Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Right to Privacy under Pressure Cover

The Right to Privacy under Pressure

Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. Anderson, Elizabeth (1995). Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  2. Bechmann, Anja (2014). Non-informed Consent Cultures: Privacy Policies and App Contracts on Facebook. Journal of Media Business Studies 11(1): 21–38.
  3. Digital Rights Ireland and Seitlinger and others, April 8, 2014, Joined Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12, http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=153045&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=430603 [Accessed 10 October 2016].
  4. European Digital Rights (2011). US Lobbying against Draft Data Protection Regulation. 22 December 2011. Retrieved 21 May, 2015, from https://edri.org/us-dpr/.
  5. Jørgensen, Rikke Frank (2014). The Unbearable Lightness of User Consent. Internet Policy Review 3(4), http://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/unbearable-lightness-user-consent [Accessed 10 October 2016].
  6. Lane, Julia, Victoria Stodden, Stefan Bender, Helen Nissenbaum eds. (2014). Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good :Frameworks for Engagement. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Marwick, Alice E. (2012). The Public Domain: Social Surveillance in Everyday Life. Surveillance & Society, 9(4): 378–393.
  8. Matzner, Tobias (2014). Why Privacy Is Not Enough: Privacy in the Context of “Ubiquitous Computing” and “Big Data”. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 12(2): 93–106.
  9. Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, 6 October 2015, Case C-362/14, http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=169195&doclang=en [Accessed 10 October 2016].
  10. Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor & Cukier, Kenneth (2013). Big Data : A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  11. Nissenbaum, Helen (2011). A Contextual Approach to Privacy Online. Dædalus, the Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 140(4): 32–48.
  12. OECD (1980/2013). Guidelines for Protection of Privacy and Transnational Data Flow http://www.oecd.org/internet/ieconomy/oecdguidelinesontheprotectionofprivacyandtransborderflowsofpersonaldata.htm [Accessed 10 October 2016].
  13. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:2016:119:FULL&from=EN [Accessed 10 October 2016].
  14. Rössler, Beate (2007). The Value of Privacy, pp. 39–44 in Stocker, Gerfried & Schöpf, Christine (eds.) Goodbye Privacy – Ars Electronica 2007. Ostfildern-Ruit, Germany: Hatje Cantz Verlag.
  15. UNHRC (2012). United Nations Human Rights Council, The Promotion, Protection and Enjoyment of Human Rights on the Internet. A/HRC/20/8. 16 July 2012. Geneva, United Nations.
  16. Warren, Samuel D. & Brandeis, Louis D (1890). The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review IV (5), 15 December No. 5, http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/privacy/Privacy_brand_warr2.html [Accessed 10 October 2016].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0030 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 165 - 170
Published on: Jul 7, 2020
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Rikke Frank Jørgensen, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.