Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Economies of Scale on the Municipal Level: Fact or Fiction in the Czech Republic? Cover

Economies of Scale on the Municipal Level: Fact or Fiction in the Czech Republic?

Open Access
|Jul 2017

References

  1. Allan, Percy. 2003. “Why Smaller Councils Make Sense.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 62, 74–81.
  2. Alt, James E. 1971. “Some Social and Political Correlates of County Borough Expenditures.” British Journal of Political Science 1, 49–62.
  3. Appelbaum, Richard P. and Ross Follett. 1978. “Size, Growth, and Urban Life A Study of Medium-Sized American Cities.” Urban Affairs Review 14, 139–168.
  4. Baldersheim, Harald and Lawrence Rose. 2008. A Comparative Analysis of Territorial Choice in Europe. Oslo: Political Institute.
  5. Blom-Hansen, Jens. 2004. “Stordriftsfordele i den kommunale serviceproduktion? Skoleområdet som eksempel.” In Jens Blom-Hansen, Asbjørn Sonne Norgaard and Thomas Pallesen (eds). Politisk Ukorrekt. Århus Universitetsforlag, 250–274.
  6. Bours, Adriann. 1993. “Management, Tiers, Size and Amalgamations of Local Government.” In Robert Bennett (ed.). Local Government in the New Europe. London: Belhaven, 130–163.
  7. Bovaird, Tony and Elke Löffler. 2003. “Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance: Indicators, Models and Methodologies.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 69, 313–328.
  8. Boyne, A. George. 1995. “Population Size and Economies of Scale in Local Government.” Policy and Politics 23, 213–222.
  9. Byrnes, Joel and Bryan Dollery. 2002. “Do Economies of Scale Exist in Australian Local Government? A Review of the Research Evidence.” Urban Policy and Research 20, 391–414.
  10. Coase, H. Ronald. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4, 386–405.
  11. Czech Statistical Office. 2016. Malý lexikon obcí ČR 2015. Available at https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/maly-lexikon-obci-ceske-republiky-2015 (last accessed 20 June 2016).
  12. Dahl, R. Allan and Edward R. Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  13. Davies, Bleddyn. 1971. Variations in Services for the Aged: A Causal Analysis (No. 40). London: G. Bell and Sons.
  14. Denters, Bas. 2002. “Size and Political Trust: Evidence from Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, and the United Kingdom.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20, 793–812.
  15. Dollery, Bryan, Joel Byrnes and Lin Crase. 2008. “Australian Local Government Amalgamation: A Conceptual of Analysis Population Size and Scale Economies in Municipal Service Provision.” Australasian Journal of Regional Studies 14, 167.
  16. Dollery, Bryan, and Euan Fleming. 2006. “A Conceptual Note on Scale Economies, Size Economies and Scope Economies in Australian Local Government.” Urban Policy and Research 24, 271–282.
  17. Drew, Joseph, Andy Kortt and Bryan Dollery. 2012. “Economies of Scale and Local Government Expenditure: Evidence from Australia.” Administration & Society 20, 1–22.
  18. Faulk, Dagney Gail and Joel Hicks. 2011. Local Government Consolidation in the United States. New York: Cambria Press.
  19. Foster, D. Christopher, Richard Jackman and Morris Perlman. 1980. Local Government Finance in a Unitary State. London: George Allen and Unwin.
  20. Fox, William F. and Tami Gurley-Calvez. 2006. “Will Consolidation Improve Sub-National Governments?” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3913.10.1596/1813-9450-3913
  21. Galvasová, Iveta et al. 2007. Identifikace kompetencí zatěžujících výkon veřejné správy se zvláštním přihlédnutím k malým obcím. Available at http://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/identifikace-kompetenci-zatezujicich-vykon-verejne-spravy-se-zvlastnim-prihlednutim-k-malym-obcim-1-etapa.aspx (ast accessed 15 August 2016).
  22. Goldsmith, M. and Lawrence E. Rose. 2000. “Constituency, Size and Electoral Politics: A Comparison of Patterns at Local Elections in Norway and the UK.” Paper presented at the IPSA 18th World Congress, Quebec, Canada.
  23. Hampl, Martin and Jan Müller. 1998. “Jsou obce v České republice příliš malé.” Geografie – Sborník ČGS 103, 1–12.
  24. Hansen, Sune Welling, Kurt Houlberg and Lene Holm Pedersen. 2014. “Do Municipal Mergers Improve Fiscal Outcomes?” Scandinavian Political Studies 37, 196–214.
  25. Hertzog, Robert. 2010. “Inter-municipal co-operation: a viable alternative to territorial amalgamation?” In Pawel Swianiewicz (ed.). Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Europe. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, 289–312.
  26. Hirsch, Z. Werner. 1959. “Expenditure Implications of Metropolitan Growth and Consolidation.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 1959, 232–241.
  27. Holcombe, G. Randall and DeEdgra W. Williams. 2009. “Are there Economies of Scale in Municipal Government Expenditures?” Public Finance and Management 9, 416.
  28. Houlberg, Kurt. 1995. “Kommunale stordriftsfordele: Myte eller realitet?” Nordisk administrativt tidsskrift 76, 65–88.
