Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparative Analysis of Selected Factors Affecting Heating Costs of Schools in Selected Balkan Countries Cover

Comparative Analysis of Selected Factors Affecting Heating Costs of Schools in Selected Balkan Countries

Open Access
|Jul 2015

References

  1. Ágh, A. 2010. “Europeanization and Democratization in ECE: Towards the Multilevel and Multiactor Governance.”.3 (1). 7 – 59.
  2. Aristovnik, A. 2012. “Fiscal Decentralization in Eastern Europe: Trends and Selected Issues.”37E, 5 – 22.
  3. Baldwin, R. and C. Wyplosz. 2004.. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
  4. Bartlett, W. P. 2013.. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  5. Blank, J. L. and V. G. Valdmanis. 2010. “Environmental Factors and Productivity on Dutch Hospitals: A Semi-Parametric Approach.”13(1), 27 – 34.
  6. Byrnes, J., L. Crase, B. Dollery and R. Villano. 2010. “The Relative Economic Efficiency of Urban Water Utilities in Regional New South Wales and Victoria.”32(3), 439 – 455.
  7. Deng, Q., X. Jiang, Q. Cui and L. Zhang. 2015. “Strategic Design of Cost Savings Guarantee in Energy Performance Contracting under Uncertainty.”, 13968-80. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.027.
  8. De Witte, K. and Geys, B., 2012. “Citizen coproduction and efficient public good provision: Theory and evidence from local public libraries,”SP II 2012 – 108, Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB).
  9. Gaebler, L. R. 1971. “Population Size as a Determinant of City Expenditures and Employment: Some Further Evidence.”47(2), 130 – 138.
  10. Gellén, M. 2012. “Does Centralization Serve Efficiency? De-Agencification in Hungary.”5 (2). 67 – 87.
  11. Hammerschmid, G., S. Van de Walle and V. Stimac. 2013. “Internal and External Use of Performance Information in Public Organizations: Results from International Survey.”33(4), 261 – 268.
  12. Kuhlmann, S. and T. Jäkel. 2013. “Competing, Collaborating or Controlling? Comparing Benchmarking in European Local Government.”33(4), 269 – 276.
  13. Kuhlmann, S. and P. Fedele.2010 “New Public Management in Continental Europe, Local Government Organization in Germany, France and Italy from a Comparative Perspective.” In Wollman H. and Marcou G.Cheltenham Glos. Edward Edgar Publishing.
  14. Lee, P., P. Lam and W. Lee. 2015. “Risks in Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) Projects.”, 92116-127. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.054.
  15. Magd, H. and A. Curry. 2003. “Benchmarking: Achieving Best Value in Public-Sector Organisations.”10(3), 261 – 286.
  16. Matějová, L., M. Plaček, M. Křápek, M. Půček and F. Ochrana. 2014. “Economies of Scale: Empirical Evidence from the Czech Republic.” In Danuše Nerudova (ed.).: 17International Conference Enterprise and Competitive Environment 2014. 1edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, 403 – 411.
  17. Meričková, B., M. Šumpíková and P. Rousek. 2009. “Benchmarking na úrovni miestnej samosprávy: vybrané problémy” [Benchmarking at the level of local government: Selected issues]. In Květa Kubátová.[Theoretical and practical aspects of public finance]. Praha: Nakladatelství Oeconomica, 1 – 15.
  18. Meričková, B., Nemec, J. and Vozárová, Z. 2012. “Management of contracting public services and its quality in Slovakia.”5 (1). 55 – 74.
  19. Montén, A. and C. Thater. 2011. “Determinants of Efficiency in Child-Care Provision.”67(4), 378 – 403.
  20. Musgrave, R. and P. Musgrave. 1989.. 5edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  21. Nail, M., D. Anderson and J. Comerford. 2004. “If Energy Performance Contracting Is So Good Why Aren’t More Agencies Using It?”61(4), 26 – 30.
  22. Nemec, J., B. Meričková and M. Fantová-Šumpíková. 2011. “Is the Estonian Benchmarking Really Better? The Impacts of Research Methodology on Research Results.”13(4), 539 – 549.
