Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Beyond the Pioneer Days! Where is Reception Research Going? Cover

Beyond the Pioneer Days! Where is Reception Research Going?

Open Access
|Feb 2017

References

  1. Alasuutari, P. (1995) Researching Culture: Qualitative Method and Cultural Studies. London: Sage.
  2. Alsted, C. (1989) ‘Semiologi og den kvalitative pretest af reklamefilm’, MedieKultur 10.10.7146/mediekultur.v5i10.806
  3. Ang, I. (1991) Desperately Seeking the Audience. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203321454
  4. Ang, I., & Hermes, J. (1991) ‘Gender and/in Media Consumption’, in J. Curran & M. Gurevitch, (ed.) Mass Media and Society. London: Edward Arnold.
  5. Bergman, S. (1998) ‘How a Rabbit is Pulled Out of a Hat: Repertoire Analysis as a Tool for Reconstructing the Meaning of ICTs in Daily Life’, in R. Silverstone & M. Hartmann (1998).
  6. Buhl, C. (1991) ‘The Consumer’s Ad. The Art of Making Sense of Advertising’, in H.H. Larsen m.fl., (red.) (1991).
  7. Camargo, E. (1987) ‘The Measurement of Meaning: Sherlock Holmes in Pursuit of the Marlboro Man’, in J. Umiker-Sebeok, (ed.), Marketing and Semiotics. New Directions in the Study of Signs for Sale. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110853254.463
  8. Dahl. H. & Buhl, C. (1993) Marketing og semiotik. København: Akademisk Forlag.
  9. Drotner, K. (1994) ‘Ethnographic Enigmas: ‘The Everyday’ in Recent Media Studies’, Cultural Studies, vol. 8 no. 2.10.1080/09502389400490491
  10. Drotner, K. (1999) Unge, medier og modernitet - pejlinger i et foranderligt landskab. København: Borgen.
  11. Frey, L.R., Botan, C.H., Friedman, P.G., Kreps, G.L. (1991) Investigating Communication. An Introduction to Research Methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  12. Frissen, V. & Punie, Y. (1998) ‘Never Mind the Gap - Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in ICTUser Research: The Case of Busy Households’, in R. Silverstone & M. Hartmann (1998).
  13. Gantz, W. (1996) ‘An Examination of the Range and Salience of Gratifications Research Associated with Entertainment Programming’, Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences, vol. 1996 no.1, Tokai University, Japan.
  14. Gjedde, L. & Ingemann, B. (1999) ‘In the Beginning was the Experience: The Experimental Reception Studies’, paper presented to the 14th Nordic Conference of Media and Communication Research, Kungälv, Sweden, August 1999.
  15. Hall, S. (1973/1980) ‘Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse’. Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, Stencilled Occasional Paper no. 7. Birmingham: University of Birmingham. Shorter version published in S. Hall m.fl., (eds.) (1980) Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson.
  16. Hjort, A. (1985) ‘Kvinderne og Dallas’, in R. Pittelkow, (ed.), Analyser af tv. København: Medusa.
  17. Hobson, D. (1982) ‘Crossroads’: Drama of a Soap Opera. London: Methuen.
  18. Höijer, B. (1998) ‘Social Psychological Perspectives in Reception Analysis’, in R. Dickinson, R. Harindranath, O. Linné, (eds.), Approaches to Audiences. A reader. London: Arnold.
  19. Höijer, B. & Werner, A. (1998) Cultural Cognition. New Perspectives in Audience Theory. Göteborg: Nordicom.
  20. Højbjerg, L., (ed.) (1989) Reception af levende billeder. København: Akademisk Forlag.
  21. Ingemann, B. (1998) Fatamorgana - Pressefotografiets virkelighed og læsernes. København: Museum Tusculanums Forlag.
  22. Jensen, E. & Tufte, B. (1984) ‘Om kvalitativ empirisk receptionsforskning - eksemplificeret ved en undersøgelse af børns brug og oplevelse af video’. Massekultur & Medier nr. 10.10.7146/masmed.v4i10.5092
  23. Jensen, K.B., (ed.) (1998) News of the World. World Cultures Look at Television News. London: Routledge.
  24. Jensen, K. B. (1995) The Social Semiotics of Mass Communication. London: Sage Publications.
  25. Jensen, K.B. (1991) ‘Reception Analysis: Mass Communication as the Social Production of Meaning’, in K.B. Jensen & N.W. Jankowski, (eds.), A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research. London: Routledge.
