Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Growth-Enhancing Corporate Tax Reform in Belgium Cover

Growth-Enhancing Corporate Tax Reform in Belgium

Open Access
|Jun 2018

References

  1. Abadie, A., A. Diamond, and J. Hainmueller, 2010, Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program, Journal of the American Statistical Association 105 (490), 493–505.10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746
  2. Aus dem Moore, Nils, 2014, Corporate Taxation and Investment: Evidence from the Belgian ACE Reform, Ruhr Economic Papers 534.
  3. Brekke, K., Garcia Pieres, A., Schindler, D., and Schjelderup, G., 2017, Capital taxation and imperfect competition: ACE vs. CBIT, Journal of Public Economics 147, 1-15.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.12.010
  4. Boadway R. and N. Bruce, 1984, A General Proposition on the Design of a Neutral Business Tax, Journal of Public Economics 24, 231–39.10.1016/0047-2727(84)90026-4
  5. Bond, S.R. and M.P. Devereux, 1995, On the Design of a Neutral Business Tax Under Uncertainty, Journal of Public Economics 58, 57–71.10.1016/0047-2727(94)01471-Y
  6. Burggraeve, K., Ph. Jeanfils, K. van Cauter, and L. van Meensel, 2008, Macroeconomic and Fiscal Impact of the Risk Capital Allowance, National Bank of Belgium, Economic Review.
  7. De Mooij, R., and M.P. Devereux, 2011, An Applied Analysis of ACE and CBIT. Reforms in the EU, International Tax and Public Finance 18, 93–120.10.1007/s10797-010-9138-8
  8. De Mooij, R. A., and Gaetan Nicodeme, 2008, Corporate Tax Policy and Incorporation in the EU, International Tax and Public Finance 15, 478–98.10.1007/s10797-008-9072-1
  9. De Mooij, R.A., and I. Saito, 2014, Japan’s Corporate Income Tax: Facts, Issues and Reform Options, IMF Working Paper 14/138.
  10. Dharmapala, D., 2014, What do we Know About Base Erosion and Profit Shifting? A Review of the Empirical Literature, Fiscal Studies 35, 421-448.10.1111/j.1475-5890.2014.12037.x
  11. Dreßler, D. and M. Overesch, 2013, Investment Impact of Tax Loss Treatment – Empirical Insights from a Panel of Multinationals, International Tax and Public Finance 20, 513–543.10.1007/s10797-012-9240-1
  12. Dumont, M., 2015, Evaluation of federal tax incentives for private R&D in Belgium: An update, Federal Planning Bureau Working Paper 5–15.
  13. Duprez, C., and Van Nieuwenhuyze, C., 2016, Belgium Inward and Outward Foreign Direct Investment, National Bank of Belgium Economic Review, Brussels.
  14. European Commission, 2016, Taxation Trends in the European Union.
  15. Federal Public Service Finance, 2016, Federal Tax Expenditures Report.
  16. Fuest, C., Peichl, A., and Siegloch, S, 2015, Do Higher Corporate Taxes Reduce Wages? IZA Discussion Paper No. 9606.
  17. Hebous, S., and Ruf, M., 2017, Evaluating the Effects of ACE Systems on Multinational Debt Financing and Investment, Journal of Public Economics 156, 131-149.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.02.011
  18. Heckemeyer, J. and M. Overesch, 2013, Multinational Profit Response to Tax Differentials: Effect Size and Shifting Channels, ZEW Discussion Paper 13–045.
  19. High Council of Finance, 2014, Een Tax Shifting Ten Voordele van Arbeid en Bredere Belastinggrondslagen, August.
  20. High Councilof Finance, 2016, Advies: Devennootschapsbelastingin een “Post-BEPS” omgeving, July.
  21. International Monetary Fund, 2014, Spillovers in International Corporate Taxation, IMF Policy Paper, May 2014.
  22. International Monetary Fund, 2015, Toward a Growth-Friendly Fiscal Consolidation in Belgium, Selected Issues, February.
  23. International Monetary Fund, 2016a, Tax Policy, Leverage and Macroeconomic Stability, IMF Policy Paper, October.
  24. International Monetary Fund, 2016b, Fiscal Policies for Innovation and Growth, Fiscal Monitor, April.
  25. Kawano, L. and J. Slemrod, 2016, How do Corporate Tax Bases Change when Corporate Tax Rates Change? With Implications for the Tax Rate Elasticity of Corporate Tax Revenues, International Tax and Public Finance 23, 401–433.10.1007/s10797-015-9375-y
  26. Keen, M., 2001, Preferential Regimes Can Make Tax Competition Less Harmful, National Tax Journal 54, 757-62.10.17310/ntj.2001.4.04
  27. Kerste, M., B. Baarsma, J. Weda, N. Rosenboom, W. Rougoor, 2013, Uit de schaduw van het bankwezen (in Dutch), Stichting voor Economisch Onderzoek (SEO), University of Amsterdam.
  28. Kestens, K., P. Van Cauwenberge and J. Christiaens, 2012, The Effect of the Notional Interest Deduction on the Capital Structure of Belgian SMEs, Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy 30, 228–24710.1068/c1163b
  29. Mirrlees, J., Adam, S., Besley, T., Blundell, R., Bond, S., Chote, R., Gammie, M., Johnson, P., Myles, G., and Poterba, J., 2011, Tax by Design: The Mirrlees Review, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  30. Panier, F., F. Perz-Gonzalez and P. Villanueva, 2015, “Capital Structure and Taxes: What Happens when you (also) Subsidize Equity?”, Paper presented at the Bank of International Settlements.
  31. Princen, S., 2012, Taxes Do Affect Corporate Financing Decisions: The Case of Belgian ACE, CESifo Working Paper No. 3713. Munich.
  32. Schepens, G., 2016, Taxes and Bank Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics 120, 585–600.10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.01.015
  33. Zangari, E., 2014, Addressing the Debt Bias: A Comparison between the Belgian and the Italian ACE Systems, European Commission Working Paper N.44 – 2014, Brussels.
  34. Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), 2016, Effective Tax Rates in an Enlarged European Union, Study for the European Commission.
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 17
Submitted on: Mar 16, 2017
Accepted on: Jan 29, 2018
Published on: Jun 2, 2018
Published by: DJØF Publishing, Nordic Tax Research Council
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:

© 2018 Ruud De Mooij, Shafik Hebous, Milena Hrdinkova, published by DJØF Publishing, Nordic Tax Research Council
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.