Figure 1
Location of the sampling stations in the Gulf of Gdańsk
Figure 2
Water temperature at station J23 in 2010-2012
Figure 3
Water salinity at station J23 in 2010-2012
Figure 4
Abundance variability with SD for Copepoda in 2010-2012
Figure 5
Biomass variability with SD for Copepoda in 2010-2012
Figure 6
Biomass variability with SD for Acartia spp., Temora longicomis and Pseudocalanus sp. in 2010-2012
Figure 7
Proportion of respective developmental stages of Acartia spp. at station J23 in 2010-2012
Table 1
Values of the Pearson correlation coefficient for the temperature and abundance of the development stages of Acartia spp., Temora longicornis and Pseudocalanus sp. (*bold - p<0.05)
| N | CI | CII | CIII | CIV | CV | Female | Male | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acartia spp. | 0.38* | 0.36* | 0.23* | 0.18* | 0.16* | 0.14 | 0.25* | 0.23* |
| Temora longicornis | 0.20* | 0.05 | -0.02 | -0.03 | -0.02 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.18* |
| Pseudocalanus sp. | -0.35 | -0.30 | -0.45* | -0.52* | -0.48* | -0.37 | -0.35 | -0.46* |
Figure 8
Proportion of respective developmental stages of Temora longicornis at station J23 in 2010-2012
Figure 9
Proportion of respective developmental stages of Pseudocalanus sp. at station J23 in 2010-2012
Figure 10
WMD values of Acartia spp., Temora longicornis and Pseudocalanus sp. in 2010-2012
Table 2
Values of the Pearson correlation coefficient for the temperature and production rates of the development stages of Acartia spp., Temora longicornis and Pseudocalanus sp. (*bold - p<0.05)
| N | CI | CII | CIII | CIV | CV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acartia spp. | -0.76* | 0.84* | 0.80* | 0.84* | 0.78* | 0.81* |
| Temora longicornis | -0.87* | 0.34 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.23 | 0.29 |
| Pseudocalanus sp. | -0.22 | 0.18 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.30 | -0.56 |
Figure 11
Secondary production of Acartia spp., Temora longicornis and Pseudocalanus sp. in 2010-2012