  26. Jensen, K.B. (1986) Making Sense of the News: Towards a Theory and an Empirical Model of Reception for the Study of Mass Communication. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetspresse.
  27. Jensen, K.B., Schrøder, K., Stampe, T., Søndergaard, H., Topsøe-Jensen J. (1994) ‘Super Flow, Channel Flows and Audience Flows. A Study of Viewers’ Reception of Television as Flow’, The Nordicom Review, no. 2, 1994.
  28. Jerslev, A. (1999) Det er bare film. Unges videofællesskaber og vold på film, København: Gyldendal.
  29. Larsen, H.H., Mick, D.G., Alsted, C., (red.) (1991) Marketing and Semiotics. Selected Papers from the Copenhagen Symposium, København: Handelshøjskolens Forlag.
  30. Larsen, P. (1974) ‘McCloud som ideologisk og industrielt produkt’, in M.B. Andersen & J. Poulsen, (eds.) Mediesociologi, København: Rhodos.
  31. Lewis, J. (1991) The Ideological Octopus. An Exploration of Television and its Audience, New York: Routledge.
  32. Lindlof, T.R. (1995) Qualitative Communication Research Methods, London: Sage Publications.
  33. Livingstone, S. (1998a) ‘Mediated Childhoods. A Comparative Approach to Young People’s Changing Media Environment in Europe’, European Journal of Communication, vol. 13, no.4.10.1177/0267323198013004001
  34. Livingstone, S. (1998b) ‘Audience Research at the Crossroads: The ‘Implied Audience’ in Media and Cultural Theory’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 1, no. 2.10.1177/136754949800100203
  35. Lunt, P. & Livingstone, S. (1996) ‘Rethinking the Focus Group in Media and Communications Research’, Journal of Communication, vol. 46, no. 2.10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01475.x
  36. Mayer, P. (1998) ‘Qualitative Audience Research in the Context of Computer Media: A Generative Survey’, Sekvens 1998, Årbog fra Institut for Film- og Medievidenskab, Københavns Universitet.
  37. Medievold - børn og unge (1995) Udvalg vedrørende film-, tv- og videovold. København: Kulturministeriet.
  38. Mick, D. (1986) ‘Consumer Research and Semiotics: Exploring the Morphology of Signs, Symbols, and Significance’, Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 13, 1986.
  39. Mick, D.G. & Buhl, C. (1992) ‘A Meaning-Based Model of Advertising Experiences’, Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 19.
  40. Mick, D.G. & Politi, L. G. (1989) ‘Consumers’ Interpretation of Advertising Imagery: A Visit to the Hell of Connotation’, in E.C. Hirschman, (ed.) Interpretive Consumer Research, Provo, Mass.: Association for consumer research.
  41. Mikkelsen, J.F. (1989) ‘Pragmatisk Receptionsteori’, in L. Højbjerg, (ed.) (1989).
  42. Morley, D. (1980) The ‘Nationwide’ Audience. London: British Film Institute.
  43. Morley, D. (1986) Family Television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure. London: Comedia.
  44. Myers, G. (1998) ‘Displaying Opinions: Topics and Disagreement in Focus Groups’, Language in Society, vol. 27.
  45. Nielsen, N. Aa. (1982) Seriesening i TV: Når tiden er gået hurtigt, er den gået godt. Forskningsrapport nr. 4B782. København: Danmarks Radio.
  46. Peirce, C.S. (1985) ‘Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs’, in H. Innis, (ed.) Semiotics: An Introductory Anthology, Bloomington: Indiana U.P.
