Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Administrative Aspects of Alternative Consumer Dispute Resolution in the European Union (EU), Slovenia and Croatia Cover

Administrative Aspects of Alternative Consumer Dispute Resolution in the European Union (EU), Slovenia and Croatia

NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
Volume 9 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)
By: Urša Jeretina  
Open Access
|Aug 2016

References

  1. Agrar, C. Haydar. 2012. Research of B2C and B2B International Markets in the Context of Benchmarking of European Union and Spain Performances. Master in International Business Administration and Languages. Universidad de Almería.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, Javier. 2009. Transforming Administrative Procedure: Towards a Third Generation of Administrative Procedures. Seville: Global Law Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Cardona, P. Francesco and Anke Freibert. 2007. “The European Administrative Space and Sigma Assessments of EU Candidate Countries.” Hrvatska javna uprava 7(1), 51–59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Cioclea, Elena A. 2012. “Principles of the European Administrative Space and their Impact on Performance in Public Organizations.” CES Working Papers 3, 288–295.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. The Commercial Court of Republic of Croatia. 2013. Annual Report of the Commercial Court in Period 2008–2013. Zagreb: Ministry of Justice, Republic of Croatia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. The Croatian Energy Regulatory Agency (HERA). 2013. Annual Reports for Consumer Complaints of HAKOM in Period 2008–2013. Zagreb: The Energy Regulatory Agency, Republic of Croatia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. The Croatian Telecommunication Regulatory Agency (HAKOM). 2013. Annual Reports for Consumer Complaints of HAKOM in Period 2008–2013. Zagreb: The Telecommunication Regulatory Agency, Republic of Croatia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Davies, Jim. 2012. “How well Placed is the Optimism surrounding the new ADR/ODR Proposals ?” Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 2, 63–64.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Directorate General for Health and Consumers – EC (DG SANCO). 2009. Study on the Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the European Union. Final Report. Civic Consulting of the Consumer Policy Evaluation Consortium. Berlin: Civic Consulting.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Directorate General for Health and Consumers – EC (DG SANCO). 2011. Consultation Paper: On the Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution as a Means to Resolve Disputes Related to Commercial Transactions and Practices in the European Union. Berlin: Civic Consulting.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Directorate General for Health and Consumers – EC (DG SANCO). 2014. Management Plan 2014. Public Version. Brussels: European Commission.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Dragos, Dacian C., Neamtu, Bogdana (2014). Alternative Dispute Resolution in European Administrative Law. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. European Commission. 2010. Europe 2020, a Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Communication from the Commission Brussels: COM (2010) 2020 final.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. European Commission. 2011. Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes in the Single Market. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee. Brussels: COM (791 final).
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. European Commission. 2011a. Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Consumer Programme 2014–2020. Brussels: COM (707 final), 0340 (COD).
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. European Commission. 2011b. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes. Commission staff working paper, Brussels: 1409 final (SEC).
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. European Commission. 2012. Alternative Dispute Resolution and Online Dispute Resolution for EU consumers: Questions and Answers. MEMO. Brusselss: European Commission.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. European Commission. 2012a. Single Market Act II, Together for New Growth. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: COM (2012) 573 final.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. European Commission. 2013. Towards a European Horizontal Framework for Collective Redress. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(401 final).
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. European Commission. 2013a. Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on Online Dispute Resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Regulation on consumer ODR).
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. European Commission. 2013b. Directive No 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on Alternative Dispute Resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR).
