Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Identification of Czech Metropolitan Regions: How to improve targeting of innovation policy Cover

Identification of Czech Metropolitan Regions: How to improve targeting of innovation policy

Open Access
|Mar 2016

References

  1. 1. Albertina Database. (2014). Databáze firem a institucí ALBERTINA CZ Gold Edition. Praha: Bisnode. Retrieved from DVD database.
  2. 2. Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: the integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013100704794
  3. 3. Bučar, M., Jaklič, A., & Stare, M. (2010). Innovation potential of public and private sectors' cooperation in knowledge-intensive services in Slovenia. Naše gospodarstvo, 56(5–6), 29–35.
  4. 4. Buesa, M., Heijs, J., Pellitero, M. M., & Baumert, T. (2006). Regional systems of innovation and the knowledge production function: the Spanish case. Technovation, 26(4), 463–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.11.007
  5. 5. Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
  6. 6. Cooke, P. (2004). Introduction: Regional innovation systems—an evolutionary approach. In P. N. Cooke, M. Heidenreich, & H. J. Braczyk (Eds.), Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world (pp. 1–18). London and New York: Routledge.
  7. 7. Cooke, P., Boekholt, P., & Tödtling, F. (2000). The governance of innovation in Europe: Regional perspectives on global competitiveness. London and New York: Pinter.
  8. 8. CZSO. (2013a). Statistické ročenky krajů 2013. Retrieved from www.czso.cz
  9. 9. CZSO. (2013b). Ukazatele výzkumu a vývoje podle krajů České republiky 2005–2012. Retrieved from www.czso.cz
  10. 10. CZSO. (2014). Inovační aktivity podniků v ČR—2010 až 2012. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
  11. 11. Dautel, V., & Walther, O. (2014). The geography of innovation in a small metropolitan region: An intra-regional approach in Luxembourg. Papers in Regional Science, 93(4), 703–725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12019
  12. 12. Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in Society, 24(3), 243–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00007-6
  13. 13. Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.01.002
  14. 14. Edquist, C., & Hommen, L. (1999). Systems of innovation: theory and policy for the demand side. Technology in Society, 21(1), 63–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(98)00037-2
  15. 15. Fischer, M. M. (2001). Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of innovation. The Annals of Regional Science, 35(2), 199–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001680000034
  16. 16. Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems—complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, 31(2), 191–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00136-6
  17. 17. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4
  18. 18. Isaksen, A. (2001). Building regional innovation systems: is endogenous industrial development possible in the global economy? Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 24(1), 101–120.
  19. 19. Kaufmann, A. (2007). Patterns of innovation relations in metropolitan regions: the case of the Vienna urban region. The Annals of Regional Science, 41(3), 735–748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0119-5
  20. 20. Klímová, V., & Žítek, V. (2015). Inovační paradox v Česku: Ekonomická teorie a politická realita. Politická Ekonomie, 2015(2), 147–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.994
  21. 21. Kutscherauer, A., Fachinelli, H., Hučka, M., Skokan, K., Sucháček, J., Tománek, P., & Tuleja, P. (2010). Regionální disparity v územním rozvoji České republiky—jejich vznik, identifikace a eliminace. Ostrava: VSB-Technical University Ostrava.
  22. 22. Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). From the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. Globelics Academy. Retrieved from www.globelicsacademy.net
  23. 23. Lundvall, B. A. (2010). National systems of innovation. Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Anthem Press.10.7135/UPO9781843318903
  24. 24. Mavrič, J., Tominc, P., & Bobek, V. (2014). Qualitative indicators for measuring the performance development of selected cities. Naše Gospodarstvo, 60(3–4), 13–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.7549/ourecon.2014.3-4.02
  25. 25. Melecký, L., & Staníčková, M. (2011). Hodnocení konkurenceschopnosti regionů České republiky v kontextu Lisabonské strategie. Ekonomická Revue, 14(3), 183–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.7327/cerei.2011.09.04
  26. 26. Metcalfe, S., & Ramlogan, R. (2008). Innovation systems and the competitive process in developing economies. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48(2), 433–446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2006.12.021
  27. 27. Mytelka, L. K., & Smith, K. (2002). Policy learning and innovation theory: an interactive and co-evolving process. Research Policy, 31(8), 1467–1479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00076-8
  28. 28. Poledníková, E., & Lelková, P. (2012). Evaluation of regional disparities in Visegrad four countries, Germany and Austria using the cluster analysis. In V. Klímová & V. Žítek (Eds.) 15th International Colloquium on Regional Sciences (pp. 36–47). Brno: Masaryk University.
  29. 29. Powell, W. W., & Grodal, S. (2005). Networks of innovators. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 56–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  30. 30. Tijssen, R. J. W. (1998). Quantitative assessment of large heterogeneous R&D networks: The case of process engineering in the Netherlands. Research Policy, 26(7–8), 791–809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00060-7
  31. 31. Tödtling, F., & Kaufmann, A. (1999). Innovation systems in regions of Europe—A comparative perspective. European Planning Studies, 7(6), 699–717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654319908720549
  32. 32. Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
  33. 33. Tödtling, F., Skokan, K., Höglinger, C., Rumpel, P., & Grillitsch, M. (2013). Innovation and knowledge sourcing of modern sectors in old industrial regions: comparing software firms in Moravia-Silesia and Upper Austria. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 188–205.10.1177/0969776411428498
  34. 34. Trippl, M., Asheim, B., & Miorner, J. (2015). Identification of regions with less developed research and innovation systems. Lund University Working Paper 2015(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969776411428498
  35. 35. Viturka, M., Halámek, P., Klímová, V., Tonev, P., & Žítek, V. (2010). Kvalita podnikatelského prostředí, regionální konkurenceschopnost a strategie regionálního rozvoje České republiky. Praha: Grada publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ngoe-2016-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2385-8052 | Journal ISSN: 0547-3101
Language: English
Page range: 46 - 55
Submitted on: Nov 1, 2015
Accepted on: Feb 1, 2016
Published on: Mar 19, 2016
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Viktorie Klímová, Vladimír Žítek, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.