  29. Houlberg, Kurt. 2010. “Municipal Size, Economy, and Democracy.” In Pawel Swianiewicz (ed.). Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Europe. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, 309–331.
  30. Houlberg, Kurt and I. L. Møller. 2001. “Kommunestørrelse og udgift sniveau: Er der en sammenhæng?” In R. Norstrand and N. Groes (eds). Kommunestyrets fremtid. København: Akf Forlaget, 185–198.
  31. Hutcheson, John D. and James E. Prather. 1979. “Economy of Scale or Bureaucratic Entropy? Implications for Metropolitan Governmental Reorganization.” Urban Affairs Review 15, 164–182.
  32. Keating, Michael. 1995. “Size, Efficiency and Democracy: Consolidation, Fragmentation and Public Choice.” In D. Judge, G. Stoker. and H. Wollman (eds). Theories of Urban Politics. London: Sage, 117–134.
  33. King, N. David. 1984. Fiscal Tiers: The Economics of Multi-Level Government. London: Allen & Unwin.
  34. Kushner, Joseph and David Siegel. 2003. “Citizens’ Attitudes toward Municipal Amalgamation in Three Ontario Municipalities.” Canadian Journal of Regional Science 26, 49–60.
  35. Löffler, Elke. 2002. “Defining and Measuring Quality in Public Administration.” In Joanne Caddy and Mirko Vintar (ed.). Building Better Quality Administration for the Public: Case Studies from Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: Nispacee 15–34.
  36. Montén, Anna and Christian Thater. 2011. “Determinants of Efficiency in Child-Care Provision.” FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis 67, 378–403.
  37. Mouritzen, Poul Erik. 1989. “City Size and Citizens’ Satisfaction: Two Competing Theories Revisited.” European Journal of Political Research 17, 661–688.
  38. Mouritzen, Poul Erik. 1991. Den politiske cyklus. Aarhus: Politica.
  39. Musgrave, Richard Abel and Peggy B. Musgrave. 1989. Public Finance in Theory and Practice. New York: McGraw/Hill, Inc.
  40. Newton, Kenneth. 1982. “Is Small Really so Beautiful? Is Big Really so Ugly? Size, Effectiveness, and Democracy in Local Government.” Political Studies 30, 190–206.
  41. Nielsen, Hans Jorgen. 1981. “Size and Evaluation of Government: Danish Attitudes towards Politics at Multiple Levels of Government.” European Journal of Political Research 9, 47–60.
  42. Oates, Wallace E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. Chicago: Books.
  43. Oates, Wallace E. 1999. “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism.” Journal of Economic Literature 37, 1120–1149.
  44. OECD. 2004. OECD territorial reviews: The Czech Republic 2004. Available at http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/urban-rural-and-regional-development/oecd-territorial-reviews-czech-republic-2004_9789264106413-en (last accessed 27 June 2016).
  45. Pudil, Pavel et al. 2004. Zdanění a efektivnost. Praha: Eurolex Bohemia.
  46. Rose, Lawrence E. 2002. “Municipal Size and Local Nonelectoral Participation: Findings from Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20, 829–851.
  47. Sawyer, M. C. 1991. The Economics of Industries and Firms: Theories, Evidence and Policy. London: Routledge.
  48. Schofield, John A. 1978. “Determinants of Urban Service Expenditures: Fire and Social Services.” Local Government Studies 4, 65–80.
  49. Sharpe, J. 1995. “Local Government: Size, Efficiency and Citizen Participation.” In Michael Martins (ed.). The Size of Municipalities, Efficiency and Citizen Participation. Strasbourg: Local and Regional Authorities in Europe, Council of Europe, 56.
  50. Stigler, George J. 1958. “Economies of Scale.” The Journal of Political Economy 1958, 54.
  51. Soukopová, Jana. 2016. Efektivnost výdajů obcí na nakládání s odpady. Habilitation thesis, Masaryk University, Brno.
  52. Soukopová, Jana et al. 2014. “Municipality Size and Local Public Services: Do Economies of Scale Exist?” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 7, 151–171.
  53. Soukopová, Jana et al. 2016. “Factors Influencing the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Municipal Waste Management Expenditure.” Lex Localis 14, 359.
  54. Swianiewicz, Pawel. 2002. “Size of Local Government, Local Democracy and Efficiency in Delivery of Local Services: International Context and Theoretical Framework.” In Pawel Swianiewicz (ed.). Consolidation or Fragmentation: The Size of Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, 1–29.
  55. Swianiewicz, Pawel. 2010. “If Territorial Fragmentation is a Problem, is Amalgamation a Solution? An East European Perspective.” Local Government Studies 36, 183–203.
  56. Swianiewicz, Pawel. 2014. “An Empirical Typology of Local Government Systems in Eastern Europe.” Local Government Studies 40, 292–311.
  57. Tiebout, Charles M. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” The Journal of Political Economy 64, 416–424.
Language: English
Page range: 39 - 59
Published on: Jul 8, 2017
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Lenka Matějová, Juraj Nemec, Milan Křápek, Daniel Klimovský, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.