Administrative Aspects of Alternative Consumer Dispute Resolution in the European Union (EU), Slovenia and Croatia

Urša Jeretina

doi:10.1515/nispa-2016-0009

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Administrative Aspects of Alternative Consumer Dispute Resolution in the European Union (EU), Slovenia and Croatia

NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy

Volume 9 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)

By: Urša Jeretina

Open Access

|Aug 2016

Agrar, C. Haydar. 2012.Master in International Business Administration and Languages. Universidad de Almería.
Search in Google Scholar
Barnes, Javier. 2009.Seville: Global Law Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Cardona, P. Francesco and Anke Freibert. 2007. “The European Administrative Space and Sigma Assessments of EU Candidate Countries.”7(1), 51–59.
Search in Google Scholar
Cioclea, Elena A. 2012. “Principles of the European Administrative Space and their Impact on Performance in Public Organizations.”3, 288–295.
Search in Google Scholar
The Commercial Court of Republic of Croatia. 2013.Zagreb: Ministry of Justice, Republic of Croatia.
Search in Google Scholar
The Croatian Energy Regulatory Agency (HERA). 2013.Zagreb: The Energy Regulatory Agency, Republic of Croatia.
Search in Google Scholar
The Croatian Telecommunication Regulatory Agency (HAKOM). 2013.Zagreb: The Telecommunication Regulatory Agency, Republic of Croatia.
Search in Google Scholar
Davies, Jim. 2012. “How well Placed is the Optimism surrounding the new ADR/ODR Proposals ?”2, 63–64.
Search in Google Scholar
Directorate General for Health and Consumers – EC (DG SANCO). 2009.Final Report. Civic Consulting of the Consumer Policy Evaluation Consortium. Berlin: Civic Consulting.
Search in Google Scholar
Directorate General for Health and Consumers – EC (DG SANCO). 2011.. Berlin: Civic Consulting.
Search in Google Scholar
Directorate General for Health and Consumers – EC (DG SANCO). 2014.Public Version. Brussels: European Commission.
Search in Google Scholar
Dragos, Dacian C., Neamtu, Bogdana (2014).. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. 2010.Communication from the Commission Brussels: COM (2010) 2020 final.
Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011.Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee. Brussels: COM (791 final).
Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011a.Brussels: COM (707 final), 0340 (COD).
Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011b.Commission staff working paper, Brussels: 1409 final (SEC).
Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. 2012.. MEMO. Brusselss: European Commission.
Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. 2012a.. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: COM (2012) 573 final.
Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. 2013.Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(401 final).
Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. 2013a.(Regulation on consumer ODR).
Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. 2013b.(Directive on consumer ADR).
Search in Google Scholar
The Gallup Organization. 2011.. The survey requested by EUROSTAT and DG-SANCO and coordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication.
Search in Google Scholar
Goes, Pieter. 2014. “Legal Framework relating to Alternative Dispute Resolution in Belgium Public Law.”12(2–3), 9–31.
Search in Google Scholar
Herwig C. H. Hofmann, Jens-Peter Schneider and Jacques Ziller. (2014).Book IV – contracts. Version for online publication. EU: Research Network on EU Administrative Law.
Search in Google Scholar
The High Commercial Court of Croatia. 2013.Zagreb: Ministry of Justice, Republic of Croatia.
Search in Google Scholar
Hodges, Christopher. 2012. “Current Discussions on Consumer Redress: Collective Redress and ADR.”13, 11–33.
Search in Google Scholar
Hodges, Christopher, Iris Benöhr and Naomi Creutzfeldt-Banda. 2012.Adopted from. Oxford: University of Oxford, Centre for socio-legal studies.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Hodges, Christopher, Iris Benöhr and Naomi Creutzfeldt-Banda. 2012a.Adopted from. University of Oxford: Centre for socio-legal studies.
Search in Google Scholar
Hodges, Christopher, Iris Benöhr and Naomi Creutzfeldt-Banda. 2012b.Oxford: European Civil Justice Systems, The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society in collaboration with the University of Oxford: Centre for Socio-Legal Studies.
Search in Google Scholar
Hodges, Christopher, Iris Benöhr and Naomi Creutzfeldt-Banda. 2012c.Oxford: University of Oxford: Center for Socio-Legal studies.
Search in Google Scholar
Hodges, Christopher, Iris Benöhr and Naomi Creutzfeldt-Banda. 2012d.Oxford, Portland, Oregon. United Kingdom: Hart Publishing.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Jeretina, Urša and Uzelac, Alan. 2014.International Review for Public Administration (IPAR), Vol. XII (4), 39–72. Ljubljana: Faculty of Administration, University of Ljubljana.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Juškys, A. and N. Ulbaitė. 2012. “Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes in the European Union: Current Issues and Future Opportunities.”4, 25–34.
Search in Google Scholar
Koprić, Ivan, Polona Kovač and Anamarija Musa. 2012. “Agencies between Expertise, Politics and Law: The Case of Countries in Transition in South Eastern Europe.” Budapest: 5NISPAcee-EGPA Trans-European Dialogue (TED5), 2–3 February 2012.
Search in Google Scholar
Lindell, Bengt. 2012. “Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Administration of Justice – Basic Principles.”(1999–2012), 312–344.
Search in Google Scholar
Macfarlane, Julie. 2012. “ADR and the Courts: Renewing our Commitment to Innovation.”95(3), article 9.
Search in Google Scholar
OECD-PUMA. 1999.. Sigma papers 27. Place: OECD Publishing, Paris, France.
Search in Google Scholar
Perritt Jr., Henry H. 1987. “Administrative Alternative Dispute Resolution: The Development of Negotiated Rulemaking and Other Processes.”14(4), 864–928.
Search in Google Scholar
Rous, Helena (2014).Pravna Praksa, No. 12/14, 16–18. Ljubljana: Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana.
Search in Google Scholar
The Slovenian Energy Regulatory Agency (ARSE). 2013.Ljubljana: The Energy Regulatory Agency, Republic of Slovenia.
Search in Google Scholar
The Slovenian Telecommunication Regulatory Agency (AKOS). 2013.Ljubljana: The Telecommunication Regulatory Agency, Republic of Slovenia.
Search in Google Scholar
The Supreme Court of Republic of Slovenia. 2013.Ljubljana: Ministry of Justice, Republic of Slovenia.
Search in Google Scholar
The Supreme Court of Republic of Slovenia. 2013a.Ljubljana: Ministry of Justice, Republic of Slovenia.
Search in Google Scholar
TNS Opinion & Social. 2011.The survey requested by EUROSTAT and DG-SANCO and coordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication.
Search in Google Scholar
Uzelac, Alan, S. Aras, M. Maršić, M. Mitrović, Ž. Kauzlarić and P. Stojčević. 2010.Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu 60(3), 1265–1308. Zagreb: Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb.
Search in Google Scholar