Identification of Czech Metropolitan Regions: How to improve targeting of innovation policy
By: Viktorie Klímová and Vladimír Žítek

References
- 1. Albertina Database. (2014).. Praha: Bisnode. Retrieved from DVD database.
- 2. Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: the integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge.,(1), 77–86.
- 3. Bučar, M., Jaklič, A., & Stare, M. (2010). Innovation potential of public and private sectors' cooperation in knowledge-intensive services in Slovenia.(5–6), 29–35.
- 4. Buesa, M., Heijs, J., Pellitero, M. M., & Baumert, T. (2006). Regional systems of innovation and the knowledge production function: the Spanish case.,(4), 463–472.
- 5. Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe.,(3), 365–382.
- 6. Cooke, P. (2004). Introduction: Regional innovation systems—an evolutionary approach. In P. N. Cooke, M. Heidenreich, & H. J. Braczyk (Eds.),(pp. 1–18). London and New York: Routledge.
- 7. Cooke, P., Boekholt, P., & Tödtling, F. (2000).. London and New York: Pinter.
- 8. CZSO. (2013a).. Retrieved from
- 9. CZSO. (2013b).ČeskéRetrieved from
- 10. CZSO. (2014).. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
- 11. Dautel, V., & Walther, O. (2014). The geography of innovation in a small metropolitan region: An intra-regional approach in Luxembourg.,(4), 703–725.
- 12. Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation.(3), 243–263.
- 13. Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues.(2), 133–153.
- 14. Edquist, C., & Hommen, L. (1999). Systems of innovation: theory and policy for the demand side.(1), 63–79.
- 15. Fischer, M. M. (2001). Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of innovation.(2), 199–216.
- 16. Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems—complementarity and economic growth.,(2), 191–211.
- 17. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity.,(6), 899–933.
- 18. Isaksen, A. (2001). Building regional innovation systems: is endogenous industrial development possible in the global economy?,(1), 101–120.
- 19. Kaufmann, A. (2007). Patterns of innovation relations in metropolitan regions: the case of the Vienna urban region.(3), 735–748.
- 20. Klímová, V., & Žítek, V. (2015). Inovační paradox v Česku: Ekonomická teorie a politická realita.(2), 147–166.
- 21. Kutscherauer, A., Fachinelli, H., Hučka, M., Skokan, K., Sucháček, J., Tománek, P., & Tuleja, P. (2010).územnímČeské. Ostrava: VSB-Technical University Ostrava.
- 22. Lundvall, B. Å. (2007).. Globelics Academy. Retrieved from
- 23. Lundvall, B. A. (2010).. London: Anthem Press.
- 24. Mavrič, J., Tominc, P., & Bobek, V. (2014). Qualitative indicators for measuring the performance development of selected cities.,(3–4), 13–25.
- 25. Melecký, L., & Staníčková, M. (2011). Hodnocení konkurenceschopnosti regionů České republiky v kontextu Lisabonské strategie.,(3), 183–200.
- 26. Metcalfe, S., & Ramlogan, R. (2008). Innovation systems and the competitive process in developing economies.(2), 433–446.
- 27. Mytelka, L. K., & Smith, K. (2002). Policy learning and innovation theory: an interactive and co-evolving process.,(8), 1467–1479.
- 28. Poledníková, E., & Lelková, P. (2012). Evaluation of regional disparities in Visegrad four countries, Germany and Austria using the cluster analysis. In V. Klímová & V. Žítek (Eds.)(pp. 36–47). Brno: Masaryk University.
- 29. Powell, W. W., & Grodal, S. (2005). Networks of innovators. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.),(pp. 56–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- 30. Tijssen, R. J. W. (1998). Quantitative assessment of large heterogeneous R&D networks: The case of process engineering in the Netherlands.(7–8), 791–809.
- 31. Tödtling, F., & Kaufmann, A. (1999). Innovation systems in regions of Europe—A comparative perspective.,(6), 699–717.
- 32. Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach.(8), 1203–1219.
- 33. Tödtling, F., Skokan, K., Höglinger, C., Rumpel, P., & Grillitsch, M. (2013). Innovation and knowledge sourcing of modern sectors in old industrial regions: comparing software firms in Moravia-Silesia and Upper Austria.,(2), 188–205.
- 34. Trippl, M., Asheim, B., & Miorner, J. (2015).Lund University Working Paper 2015(1).
- 35. Viturka, M., Halámek, P., Klímová, V., Tonev, P., & Žítek, V. (2010).. Praha: Grada publishing.
Language: English
Page range: 46 - 55
Submitted on: Nov 1, 2015
Accepted on: Feb 1, 2016
Published on: Mar 19, 2016
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2016 Viktorie Klímová, Vladimír Žítek, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.