References
- 1. European Communities. (2006). European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. 4th ed. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
- 2. European Communities. (2013). European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition Supplements. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
- 3. Young, K. C., Cook, J. J. H., & Oduko, J. M. (2006). Comparison of software and human observers in reading images of the CDMAM test object to assess digital mammography systems. In M. J. Flynn, & J. Hsieh (Eds.), Medical Imaging 2006: Physics of medical imaging. Proceedings of SPIE (vol. 6142), 614206-7.614206. DOI: 10.1117/12.653296.
- 4. de las Heras, H., Schöfer, F., & Tiller, B. (2013). A phantom using titanium and Landolt rings for image quality evaluation in mammography. Phys. Med. Biol., 58(8), L17–L30. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/8/L17.
- 5. BMU. (2012). Development of procedures for non-destructive quality control of phantoms that are used in quality assurance tests according to §16, paragraphs 2 and 3 of the German x-ray ordinance at x-ray systems used for examination of humans UFO-Plan Vorhaben 3608S20001. German Ministry for Environment, Nature Protection and Reactor Security. Braunschweig: PTB. (in German). Available from http://doris.bfs.de/jspui/handle/urn:nbn:de:0221-2012111310226/.
- 6. van der Burght, R., Thijssen, M., & Bijkerk, R. (2010) Manual contrast – detail phantom CDMAM type 3.4. The Netherlands: Artinis Medical Systems BV.
- 7. Young, K. C., Alsager, A., & Oduko, J. M. (2008). Evaluation of software for reading images of the CDMAM test object to assess digital mammography systems. In K. C. Young, A. Alsager, J. M. Oduko, H. Bosmans, B. Verbrugge, T. Geertse, & R. van Engen (Eds.), Medical Imaging 2008: Physics of medical imaging. Proceedings of SPIE (vol. 69131C). DOI: 10.1117/12.770571.
- 8. Van Metter, R., Heath, M., & Fletcher-Heath, L. (2006). Applying the European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening threshold contrast visibility assessment to digital systems. In M. J. Flynn, & J. Hsieh (Eds.), Medical Imaging 2006: Physics of medical imaging. Proceedings of SPIE (vol. 6142), 614205. DOI: 10.1117/12.650141.
- 9. Karssemeijer, N., & Thijssen, M. A. O. (1996). Determination of contrast-detail curves of mammography systems by automated image analysis. In K. Doi, M. L. Giger, & R. M. Nishikawa (Eds.), Digital mammography (pp. 155–160). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
- 10. Visser, R., & Karssemeijer, N. (2011). CDCOM Manual: software for automated readout of CDMAM 3.4 images. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Radboud University.
- 11. Klein, S. A. (2001). Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary. Percept. Psychophys., 63(8), 1421–1455. DOI: 10.3758/BF03194552.
- 12. Young, K. C., Brookes, E., Hudson, W., & Halling-Brown, M. D. (2012). CDMAM Analyser: Software and instruction manual for automated determination of threshold contrast. Version 1.5.5. Guildford: National Co-ordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography.
- 13. Kacker, N. R., Kessel, R., & Sommer, K. (2010). Assessing differences between results determined according to the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., 115(6), 453–459. DOI: 10.6028/jres.115.031.