References
- 1. Diaz Maurin, F. (2011). Fukushima: Consequences of systemic problems in nuclear plant design. Economic & Political Weekly (Mumbai), 46(13), 10-12. http://epw.in/epw/uploads/articles/15865.pdf.
- 2. International Commission on Radiological Protection. (2009). Application of the Commission’s recommendations for the protection of people in emergency exposure situations. (ICRP Publication 109). Ann. ICRP, 39(1).
- 3. Working Group Special Committee on Nuclear Disaster. (2012). Interim report for reviewing. Regulatory guide: Emergency preparedness for nuclear facilities, nuclear safety commission emergency preparedness guidelines.
- 4. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2012, March). RASCAL 4: Description of models and methods. Washington, DC: Offi ce of Nuclear Security and Incident Response. (20555-0001).
- 5. A European manual. (2002). Off-site emergency planning and response to nuclear accidents.
- 6. International Commission on Radiological Protection. (1991). Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. (Publication 60). Oxford: Pergamom Press.
- 7. Jensen, P. H. (2012). Justification, optimization and decision - aiding in existing exposure situations. Section of Applied Health Physics, Risø National Laboratory, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
- 8. International Atomic Energy Agency. (1996). International basic safety standards for protection against radiation and for the safety of radiation sources. Vienna: IAEA. (Safety Series No. 115).
- 9. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2002, January). Modeling potential reactor accident consequences. (NUREG/BR-0359).
- 10. International Atomic Energy Agency. (1997). Generic assessment procedures for determining protective actions during a reactor accident. Vienna: IAEA. (IAEA-TECDOC-955).
- 11. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2002). Safety requirements in emergency preparedness and response. Vienna: IAEA. (IAEA-SR-GS-R-2).