis). Aquatic Botany 64: 179-184.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. BROWN S-D., AUSTIN A.P. 1973. Diatom Succession and Interaction in Littoral Periphyton and Plankton. Hydrobiologia 43: 333-356.10.1007/BF00015355
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. CANTONATI M., LOWE R.L. 2014. Lake benthic algae: toward an understanding of their ecology. Freshwater Science 33: 475-486.10.1086/676140
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. CASTENHOLZ R.W. 1960. Seasonal changes in the attached algae of freshwater and saline lakes in the Lower Grand Coulee, Washington. Limnology and Oceanography 5: 1-28.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. CATTANEO A., GALANTI G., GENTINETTA S., ROMO S. 1998. Epiphytic algae and macroinvertebrates on submerged and floating-leaved macrophytes in an Italian lake. Freshwater Biology 39: 725-740.10.1046/j.1365-2427.1998.00325.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. CIECIERSKA H., KOLADA A. 2014. ESMI: a macrophyte index for assessing the ecological status of lakes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 186: 5501-5517.10.1007/s10661-014-3799-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. CLEVERING O.A., LISSNER J. 1999. Taxonomy, chromosome numbers, clonal diversity and population dynamics of Phragmites australis. Aquatic Botany 64: 185-208.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. DANILOV R.A., EKELUND N.G.A. 2000. The use of epiphyton and epilithon data as a base for calculating ecological indices in monitoring of eutrophication in lakes in central Sweden. The Science of the Total Environment 248: 63-70.10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00363-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. DENICOLA D.M., KELLY M. 2014. Role of periphyton in ecological assessment of lakes. Freshwater Science 33: 619-638. 10.1086/676117
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L 327/1 of 22.12.2000, 72 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. EMINSON D., MOSS B. 1980. The composition and ecology of periphyton communities in freshwaters. British Phycological Journal 15: 429-446.10.1080/00071618000650431
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. EUROPEAN COMMISSION 2003. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance Document No 7. Monitoring under the Water Framework Directive. Produced by Working Group 2.7 - Monitoring, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of European Communities, 160 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. HILLBRICHT-ILKOWSKA A. 1997. Ekologiczne problemy gospodarowania jakością wód powierzchniowych oraz ich siedliskiem i przyrodą (The ecological problems of the management of quality of surface waters and their habitat and nature). In: Starkel L. (ed.) Użytkowanie a ochrona zasobów wód powierzchniowych w Polsce (The Use and Protection of Surface Water Resources in Poland - in Polish). Polish Academy of Sciences. Zeszyty Naukowe Komitetu “Człowiek i Środowisko” (Journal of the “Man and Environment” Committee) 17: 63-88.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. HOAGLAND K.D., PETERSON C.G. 1990. Effects of light and wave disturbance on vertical zonation of attached microalgae in large reservoir. Journal of Phycology 26: 450-457.10.1111/j.0022-3646.1990.00450.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. HUTOROWICZ A., PASZTALENIEC A. 2014. Phytoplankton metric of ecological status assessment for Polish lakes and its performance along nutrient gradients. Polish Journal of Ecology 62: 525-542.10.3161/104.062.0312
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. KAROSIENĖ J., KASPEROVIČIENĖ J. 2008. Seasonal succession of epiphyton algal communities on Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Stend. in a mesoeutrophic lake. Ekologija 54: 32-39.10.2478/V10055-008-0007-z
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. KAROSIENĖ J., PASKAUSKAS R. 2012. Spatial variability of epiphyton communities structure in a temperate estuarine lagoon. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 114: 100-104.10.1016/j.ecss.2011.08.017
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. KAWECKA B., ELORANTA P.V. 1994. Zarys ekologii glonów wód słodkich i środowisk lądowych (An Outline of the Ecology of Algae of Freshwaters and Terrestrial Environments - in Polish). PWN Scientific Publishers, Warsaw 252 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. KELLY M. 2013. Data rich, information poor? Phytobenthos assessment and the Water Framework Directive. European Journal of Phycology 48: 437-450.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. KELLY M., URBANIC G., ÁCS É., BENNION H., BERTRIN V., BURGESS A., DENYS L., GOTTSCHALK S., KAHLERT M., KARJALAINEN S.M., KENNEDY B., KOSI G., MARCHETTO A., MORIN S., PICIŃSKA-FAŁTYNOWICZ J., POIKANE S., ROSEBERY J., SCHOENFELDER I., SCHOENFELDER J., VARBIRO G. 2014. Comparing aspirations: intercalibration of ecological status concepts across European lakes for littoral diatoms. Hydrobiologia 734: 125-141.10.1007/s10750-014-1874-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. KING L., BARKER P., JONES R.I. 2000. Epilithic algal communities and their relationship to environmental variables in lakes of the English Lake District. Freshwater Biology 45: 425-442.10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00633.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. KING L., CLARKE G., BENNION H., KELLY M., YALLOP M. 2006. Recommendations for sampling littoral diatoms in lakes for ecological status assessments. Journal of Applied Phycology 18: 15-25.10.1007/s10811-005-9009-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. KITNER M., POULÍČKOVÁ A. 2003. Littoral diatoms as indicators for the eutrophication of shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia 506-509: 519-524.10.1023/B:HYDR.0000008567.99066.92
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. KUDELSKA D., SOSZKA H., CYDZIK D. 1997. Ekosystemowe podejście do oceny jakości jezior w Polsce (An ecosystembased approach to the lake quality assessment in Poland - in Polish). Ochrona Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych 11: 85-92.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. LAMBERT D., CATTANEO A., CARIGNAN R. 2008. Periphyton as an early indicator of perturbation in recreational lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 65: 258-265.10.1139/f07-168
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. LAUGASTE R., REUNANEN M. 2005. The composition and density of epiphyton on some macrophyte species in the partly meromictic Lake Verevi. Hydrobiologia 547: 137-150.10.1007/s10750-005-4155-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. MÜLLER U. 1999. The vertical zonation of adpressed diatoms and other epiphytic algae on Phragmites australis. European Journal of Phycology 34: 487-496.10.1080/09541449910001718841
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. PEŁECHATY M. 2004. Can Reed Stands Be Good Indicators of Environmental Conditions of the Lake Littoral? A Synecological Investigation of Phragmites australis - Dominated Phytocoenoses. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 13: 177-183.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. PICIŃSKA-FAŁTYNOWICZ J., BŁACHUTA J. 2010. Wytyczne metodyczne do przeprowadzenia oceny stanu ekologicznego jednolitych części wód rzek i jezior oraz potencjału ekologicznego sztucznych i silnie zmienionych jednolitych części wód płynących Polski na podstawie badań fitobentosu (Methodological guidelines for assessing the ecological status of bodies of rivers and lakes and the ecological potential of artificial and heavily modified bodies of running waters in Poland on the basis of phytobenthos surveys - in Polish). Chief Inspectorate for Environmental Protection, Wrocław 79 pp. http://www.gios.gov.pl/zalaczniki/artykuly/FB_2010.pdf [April 2015].
