Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effective Legal Protection against the Excessive Length of Administrative Decision-Making: The Cases of Slovenia and Croatia Cover

Effective Legal Protection against the Excessive Length of Administrative Decision-Making: The Cases of Slovenia and Croatia

Open Access
|Aug 2016

References

  1. Administrative Justice in Europe. 2014.. Available at(last accessed 9 March 2016).
  2. Androjna, Vilko and Erik Kerševan. 2006.[Administrative Procedural Law: The administrative procedure and administrative dispute]. Ljubljana: GV Založba.
  3. Auburn, Jonathan, Jonathan Moffett and Andrew Sharland. 2013.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Auby, Jean-Bernard (ed.). 2014.. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
  5. Blomeyer and Sanz. 2012. “European Added Value Assessment on a Law of Administrative Procedure of the European Union, Annex III, Aspects Relating to the Efficiency of the EU Administration.”1/2012, III-1-III-96. Available at(last accessed 14 September 2015).
  6. Britvić Vetma, Bosiljka. 2012. “Europska konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava (čl. 6.) i Zakon o upravnim sporovima iz 2010” [European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights (Art. 6.) and the Administrative Disputes Act of 2010].49(2), 395–410.
  7. Cardona, Francisco. 2005. “Checklist for general law on administrative procedures.” SIGMA. Available at(last accessed 1 April 2016).
  8. Đanić, Ana and Lana Ofak. 2014. “Djelotvornost žalbe u upravnom sporu kao jedno od temeljnih instituta zaštite ljudskih prava” [Effectiveness of Appeal in Administrative Dispute as one of the Institutes for Protection of Human Rights].30(2), 167–183.
  9. Đerđa, Dario and Marko Šikić. 2012.[Commentary on the Administrative Disputes Act]. Zagreb: Novi informator.
  10. Dubois, Eric, Christel Schurrer and Marco Velicogna. 2013.. Strasbourg: CEPEJ.
  11. European Court of Human Rights Case Law, HUDOC. Available at(last accessed 15 January 2015).
  12. Galligan, Denis J., Richard H. Langan II and Constance S. Nicandrou. 1998.. Oxford: Open Society Institute, Constitutional and Legislative Policy Institute and the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford.
  13. Grafenauer, Božo and Janez Breznik. 2009.[Administrative Law: Procedural section]^. Ljubljana: Gospodarski vestnik.
  14. Koprić, Ivan. 2006. “Upravno sudovanje u svjetlu prilagodbe standardima EU-a” [Administrative adjudication in light of adjustments to EU standards]. In Jakša Barbić (ed.).[Reform of administrative courts and administrative procedures]. Zagreb: Hrvatska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti (HAZU), 58–63.
  15. Koprić, Ivan (ed.). 2014.[The Europeanisation of administrative adjudication]. Zagreb: Institut za javnu upravu.
  16. Kovač, Polonca. 2012. “Fighting Administrative Silence in European and Slovene Law and Practice.” In Dacian C. Dragoş, François Lafarge and Paulien Willemsen (eds).. Bucharest: Economicǎ, 79–106.
  17. Künnecke, Martina. 2007.. Berlin, New York: Springer.
  18. Medvedović, Dragan. 2002. “Upravno sudstvo u Hrvatskoj: prilog za povijesni pregled” [The Administrative Judiciary in Croatia: Contribution to a historic overview]. In Marija Kriletić (ed.).Zagreb: Narodne novine, 1–35.
  19. Omejec, Jasna. 2006. “Prilog reformi upravnog spora-odnosi između Upravnog i Ustavnog sudovanja u Republici Hrvatskoj” [Contribution to the reform of administrative dispute-relationships between administrative and constitutional adjudication in the Republic of Croatia]. In Marica Kuzmić and Ante Šumelj (eds).[Administrative law and administrative procedure in practice – current questions and problems]. Zagreb: Inženjerski biro, 8–22.
  20. “Reforma sustava upravnog sudovanja u Hrvatskoj” [Reform of the system of administrative adjudication in Croatia]. 2008.8(3), 567–586.
  21. Rostaš-Beroš, Lidija. 2013. “Dileme u primjeni novog Zakonu o upravnim sporovima” [Dilemmas in the application of the new Administrative Disputes Act].50(2), 473–481.
  22. Savi, Riin and Merlilin Metsma. 2013.. Available at(last accessed 24 February 2016).
  23. Sever, Tina, Vedran Đulabić and Polonca Kovač. 2015. “Optimization of Administrative Capacity and Procedures of Constructing Permitting in Slovenia and Croatia.” Paper presented at NISPAcee conference:21–23 May 2015, Tbilisi, Georgia.
  24. Sever, Tina, Iztok Rakar and Polonca Kovač. 2014. “Protecting Human Rights through Fundamental Principles of Administrative Procedures in Eastern Europe.”5(4), 249–275.
  25. Sorin, Dan. 2015. “The New Public Management is not that Bad after all: Evidence from Estonia, Hungary and Romania.”44 E, 57–73.
  26. Statskontoret. 2005. “Principles of Good Administration in the Member States of the European Union.” Available at(last accessed 23 January 2015).
  27. Study on the Functioning of Judicial Systems in the EU Member States, Facts and Figures from the CEPEJ questionnaires 2010–2012–2013, CEPEJ(2014)17final (v2.0–16 February 2015).
  28. Šikić, Marko. 2008a. “Pitanja uređenja i primjene pravne zaštite od šutnje uprave u Republici Hrvatskoj” [Questions on the planning and implementation of the legal protection of administrative silence in Croatia].29(1), 491–521.
  29. Šikić, Marko. 2008b. “Primjena pravnih fikcija u institutu zaštite građana od šutnje uprave” [The application of the legal fiction of the institute of the protection of citizens regarding administrative silence].45(1), 149–174.
  30. Šikić, Marko. 2009. “Pravo na suđenje u razumnom roku u postupcima pred Upravnim sudom Republike Hrvatske” [The right to a trial within reasonable time in proceedings before the Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia].30(1), 333–372.
  31. 2015 EU Justice Scoreboard, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2015) 116 final, European Commission, Directorate-General for Justice.
  32. Tour of Europe, Contribution of Austria (as of 05/11/2015). Available at(last accessed 25 February 2016).
  33. Virant, Grega and Polonca Kovač. 2010. “Reducing Administrative Burdens as Part of the ‘Better Regulation’ Programme: The Case of Slovenia.”8(4), 369–390.
  34. Venice Commission – European Commission for Democracy through Law. 2011. “Stocktaking on the Notions of ‘Good Governance’ and ‘Good Administration’, Study No. 470/2008, CDL-AD(2001)009”. Available at(last accessed 2 June 2016).
  35. Woehrling, Jean-Marie. 2009. “Protecting Legality: Public Administration and Judiciary in EU Countries, How to Conciliate Executive Accountability and Judicial Review ?” Paper presented at the, 26–27 March 2009, Budva, Montenegro.(last accessed 20 February 2016).
  36. Woehrling, Jean-Marie. 2014. “Javna uprava i upravno sudovanje u zemljama Europske unije: kako pomiriti odgovornost izvršne vlasti i sudski nadzor uprave” [Public Administration and Administrative Justice in EU Countries: How to Harmonise Executive Authority Responsibility and Judicial Control of Administration]. In Ivan Koprić (ed.).[The Europeanisation of Administrative Adjudication]. Zagreb: Institut za javnu upravu, 21–34.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2016-0007 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4309 | Journal ISSN: 1337-9038
Language: English
Page range: 135 - 166
Published on: Aug 2, 2016
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Tina Sever, Ana Đanić, Polonca Kovać, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.