References
- Agnarsdóttir, Fjóla and Rakel Jensdóttir. 2014. “Corporate taxation in Iceland and the international challenge.” Nordic Tax Journal (2), 149–72.
- Aigner, Hans-Jörgen, Ulrich Scheurle, and Markus Stefaner. 2004. “General Report.” In CFC Legislation, Tax Treaties and EC Law, edited by Michael Lang, Hans-JörgenAigner, Ulrich Scheurle, and Markus Stefaner, 13–52. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
- Arnold, Brian. 1986. The Taxation of Controlled Foreign Corporations – An International Comparison. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.
- Arnold, Brian and Patrick Dibout. 2001. “General Report.” In Cahiers de droit fiscal international 86b, edited by International Fiscal Association, 21–89. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
- Avi-Yonah, Reuven. 2005. “All of a Piece Throughout – The Four Ages of U.S. International Taxation.“ Virginia Tax Review (2), 313–38.
- Barenfield, Jesper and Roger Österman. 2008. “De nya CFC-reglerne – en kommentar.” Svensk Skattetidning (2), 105–8.
- Blanluet, Gauthier and Phillippe J. Durand. 2011. “General Report.” In Cahiers de droit fiscal international 96b, edited by International Fiscal Association, 17-58. The Hague: SDU Uitgivers.
- Bogdan, Michael. 2013. Concise Introduction to Comparative Law. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.
- Brauner, Yariv. 2014. “BEPS: An Interim Evaluation.” World Tax Journal 6 (1), 10–39.
- Broe, Luc de. 2008. International Tax Planning and Prevention of Abuse. Amsterdam: IBFD.
- Bundgaard, Jakob. 2007. “Skattearbitrage & Korrespondensprincip – Omkvalificering af gæld til egenkapital ved udenlandsk skattefrihed af afkast fra hybride finansielle instrumenter.” SkatUdland (207), 556–69.
- Dahlberg, Mattias and Bertil Wiman. 2013. “General Report.” In Cahiers de droit fiscal international 98a, 17–56. The Hague: SDU Uitgivers.
- Dahlberg, Mattias. 2012. InternationellBeskattning. Lund: Studenterlitteratur.
- Dahlberg, Mattias. 2008. ”Regeringsrättenoch de folkrättsligaskatteavtalan.” Skattenytt (7/8), 482–89.
- Dahlberg, Mattias. 2000. Svensk skatteavtalspolitikochutlandskebasbolag. Uppsala: IustusFörlag.
- Dourado, Ana Paula. 2015. “The Role of CFC Rules in the BEPS Initiative and in the EU.” British Tax Review(3), 340–63.
- Farstad, Snorre. 2010. “Er tilknytningskravet etter sktl. § 2-38 tredje eller femte led strengere enn tilknytningskravet i EØS-avtalens regler om etbleringsrett? – Forholdet mellem EF-domstolens avgjørelser i Aberdeen og Cadbury Schweppes.” Skatteret (2), 157–77.
- Folkvord, Benn. 2016. “Kommentar til Høyesteretts dom af 15. mars 2016 (enstemmig) – Den Norske Amerikalinje – Lavskatteland: Ingen vektet vurdering ved sammenligning av lands skattenivå.” www.retsdata.no. Accessed 7 June 2016.
- Folkvord, Benn and Michael Riis. 2014. “Corporate income tax and the international challenge.” Nordic Tax Journal (2), 55–87.
- Garfunkel, Nicholas. 2010. “Are all CFC-regimes the Same? The impact of the Attribution Method.” Tax Notes International 59 (1): 53– 74.
- Gerson, Anna. 2013. “Sweden.” In Cahiers de droit fiscal international 98a, edited by International Fiscal Association, 703–22. The Hague: SDU Uitgivers.
- Gjems-Onstad, Ole, SanazOrmaz Ferdowsi, Benn Folkvord, and Eivind Furuseth. 2015. Norsk Bedriftsskatteret. Oslo: Gyldendal Juridisk.
- Graetz, Michael. 2001. “Inadequate Principles, Outdated Concepts and Unsatisfactory Policies.” Tax Law Review 25, 261–336.
