Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Knowledge Management and Czech Self-Governments: Empirical Investigations into the Application of Knowledge Management to Public Administration in the Czech Republic Cover

Knowledge Management and Czech Self-Governments: Empirical Investigations into the Application of Knowledge Management to Public Administration in the Czech Republic

By: David Špaček and  Eva Gatarik  
Open Access
|Jul 2017

References

  1. Alavi, M. and D. E. Leidner. 2001. “Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues.” MIS Quarterly 25(1), 107–136.
  2. Allee, V. 2003. The Future of Knowledge: Increasing Prosperity Through Value Networks. Amsterdam et al.: Routledge.
  3. Ammons, D. N. and D. J. Roenigk. 2015. “Performance Management in Local Government: Is Practice Influenced by Doctrine?” Public Performance & Management Review 38(3), 514–541.
  4. Andriessen, D. G. 2008. “Stuffor Love? How Metaphors Direct our Efforts to Manage Knowledge in Organizations.” Knowledge Management Research & Practice 6(1), 5–12.
  5. Bolisani, E. and M. Handzic (eds). 2015. Advances in Knowledge Management: Celebrating Twenty Years of Research and Practice. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-09501-1
  6. Burford, S. and S. Ferguson. 2009. “Managing Knowledge by Intention: The Role of Standards, Frameworks and Models.” Actkm Online Journal of Knowledge Management 5(1), 3–14.
  7. Cong, X. and K. V. Pandya. 2003. “Issues of Knowledge Management in the Public Sector.” Academic Conferences Limited, http://www.ejkm.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=17 (accessed June 1, 2017).
  8. Deming, W. E. 1986. Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
  9. Deming, W. E. 1993. The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
  10. Edwards, J. S. 2015. “Knowledge Management Concepts and Models.” In Bolisani, E. and Handzic, M. (eds.). Advances in Knowledge Management: Celebrating Twenty Years of Research and Practice. Heidelberg: Springer, 25–44.
  11. Farzin, M. R. et al. 2014. “A Survey of Critical Success Factors for Strategic Knowledge Management Implementation: Applications for Service Sector.” Procedia: Social and Behavioural Sciences 109, 595–599.
  12. Ferguson, S. 2006. “AS 5037–2005: Knowledge Management Blueprint for Australian Organisations?” The Australian Library Journal 55(3), 196–209.
  13. Firestone, J. M. and M. W. McElroy. 2003. Key Issues in the New Knowledge Management. Amsterdam et al.: Routledge.10.1016/B978-0-7506-7655-7.50008-0
  14. Frischmann, B. M, M. J. Madison and K. J. Strandburg (eds). 2014. Governing Knowledge Commons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199972036.001.0001
  15. Gatarik, E. 2014. “The Many Faces of ‘Innovation Ecosystems’: Investigating and Reflecting the Ecology of Decision-Making as Core of the Topic.” IFKAD 2014, 1887–1906.
  16. Gatarik, E. and R. Born. 2012. “The Practice of Network Economics as a Competitive Advantage of Regions and Societies.” IFKAD – KCWS 2012, 2143–2166.
  17. Gatarik, E. and R. Born. 2015. “Managing Network Economies: The Competitive Advantage of Commons as Ecosystems of Innovation.” Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change 12(3), 287–307.
  18. Gatarik, E. and R. Born. (forthcoming). “Innovating for Organisational Resilience: An Epistemological Investigation into Business Continuity Practice in an Austrian SME.” Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change VOL.
  19. Gödel, K. 1931. “Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I.” Monatsheft e für Mathematik und Physik 38(1), 173–198.
  20. Hamel, G. 2012. What Matters Now: How to Win in a World of Relentless Change, Ferocious Competition and Unstoppable Innovation. Hoboken: Wiley.
  21. Hammer, M. and J. Champy. 1993. Reengineering the Corporation: Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York: Harper Collins.10.1016/S0007-6813(05)80064-3
  22. Hammerschmid, G., S. Van de Walle and V. Stimac. 2013. “Internal and External Use of Performance Information in Public Organizations: Results from an International Survey.” Public Money & Management 33(4), 261–268.
  23. Handzic, M. A. 2015. “Descriptive Analysis of Knowledge Management Research: Period from 1997 to 2012.” In Bolisani, E. and Handzic, M. (eds.). Advances in Knowledge Management: Celebrating Twenty Years of Research and Practice. Heidelberg: Springer, 45–66.
  24. Hasan, H. M. 2004. Bottling Fog: Conjuring up the Australian KM Standard. Research Online. University of Wollongong. Available online at: http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1360&context=commpapers (accessed June 1, 2017).
