The Evaluation of the Role of the Office for Protection of Competition of the Czech Republic in Regulating Public Procurement
References
- Andreoni, J. 1991. “Reasonable Doubt and the Optimal Magnitude of Fines: Should the Penalty Fit the Crime ?”22(3), 385–395.
- Biandi, T. and V. Guidi. 2010. The Comparative Survey on the National Public Procurement Systems Across the PNN. Autority for supervising public contracts. S. p. A. Roma.
- Bose, P. 1995. “Regulatory errors, optimal fines and the level of compliance..” 56 (3), 475–484.
- Bovis, Ch. (ed.). 2016.. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Cooter, R. and Th. Ulen. 2011.. 6edn. Pearson Series in Economics. New York: Prentice Hall.
- Domberger, S. and S. Rimmer. 1994. “Competitive Tendering and Contracting in the Public Sector: A Survey.”1, 439–453.
- European Commision. 2014.. Brussels: European Commission.
- Friedman, D. D. 2000.. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
- Graells, A. S. 2015. “New Rules for Health Care Procurement in the UK: A Critical Assessment from the Perspective of EU Economic Law.”24, 16–30.
- Hastie, R. and R. N. Dawes. 2010.London: SAGE.
- Jurčík, R. 2014.. 2edn. Praha: C. H. Beck.
- Kuhlman, J. R. and S. R. Johnson. 1983. “The Number of Competititors and Bid Prices.”50(1), 213–220.
- Lahr, M. L. and E. Dietzenbacher (eds). 2001.. London: Palgrave.
- Leontief, W. W. 1986.. 2edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Lott, J. R. Jr. 1996. “The Level of Optimal Fines to Prevent Fraud When Reputations Exist and Penalty Clauses are Unenforceable.”17(4), 363–380.
- Lundsgaard, J. 2002. “Competition Efficiency in Publicy Funded Service.”35, 79–128.
- Mikušová Meričková, B. and J. Nemec. 2013. “Contract Management and its Impact on Contracting Public Services: Slovak Republic.”časopis 61(7), 690–699.
- Miller, R. E. and P. D. Blair. 1985.. Cambridge: Prentice Hall.
- Ministry for Regional Development. (2015). Výroční zpráva o stavu veřejných zakázek v České republice za rok 2014. Prague: Ministry for Regional Development.
- Motchenkova, E. 2008. “Determination of Optimal Penalties for Antitrust Violations in Dynamic Setting.”189(1), 269–291.
- Nemec, J. and M. Grega. 2015. “Factors Influencing Final Price of Public Procurement: Evidence from Slovakia.”. Praha: Elsevier B. V., 543–551.
- Nemec, J, M. Grega, M. Orviská and M. Šumpíková. 2015. “Selected factors determining the performance of the Czech public procurement system”. In Hájek, P., Mumanachyt, P. and Jone, A. M (eds.). Conference Proceedings: CBU International Conference. Praha: Central Bohemia University Praha, 242–247.
- Nemec, J., F. Ochrana, J. Pavel and V. Šagát. 2010.. Praha: Wolters Kluver.
- Nemec, J., M. Šumpíková, S. Klazar and M. Grega. 2014. “Efficiency versus Economy in Public Procurement.” In T. Löster and T. Pavelka (eds). Conference Proceedings:. Praha: Melandrium, 1054–1063.
- Niskanen, W. A. 1971.. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
- Niskanen, W. A. 1994.. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
- Ochrana, F. and J. Pavel. 2013. “Analysis of the Impact of Transparency, Corruption, Openness in Competion and Tender Procedures on Public Procurement in the Czech Republic.”7(2), 116–137.
- Pavel, J. 2009.ČeskéPraha: Transparency International.
- Schmidt, M. 2014. “Pokuty za správní delikty ve veřejných zakázkách: ekonometrický model.”školy2014(6), 35–50.
- Simon, H. A. 1959. “Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science.”49(3), 253–283.
- Simon, H. A. 1947.. New York. The Macmillan Company.
- Soukopová, J. and I. Malý. 2013. “Competitive Environment in Waste Management and its Impact on Municipal Expenditures.”61(4), 1113–1119.
- Strand, I., P. Ramada and E. Canton et al. 2011.. Brussels: European Commission.
- Špalková, D., J. Špalek and J. Nemec. 2015. “Performance Management and Performance Appraisal: Czech Self-Governments.”8(2), 69–88.
- Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice Science.”211(448), 453–458.
- Williamsson, O. 1981. “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Costs Approach.”87(3), 548–577.
- Williamsson, O. 1991. “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives.”36(2), 269–296.
- Zákon 273/1996 Sb. dne 11. října 1996 o působnosti Úřadu pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže.
- Zákon č. 99/1963 Sb., občanský soudní řád, ve znění pozdějších předpisů.
Language: English
Page range: 97 - 116
Published on: Aug 2, 2016
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2016 Michal Plaček, František Ochrana, Martin Schmidt, Milan Půček, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.