Have a personal or library account? Click to login

High Stakes

Nordicom Review
Volume 37 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)
By:
Open Access
|Jun 2016

References

  1. Barnett, Steven (2002) Will a crisis in journalism provoke a crisis in democracy? The Political Quarterly, 73(4), 400-408.10.1111/1467-923X.00494
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Bell, Allan (1994) Media (mis) communication on the science of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 3(3), 259-275.10.1088/0963-6625/3/3/002
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Besley, John C., & Nisbet, Matthew (2011) How scientists view the public, the media and the political process. Public Understanding of Science, 22(6), 644-659.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Blach-Ørsten, Mark, & Burkal, Rasmus (2014) Credibility and the media as a political institution. Nordicom Review. Special issue.10.2478/nor-2014-0104
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Brumfiel, Geoff (2009) Science journalism: Supplanting the old media? Nature News, 458(7236), 274-277.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Carlsen, Benedicte, & Glenton, Claire (2011) What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 26.10.1186/1471-2288-11-26
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Carlsen, Benedicte, Müftüoglu, Ingrid Birce, & Riese, Hanne (2014) Forskning i media-Forskere om motivasjon og erfaringer fra medieintervjuer. Norsk Medietidsskrift(03), 188-208.10.18261/ISSN0805-9535-2014-03-02
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Castell, Sarah, Charlton, Anne, Clemence, Michael, Pettigrew, Nick, Pope, Sarah, Quigley, Anna, Shah, Jayesh Navin & Silman, Tim (2014) Public Attitudes to Science 2014. London: Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Connelly, F. Michael, & Clandinin, D. Jean (1990) Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational researcher, 19(5), 2-14.10.3102/0013189X019005002
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Eide, Martin, & Ottosen, Rune (1994) `Science journalism’ without science journalists: notes on a Norwegian media paradox. Public Understanding of Science, 3(4), 425-434.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Göpfert, Winfried (2007) The strength of PR and the weakness of science journalism. Journalism, Science and Society, 215.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Kalleberg, Ragnvald (2012) Sociologists as Public Intellectuals and Experts. Journal of Applied Social Science, 6(1), 43-52.10.1177/1936724411435747
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Kovach, Bill, & Rosenstiel, Tom (2007) The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. Three Rivers Press (CA).
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Kvale, Steinar (1996) Interviews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Løvhaug, Johannes W. (2011) Overlæreren i rampelyset. Universitetet i mediesamfunnet 1970-2011 (The head teacher in the limelight. The University in the media society 1970-2011). In John Peter Collet (Ed.) Universitetet i Oslo 1811-2011 (Vol. 7, pp. 367-509). Oslo: Unipub.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Miles, Matthew, & Huberman, Michael. (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Patton, Michael Quinn (2005) Qualitative Research Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/0470013192.bsa514
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Peters, Hans Peter (1995) The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: co-operation and conflict between two professional cultures. Media, Culture & Society, 17(1), 31-48.10.1177/016344395017001003
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Peters, Hans Peter, Brossard, Dominique, de Cheveigné, Suzanne, Dunwoody, Sharon, Kallfass, Monika, Miller, Steve, & Tsuchida, Shoji (2008) Science-Media Interface: It’s Time to Reconsider. Science Communication, 30(2), 266-276.10.1177/1075547008324809
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Reed, Rosslyn (2001) (Un-)Professional discourse?: Journalists’ and scientists’ stories about science in the media. Journalism, 2(3), 279-298.10.1177/146488490100200310
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Schäfer, Mike S. (2012) Taking stock: A meta-analysis of studies on the media’s coverage of science. Public Understanding of Science, 21(6), 650-663.10.1177/0963662510387559
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Silverman, David (1985) Qualitative methodology and sociology: describing the social world. Gower Publishing Ltd.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Smith, Katherine Clegg, Singer, Rachel Friedman, & Kromm, Elisabeth Edsall (2010) Getting Cancer Research Into the News: A Communication Case Study Centered on One U.S. Comprehensive Cancer Center. Science Communication, 32(2), 202-231.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Wilson, Kris M. (1995) Mass media as sources of global warming knowledge. Mass Comm Review, 22, 75-89.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 85 - 99
Published on: Jun 15, 2016
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
research communication,
science communication,
news sources,
researchers in the media,
sociology of science
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Communication science,
Mass communication,
Public and political communication

© 2016 Benedicte Carlsen, Hanne Riese, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 37 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)Next article