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. The Gallup Organization. 2011. Flash Eurobarometer 299, “Consumer Attitudes towards Cross-Border Sales and Consumer Protection”. The survey requested by EUROSTAT and DG-SANCO and coordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Goes, Pieter. 2014. “Legal Framework relating to Alternative Dispute Resolution in Belgium Public Law.” International Review for Public Administration 12(2–3), 9–31.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Herwig C. H. Hofmann, Jens-Peter Schneider and Jacques Ziller. (2014). ReNUAL Model Rules on EU Administrative Procedure. Book IV – contracts. Version for online publication. EU: Research Network on EU Administrative Law.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. The High Commercial Court of Croatia. 2013. Annual Reports for Court-Annexed Mediation of the High Commercial Court in Period 2008–2013. Zagreb: Ministry of Justice, Republic of Croatia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Hodges, Christopher. 2012. “Current Discussions on Consumer Redress: Collective Redress and ADR.” Annual Conference on European Consumer Law organized by ERA Forum 13, 11–33.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Hodges, Christopher, Iris Benöhr and Naomi Creutzfeldt-Banda. 2012. A Model for a National Consumer ADR Architecture. Adopted from Consumer ADR in Europe. Oxford: University of Oxford, Centre for socio-legal studies.10.5771/9783845259185
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Hodges, Christopher, Iris Benöhr and Naomi Creutzfeldt-Banda. 2012a. Essential Requirements and Key Performance Indicators. Adopted from Consumer ADR in Europe. University of Oxford: Centre for socio-legal studies.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Hodges, Christopher, Iris Benöhr and Naomi Creutzfeldt-Banda. 2012b. Consumer-to-Business ADR Structures: Harnessing the Power of CADR for Dispute Resolution and Regulating Market Behavior. Oxford: European Civil Justice Systems, The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society in collaboration with the University of Oxford: Centre for Socio-Legal Studies.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Hodges, Christopher, Iris Benöhr and Naomi Creutzfeldt-Banda. 2012c. Data on the Costs of Consumer ADR Schemes. Oxford: University of Oxford: Center for Socio-Legal studies.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Hodges, Christopher, Iris Benöhr and Naomi Creutzfeldt-Banda. 2012d. Consumer ADR in Europe. Oxford, Portland, Oregon. United Kingdom: Hart Publishing.10.5771/9783845259185
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Jeretina, Urša and Uzelac, Alan. 2014. Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Cases: Are Divergences an Obstacle to Effective Acces to Justice ? International Review for Public Administration (IPAR), Vol. XII (4), 39–72. Ljubljana: Faculty of Administration, University of Ljubljana.10.17573/ipar.2014.4.a02
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Juškys, A. and N. Ulbaitė. 2012. “Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes in the European Union: Current Issues and Future Opportunities.” Issues of Business and Law 4, 25–34.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Koprić, Ivan, Polona Kovač and Anamarija Musa. 2012. “Agencies between Expertise, Politics and Law: The Case of Countries in Transition in South Eastern Europe.” Budapest: 5th NISPAcee-EGPA Trans-European Dialogue (TED5), 2–3 February 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Lindell, Bengt. 2012. “Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Administration of Justice – Basic Principles.” Scandinavian Studies (1999–2012), 312–344.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Macfarlane, Julie. 2012. “ADR and the Courts: Renewing our Commitment to Innovation.” Marquette Law Review 95(3), article 9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. OECD-PUMA. 1999. European Principles for Public Administration. Sigma papers 27. Place: OECD Publishing, Paris, France.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Perritt Jr., Henry H. 1987. “Administrative Alternative Dispute Resolution: The Development of Negotiated Rulemaking and Other Processes.” Pepperdine Law Review 14(4), 864–928.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Rous, Helena (2014). Novi trendi EU glede alternativnega reševanja sporov preko spleta. Pravna Praksa, No. 12/14, 16–18. Ljubljana: Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. The Slovenian Energy Regulatory Agency (ARSE). 2013. Annual Reports for Consumer Complaints of ARSE in Period 2008–2013. Ljubljana: The Energy Regulatory Agency, Republic of Slovenia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. The Slovenian Telecommunication Regulatory Agency (AKOS). 2013. Annual Reports for Consumer Complaints of AKOS in Period 2008–2013. Ljubljana: The Telecommunication Regulatory Agency, Republic of Slovenia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. The Supreme Court of Republic of Slovenia. 2013. Annual Reports for Court-Annexed Mediation in Period 2008–2013. Ljubljana: Ministry of Justice, Republic of Slovenia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. The Supreme Court of Republic of Slovenia. 2013a. Annual Reports of the Supreme Court in the Period 2008–2013. Ljubljana: Ministry of Justice, Republic of Slovenia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. TNS Opinion & Social. 2011. Special Euro barometer 342, “Consumer Empowerment”. The survey requested by EUROSTAT and DG-SANCO and coordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Uzelac, Alan, S. Aras, M. Maršić, M. Mitrović, Ž. Kauzlarić and P. Stojčević. 2010. Aktualni trendovi mirnog rješavanja sporova u Hrvatskoj: dosezi i ograničenja. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu 60(3), 1265–1308. Zagreb: Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2016-0009 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4309
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 191 - 222
Published on: Aug 2, 2016
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution,
Consumer protection,
Public Administration,
CADR schemes,
European Administrative Space
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Political science,
Local government and administration

© 2016 Urša Jeretina, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 9 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)Next article