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. PICIŃSKA-FAŁTYNOWICZ J. 2011. Fitobentos (Phytobenthos). In: Soszka H. (ed.) Ocena stanu ekologicznego wód zlewni rzeki Wel (An assessment of the ecological status of waters in the Wel River catchment - in Polish). Inland Fisheries Institute, Olsztyn pp. 187-201.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. POIKANE S. (ed.) 2014. Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report: Lake Phytobenthos ecological assessment methods. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 978-92-79-35468-7, 140 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. POULÍČKOVÁ A., DUCHOSLAV M., DOKULIL M. 2004. Littoral diatom assemblages as bioindicators of lake trophic status: A case study from perialpine lakes in Austria. European Journal of Phycology 39: 143-152.10.1080/0967026042000201876
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. ROSENBERGER E., HAMPTON S.E., FRADKIN S.C., KENNEDY B.P. 2008. Effects of shoreline development on the nearshore environment in large deep oligotrophic lakes. Freshwater Biology 53: 1673-1691.10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.01990.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. SCHAUMBURG J., SCHRANZ C., STELZER D., HOFMANN G. 2007. Action Instructions for the ecological Evaluation of Lakes for Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive: Macrophytes and Phytobenthos. Bavarian Water Management Agency. München 69 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. SCHNEIDER S.C., ŁAWNICZAK A.E., PICIŃSKA-FAŁTYNOWICZ J., SZOSZKIEWICZ K. 2012. Do macrophytes, diatoms and nondiatom benthic algae give redundant information? Results from a case study in Poland. Limnologica 42: 204-211.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. SHORTREED K.S., COSTELLA A.C., STOCKNER J.G. 1983. Periphyton biomass and species composition in 21 British Columbia lakes: seasonal abundance and response to wholelake nutrient additions. Canadian Journal of Botany. 62: 1022-1031.10.1139/b84-141
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. SPITALE D., SCALFI A., LANGE-BERTALOT H., CANTONATI M. 2011. Using different epilithic-diatom assemblage metrics for an ecological characterization of the shores of Lake Garda. Journal of Limnology 70: 197-208.10.4081/jlimnol.2011.197
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. SOSZKA H. 2002. Ocena i klasyfikacja wód powierzchniowych - ewolucja podejścia do zagadnienia [Assessment and classification of surface waters - an evolution of the approach to the issue - in Polish]. Ochrona Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych 23/24: 33-46.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. STENGER-KOVÁCS C., BUCZKÓ K., HAJNAL E., PADISÁK J. 2007. Epiphytic, littoral diatoms as bioindicators of shallow lake trophic status: Trophic Diatom Index for Lakes (TDIL) developed in Hungary. Hydrobiologia 589:141-154.10.1007/s10750-007-0729-z
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. THOMAS K.E., KLUKE A., HALL R.I., PATERSON A.M., WINTER J.G. 2011. Assessment of benthic algal biomonitoring protocols to evaluate effects of shoreline development on the nearshore zone of Precambrian Shield lakes in Ontario. Lake and Reservoir Management 27: 398-413.10.1080/07438141.2011.633307
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. VLAAMSE MILIEUMAATSCHAPPIJ 2009. Biological assessment of the natural, heavily modified and artificial surface water bodies in Flanders according to the European Water Framework Directive. Erembodegem, Belgium 76 pp. Manuscript.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. ZĘBEK E., BONAR A., SZYMAŃSKA U. 2012. Periphytic diatom communities in the littoral zone of the urban lake Jeziorak Mały (Masurian Lake District, Poland). Ekológia (Bratislava) 31: 105-123. 10.4149/ekol_2012_01_105
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/oszn-2015-0027 | Journal eISSN: 2353-8589 | Journal ISSN: 1230-7831
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 48 - 55
Published on: Dec 30, 2015
Published by: National Research Institute, Institute of Environmental Protection
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
biological monitoring,
phytobenthos,
diatom indices,
Water Framework Directive
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2015 Aleksandra Bielczyńska, published by National Research Institute, Institute of Environmental Protection
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)Next article