  25. Hess, C. and E. Ostrom (eds). 2007. Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 41–81.
  26. Klimovský, D. et al. 2014. “Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Lithuania and Slovakia: Does Size Structure Matter?” Lex Localis: Journal of Local Self-Government 12(3), 643–658.
  27. Martin, J. and A. Spano. 2015. “From Performance Management to Strategic Local Government Leadership: Lessons from Different Cultural Settings.” Public Money & Management 35(4), 303–309.
  28. Matejova, L. et al. 2015. “Political Business Cycle in Local Government: Case Study of Czech Municipalities.” In Matejova, L. and Spalkova, D. (eds.). Proceedings of the 19thInternational Conference: Current Trends in Public Sector Research. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita, 142–148.
  29. Nam, T. and T. A. Pardo. 2011. “Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions.” In Proceedings of the 12thAnnual International Conference on Digital Government Research. Also available at: https://inta-aivn.org/images/cc/Urbanism/background%20documents/dgo_2011_smartcity.pdf (accessed June 1, 2017).10.1145/2037556.2037602
  30. Němec, J., B. Mikušová Meričková and M. Svidroňová. 2015a. “Co-Creation in Local Public Services Delivery Innovation: Slovak Experience.” Lex Localis: Journal of Local Self-Government 13(3), 521–535.
  31. Němec, J., B. Mikušová Meričková and M. Svidroňová. 2015b. “Social Innovations in Public Services: Co-Creation in Slovakia.” In Schoburgh, E. and Ryan, R. (eds.). Sborník z mezinárodního vědeckého semináře: Current Trends in Public Sector Research Xix. Brno: Ekonomicko, Správní Fakulta, 273–281.
  32. Nielsen, P. A. 2014. “Learning from Performance Feedback: Performance Information, Aspiration Levels, and Managerial Priorities.” Public Administration 92(1), 142–160.
  33. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3
  34. Nowak, M. and R. Highfield. 2011. Supercooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  35. Osono, E., N. Shimizu and H. Takeuchi. 2008. Extreme Toyota: Radical Contradictions that Drive Success at the World’s Best Manufacturer. Hoboken: Wiley.
  36. Ostrom, E. 2009. “Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems” Nobel Prize lecture. Stockholm, Sweden: Nobel Media, 8 December 2009.
  37. Plaček, M., F. Ochrana and M. Půček. 2015. “Benchmarking in Czech Higher Education: The Case of Schools of Economics.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 37(4), 374–384.
  38. Plaček, M., M. Půček and F. Ochrana. 2016. “Political Business Cycle in the Czech Republic: Case of Municipalities.” Prague Economic Papers 25(3), 304–320.
  39. Plaček, M., M. Schmidt, F. Ochrana et al. 2016. “Impact of Selected Factors regarding the Efficiency of Public Procurement (The Case of the Czech Republic) with an Emphasis on Decentralization.” Ekonomický Časopis 64(1), 22–36.
  40. Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
  41. Prusak, L. 2001. “Where did Knowledge Management Come from?” IBM Systems Journal 40(4), 1002–1007.
  42. Rifk in, J. 2014. The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. New York: Macmillan.
  43. Simon, H. A. 1947. Administrative Behavior: A Study of the Decision-making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Macmillan.
  44. Špaček, D. 2015. “Quality Management in the Czech Public Administration.” In Vries, M. and Nemec, J. (eds.). Implementation of New Public Management Tools: Experiences from Transition and Emerging Countries. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 285–304.
  45. Špaček, D. 2016. “Knowledge Management in Public Administration and Research in the Czech Republic: Preliminary Findings.” In Matějová, L. and Špalková, D. (eds.). Proceedings of the 20thInternational Conference Current Trends in Public Sector Research. Brno: Ekonomicko-správní fakulta, 94–101.
  46. Spender, J. C. 2015. “Knowledge Management: Origins, History, and Development.” In Bolisani, E. and Handzic, M. (eds.). Advances in Knowledge Management: Celebrating Twenty Years of Research and Practice. Heidelberg: Springer, 3–24.
  47. Taylor, F. W. 1919. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
  48. Weick, K. E. and K. M. Sutcliffe. 2015. Managing the Unexpected: Sustained Performance in a Complex World. Hoboken: Wiley.10.1002/9781119175834
  49. Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Language: English
Page range: 201 - 220
Published on: Jul 8, 2017
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 David Špaček, Eva Gatarik, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.