  47. Poulsen, J. (1998) Måske-læserne. Dagbladenes muligheder i mediekonkurrencen. Hovedrapport i projektet ‘Måske-læserne’, Institut for Kommunikation. Roskilde Universitetscenter.
  48. Povlsen, K.K. (1999) Beverly Hills 90210. Soaps, ironi og danske unge. Århus: Klim.
  49. Radway, J. (1988) ‘Reception Study: Ethnography and the Problem of Dispersed Audiences and Nomadic Subjects’, Cultural Studies, vol. 2 no. 3. Radway, J. (1984) Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.10.1080/09502388800490231
  50. Roe, K. (1996) ‘The Uses and Gratifications Approach: A Review of Some Methodological Issues’, Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences, vol 1996 no.1, Tokai University, Japan.
  51. Roscoe, T. (1999) ‘The Construction of the World Wide Web Audience’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 21.
  52. Rosengren, K.E. (1996) ‘Review of Klaus Bruhn Jensen, The Social Semiotics of Mass Communication’, European Journal of Communication, vol. 11 no. 1.
  53. Schrøder, K. (2000) ‘Making Sense of Audience Discourses. Towards a Multidimensional Model of Mass Media Reception’, The European Journal of Cultural Studies.10.1177/136754940000300205
  54. Schrøder, K. (1999) ‘The Best of Both Worlds? Media Audience Research between Rival Paradigms’, in P. Alatuusari, (ed.) Rethinking the Media Audience. The New Agenda, London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446216996.n3
  55. Schrøder, K. (1997) ‘Cynicism and Ambiguity: British Corporate Responsibility Advertisements and their Readers in the 1990s’, in M. Nava et al., (eds.) Buy this Book. Studies in Advertising and Consumption, London: Routledge.
  56. Schrøder, K. (1995) Danskerne og Medierne: Dagligdag og Demokrati, Rapport til Regeringens Medieudvalg, København: Statsministeriet.
  57. Schrøder, K. (1994) ‘Audience Semiotics, Interpretive Communities and the ‘Ethnographic Turn’ in Media Research’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 16 no. 2.10.1177/016344379401600208
  58. Schrøder, K. (1989) ‘The Playful Audience: The Continuity of the Popular Cultural Tradition in America’, in M. Skovmand, (red.), Media Fictions, Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetspresse.
  59. Schrøder, K. (1988) ‘The Pleasure of DYNASTY, in P. Drummond & R. Paterson, (red.), Television and its Audience: International Research Perspectives, London: British Film Institute.
  60. Schrøder, K. (1987) ‘Convergence of Antagonistic Traditions? The Case of Audience Research’, European Journal of Communication, vol. 2, no.1.10.1177/0267323187002001002
  61. Schrøder, K. (1984) Et måleinstruments anvendelighed - om ‘den ideologiske seismograf’’, Massekultur & Medier 12.10.7146/masmed.v4i12.5111
  62. Sepstrup, P. (1979) ‘Metodiske udviklingsmuligheder i indholdsanalysen’, Bidrag. Bevidsthedssociologisk tidsskrift, nr. 9-10, Institut for Litteraturvidenskab, Odense Universitet.
  63. Silverman, D. (1993) Interpreting Qualitative Data, London: Sage Publications.
  64. Silverstone, R. & Hartmann, M. (eds), (1998) Methodologies for Media and Information Technology Research in Everyday Life. Graduate Research Centre in Culture and Communication, University of Sussex.
  65. Silverstone, R. (1994) Television and Everyday Life. London: Routledge.
  66. Stald, G. (1998) ‘Living with Computers. Young Danes’ Uses of and Thoughts on the Uses of Computers’, Sekvens 1998. Årbog fra Institut for Film- og Medievidenskab, Københavns Universitet.
  67. Tufte, B. (1999) Børn og TV-reklame. Forskningsrapport, Danmarks Lærerhøjskole. /WWW.sebnet.dk/
  68. Vestergaard, T. & Schrøder, K. (1985) The Language of Advertising. Oxford og New York: Blackwell.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0341 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 23 - 36
Published on: Feb 28, 2017
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Kim Christian Schrøder, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.