- Gudmundsson, Bogi and Páll Jóhannesson. 2010. “Compatibility of the Icelandic CFC Rule with the EEA Freedoms.” European Taxation 50 (12), 535–44.
- Hansen, Anders Oreby and Poul Erik Lytken. 2012. ”CFC-regler på tynd is?”. SkatUdland (141), 252–61.
- Haslehner, Werner. 2016. The Commission Proposal for an Anti-BEPS Directive: Some Preliminary Comments. http://www.kluwertaxblog.com/2016/02/05/the-commissionproposal-for-an-anti-beps-directive-some-preliminarycomments/ Kluwer. Accessed 5 February 2016.
- Helminen, Marjaana. 2015. “EU Tax Law – Direct Taxation (electronic version).” Amsterdam: IBFD.
- Helminen, Marjaana. 2011. “Better Late Than Never – The Finnish CFC Case and the Requirement to Repeal Finnish Decisions That Conflict with EU Law.” European Taxation 51 (7), 314–18.
- Helminen, Marjaana. 2009. “Amendments to Finland’s CFC-regime.” Bulletin for International Taxation 63 (4), 163–5.
- Helminen, Marjaana. 2004. “National Report Finland.” In CFC Legislation, Tax Treaties and EC Law, edited by Michael Lang, Hans-JörgenAigner, Ulrich Scheurle, and Markus Stefaner, 204-12. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
- Hilling, Maria. 2013. “Justifcations and Proportionality: An Analysis of the ECJ’s Assessment of National Rules for the Prevention of Tax Avoidance.” Intertax 41 (5), 294–307.
- Hilling, Maria. 2008. ”The Swedish Supreme Administrative Court Totally Disregards Tax Treaty: A Critical Analysis of a CFC Judgment.” Intertax 36 (10), 455–61.
- Husa, Jaakko, Kimmo Nuotio, and HeikkuPihlajamäki. 2008.: “Nordic Law–Between Tradition and Dynamism.” InNordic Law–Between Tradition and Dynamism edited by Jaakko Husa, Kimmo Nuotio, and HeikkuPihlajamäki, 1-40. Oxford: Intersentia.
- Lindström-Ihre, Lenaand, and Robert Karlsson. 2008. “De nya CFC reglerna – är en verklig etablering afärsmässig eller ej?.” Skattenytt (10), 605–16.
- Isenbergh, Joseph. 2008. International Taxation – U.S. Taxation of Foreign Persons and Foreign Income. Chicago: CCH.
- Jiménez, Martín. 2012. “Towards a Homogeneous Theory of Abuse in EU (Direct) Tax Law.” Bulletin of International Tax Law 66 (4/5), 270–92.
- Kleist, David. 2008. “Någraytterligara kommentarer angåendeförhål-landetmellamskatteavtalenoch intern rätt.” Skattenytt (11), 708– 14.
- Kraft, Gerhard and Diana Beck. 2012. “Fifty Years of Subpart F Revisited in the Light of Modified Economic Conditions.” Intertax 40 (12), 683–90.
- Kristofersen, Eleonor. 2015. “Comparative studies of national law in the EU harmonized VAT.” Nordic Tax Journal (2 – ahead of print).
- Kuzniacki, Blazej: “The Need to Avoid Double Economic Taxation Triggered by CFC Rules under Tax Treaties, and the Way to Achieve it.” Intertax 43 (12), 758–72.
- Leväjärvi, Nina. 2013. “Finland.” In Cahiers de droit fscal international 98a, edited by International Fiscal Association, 289–97. The Hague: SDU Uitgivers.
- Lokken, Lawrance.2005. “Whatever HappenedtoSubpartF?U.S.CFC Legislation after the Check-the-Box Regulations.” Florida Tax Law Review (7), 185–209.
- Michelsen, Aage. “Kommentar til udvalgte afgørelser – CFC-beskatning – forholdet til dobbeltbeskatningsoverenskomsterne og EU-retten. Revision & Regnskabsvæsen (1), SM 2-5.
- Naas, Henning, Christian Bruusgaard, Kristine Ilstad, and Kristian Svensen. 2011. NorskInternasjonalSkatterett. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
- Meussen, G.T.K. 2007. “Cadbury Schweppes: The ECJ Significantly Limits the Application of CFC Rules in the Member States.” European Taxation 47 (1), 13–18.
- OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015a. “Designing Effective Controlled Foreign Company Rules, Action 3, Final Report.” Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015b.”Explanatory Statement – Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project.” Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015c: “Countering Harmful Tax Practices More Effectively, Taking into Account Transparency and Substance, Action 5, Final Report.” Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015d: Preventing the Granting of Treaty Benefits in Inappropriate Circumstances, Action 6, Final Report.” Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015e: Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy, Action 1, Final Report.” Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015f: “Neutralizing the Effects of Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements, Action 2, Final Report.” Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015g: “Limiting Base Erosion Involving Interest Deductions and other Financial Payments, Action 4, Final Report.” Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015h: “Aligning Transfer Pricing Rules with Value Creation, Action 8-10, Final Report.” Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2013a. “Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting.” Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2013b. “Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting.” Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1998. “Harmful Tax Competition – An Emerging Global Issue.” Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1996. “Controlled Foreign Company Legislation.” Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1987. “Double Taxation Conventions and the Use of Base Companies.” Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Panayi, Christiana HJI. 2016. “The Compatibility of the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Proposals with EU Law”. Bulletin for International Taxation 70 (1-2): 95–112.
- Passalacqua, Anna and Lars Henie. 2008. “The Norwegian CFC Rules after the Cadbury Schweppes Case.” Intertax 36 (8/9), 378–88.
- Pistone, Pasquale. 2014. “Coordinating the Actions of Regional and Global Players during the Shift from BilateralismtoMultilateralism in International Tax Law.” World Tax Journal 6 (1), 3–9.
- Rapakko, Annamaria. 1989. Base Company Taxation. Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.
- Rust, Alexander. 2008. ”CFC Legislation and EC Law.” Intertax 36 (11), 492–501.
- Rønfieldt, Thomas. 2010. Skatteværn og EU-frihed: Værnsregler i dansk skatteret konfronteret med fællesskabsrettens frihedsrettigheder som dynamisk udviklet af EF-domstolen. Copenhagen: Jurist-og Økonomforbundets Forlag.
- Samuelson, Lars and Christian Karlsson. 2010. ”Skatteverketsförslag til ändringer i CFC Lägstiftningen.” Skattenytt (7/8), 530– 36.
- Sandler, Daniel. 1998. Tax Treaties and Controlled Foreign Company Legislation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
- Schmidt, Peter Koerver. 2016. ”Taxation of Income in Foreign Trusts: Denmark Introduces New Anti-avoidance Rule Targeting the Use of Foreign Trusts.” Intertax 44 (2), 185–91.
- Schmidt, Peter Koerver. 2014. “Are the Danish CFC Rules in Conflict with the Freedom of Establishment? – An Analysis of the Danish CFC Regime in Light of ECJ Case Law.” European Taxation 54 (1), 3–9.
- Schmidt, Peter Koerver. 2013a. Dansk CFC-beskatning – i et internationalt og komparativt perspektiv. Copenhagen: Karnov Group.
- Schmidt, Peter Koerver. 2013b. “Denmark.” In Cahiers de droit fscal international 98a, edited by International Fiscal Association, 259-77. The Hague: SDU Uitgivers.
- Schön, Wolfgang. 2012. “Taxing Multinationals in Europe – Working Paper 11. Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance Research Paper Series.
- Svensen, Christian. 2013. “Norway.” In Cahiers de droit fscal international 98a, 547-59. The Hague: SDU Uitgivers.
- Terra, Ben and Peter Wattel. 2012. European Tax Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
- Weeghel, Steff van. 2010. “General Report.” In Cahiers de droit fscal international 95a, edited by International Fiscal Association, 17-55. The Hague: SDU Uitgivers.
- Wenehed, Lars-Erik. 2000. CFC-lagstiftningen – en studie av CFC-beskattning I belysning av den internationellabeskattningsrättensutsträkning, den internationellaskatterätten, neutral beskattning samt beskatning efter skatteförmåga. Lund: Juristförlaget.
- Zimmer, Frederik. 2009. Internasjonalinntektsskatterett. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.