  23. Nemec, J., B. Meričková and F. Ochrana. 2008. “Introducing Benchmarking in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: Processes, Problems and Lessons.”10(5), 673 – 684.
  24. Nemec, J., B. Mikušová Meričkováa and M. Grega. 2014. “Contracting, Outsourcing, Procurement: Selected Factors Limiting their Success in the CEE Region.” Paper presented at, 9 – 11 April, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
  25. Nenadál, J., D. Vykydal and P. Halfarová. 2011.[Benchmarking myths and reality]. Praha: Management Press.
  26. Oates, W. E. 1999. “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism.”37(3), 1120 – 1149.
  27. Oates, W. E. 1977. “An Economist’s Perspective on Fiscal Federalism.” In W. E. Oates.. Lexington, MA: Heath – Lexington, 3 – 30.
  28. Oates, W. E. 1972.. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  29. OECD. 2011. “Education at a Glance.” Available at(last accessed September 7, 2014).
  30. Palermo, F. 2013.Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  31. Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., F. González-Gómez and F. J. Sáez-Fernández. 2009. “Accounting for Operating Environments in Measuring Water Utilities’ Managerial Efficiency.”29(6), 761 – 773.
  32. Plaček, M., Půček, M. and Jetmar, M. 2014. “Collaborative benchmarking of municipalities in the Czech republic: present experience.”. 7 (1): 63 – 83.
  33. P Squared Group, LLC. 2008.. Madison, Wisconsin: P Squared Group LLC and Biomass Energy Resource Center.
  34. Půček, M. 2014. “Vedou vyšší výdaje na úředníka k nižšímu riziku korupce? (Analýza českých krajů)” [Do higher expenditures per official result in lower risk of corruption? (Analysis of Czech regions].2(62), 150 – 166.
  35. Půček, M. and F. Ochrana. 2014. “Theory and Practice of the Public Sector Savings: The Case of Czech Regions.”42E, 203 – 224.
  36. Search I, II. 2014. “School Environment and Respiratory Health of Children (Ministero dell’Ambiente Edellatutela del Territorio e del Mare).” Regional Environmental Center. Available at(last accessed September 7, 2014).
  37. Špaček, D. 2014.“Coordination of and through E-Government: The Case of the Czech Republic.”.7 (1). 83 – 106.
  38. Tiebout, M. C. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditure.”64, 416 – 424.
  39. Vancauwenberghe, G., Crompvoets, J. and Bouckaert, G. 2011. “Interorganizational Information Sharing as a Driver of Change in Public Administration.”.3 (2). 87 – 106.
  40. Walter, M. and A. Cullmann. 2008. “Potential Gains from Mergers in Local Public Transport: An Efficiency Analysis Applied to Germany.” Discussion papers 832. Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research.
  41. Zahradník, P. and D. Koppitz. 2012.. Under the assignment of: Transfer of Czech knowledge in support of local government association of Macedonia and Kosovo to strengthen capacities for policy advocacy for improving/establishing fiscal incentives for energy efficiency measures in public schools. Praha: Mepco.
  42. Zahradník, P., M. Zajíček and D. Koppitz. 2013a.. Praha: Mepco.
  43. Zahradník, P., M. Zajíček and D. Koppitz. 2013b.. Within the assignment: Transfer of Czech knowledge in support of local government association of Macedonia and Kosovo to strengthen capacities for policy advocacy for improving/establishing fiscal incentives for energy efficiency measures in public schools. Mepco. Praha.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2015-0004 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4309 | Journal ISSN: 1337-9038
Language: English
Page range: 61 - 84
Published on: Jul 27, 2015
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2015 David Koppitz, Milan Půček, František Ochrana, Michal Plaček, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.